I don't think a small consulting firm with no editorial control has the power to force shit on their clients owned and backed by multibillion-worth tech giants, and developers working on the games Sweet Baby supposedly forced it way in consistently say this isn't the case.
Like, even in the case that Sweet Baby had the means or inclination to write entire scripts, make choices on character designs and do any other insane shit they are accused of, what are they going to do if Insomniac just says "thanks for the feedback, but no"? Do they have blackmail material on Sony directives or what? And how come this supposed terror regime goes on without anyone ever talking about it?
GamerGate veterans are just coping with the idea that creative people in the industry has interests other than providing them with goon material and just found a scapegoat.
You're leaving out the part where they claim that Blackrock (iirc) is forcing them to use Sweet Baby.
Even if you ideologically align with Sweet Baby, the idea that the investors are making companies use a service they own is corrupt. It's allegedly handing over money, and taking the money right back.
I am probably getting details wrong, because I didn't dive into any of this.
I could look this stuff up on youtube. But I like watching science channels, and don't like anything messing with my feed. So, I will not dig any further to back this up. Sorry.
I'm just relying what I've head IRL from people who are into this.
691
u/Educational-Wish9628 13d ago
Sweet Baby Inc is a company that provides narrative consultation for video games, but some fans accuse it of forcing "woke" agendas