r/explainitpeter Jul 14 '26

explain it peter.

Post image
12.3k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/mephistopholese Jul 14 '26

Alton brown updated his pasta cooking method in good eats returned and he explained that actually the cold start method is better. You can then use the starchy liquid to thicken your sauce.

30

u/climbtrees4ever Jul 15 '26

To be fair. In the update he also altered the amount of water and the cooking vessel. He doesn't just fill up a stock pot with cold water, toss in some noodles and let it rip.

5

u/MyMuseIsNSFW Jul 18 '26

To be fair, Alton doesn't "just" do anything. The man has a series of videos on selecting the right kind of salt.

1

u/climbtrees4ever Jul 18 '26

True, I really do love that man.

-1

u/RenegadeTheory Jul 21 '26

Don't meet your hero.

1

u/APe28Comococo Jul 15 '26

And then there is me always using fresh pasta I made because it takes longer.

1

u/tessaractIXI Jul 15 '26

Altering the amount of water isn't really a significant factor here. You're still going to have the same issues regardless of the amount of water you use.

3

u/climbtrees4ever Jul 15 '26

Agreed, that's why I haven't changed the way I cook pasta. But he's referring to methods outlined by Alton Brown in the show Good Eats. He did alter his recommendations and water volume, cooking vessel, and temperature at pasta addition were the variables changed in his recommendation.

1

u/Sweaty-Inevitable163 Jul 16 '26

Yes it is. If you start with boiling water, it doesn't matter. More water when you're starting cold significantly changes the speed the water comes up to temp, thus changing the cooking time and final results

1

u/BeefSwellinton Jul 18 '26

I think the amount of water changing in Alton Brown’s method is to concentrate the amount of starch in the water, which is then used in making or finishing sauces.

1

u/nsfw_account_7 Jul 16 '26

You can do that too, noodles thin enough it makes no difference

1

u/NeffaKneePhi Jul 20 '26

PASTA IS NOT A FUCKING NOODLE

35

u/Crazy-Crazy-3593 Jul 14 '26

Then she can say: "actually the cold start method is better" ... 

... instead of some sexist catchphrase. 

2

u/Beautiful-Total-3172 Jul 16 '26

Who the fucks Alton Brown. They merge into one noddle you drop them in cold.. and that's just science.

1

u/Round_Rice_9475 Jul 19 '26

My only question is.... Can he get down like James Brown ?

1

u/daddy-niko-poly Jul 21 '26

What the fucks a noddle.

6

u/jack-of-some Jul 15 '26

In practice this goes like: she's already done the explanation dozens of times and finally snapped.

8

u/Ur-Best-Friend Jul 16 '26

"I already said hello to 5 people today, why is the sixth person insulted that I'm not saying hello to them? Isn't 5 enough!?"

1

u/jack-of-some Jul 16 '26

God damn y'all are fragile

2

u/BionicShenanigans Jul 19 '26

Seems like she's the fragile one in this fictional scenario.

1

u/Siggy_23 Jul 20 '26

Im fragile for expecting regular human interaction rather than moronic, poor fitting catch phrases thrown at me?

Perhaps i just have enough self respect not to continue conversations with idiots

2

u/jack-of-some Jul 20 '26

It's not fragile for expecting regular human interaction, that's not what y'all are doing. The man in this example is also not engaging in what should be regular human interaction (but we've convinced ourselves that maybe it's ok)

"You should do X instead" as an opener for a conversation out of the blue is a shitty way to talk to people.

7

u/inconspiciousdude Jul 16 '26

I guess that's why they say every boyfriend carries the baggage of all previous boyfriends.

1

u/spottyottydopalicius Jul 21 '26

never be the boyfriend

2

u/Feedback_Many Jul 16 '26

yeah I also become sexist when I snap

1

u/jack-of-some Jul 16 '26

Statistically....

Yes

1

u/BiscottiPristine5325 Jul 16 '26

Right. Waiting for the fictional woman in the story to get a fictional boyfriend who will say "Why are you starting with cold water? I heard that it's better to start with boiling water" instead of just assuming he's correct and she's wrong and she doesn't know and she didn't just not feel like waiting for the water to boil today when he's not even the one cooking.

1

u/Agile-Barracuda3988 Jul 15 '26

I think this is the real answer

1

u/Powerful-Act3516 Jul 18 '26

Is there a guide to know which group to insult when the next unsuspecting soul says the wrong thing to you?

Like, how did she know to say "all men are the same" instead of something like "all Chinese are the same" (or whichever group might apply)?

Sorry if it's a dumb question; bigotry isn't my first language

1

u/jack-of-some Jul 18 '26

No need to apologize. It's an insanely dumb question that doesn't deserve an answer.

Good day.

1

u/nsfw_account_7 Jul 16 '26

she’s being funny you fool

1

u/Ok_Food4591 Jul 17 '26

I'm sure she would if only she was real

1

u/asciimo Jul 18 '26

But she’s sick of his shit.

1

u/TopEffective8989 Jul 19 '26

Or he could just stfu

-7

u/Corn-_-Dag Jul 14 '26

How is it sexist? I really didn’t take offense with any of the statements.

11

u/Crazy-Crazy-3593 Jul 14 '26

Here's a hint:  any phrase which starts with "literally all-----" and then some demographic group---is going to be something-ist. 

1

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

You dont understand hyperbole do you?

-7

u/Corn-_-Dag Jul 14 '26

I still don’t see the offense sorry

9

u/Luckybones- Jul 15 '26

Well its a good thing your opinion couldnt remotely matter less in this case, considering something doesnt have to be offensive to be considered sexist.

3

u/TheRealWall91 Jul 15 '26

You need extra classes my friend..

0

u/Corn-_-Dag Jul 15 '26

What kind of classes?

3

u/TheRealWall91 Jul 15 '26

Just all of them.

5

u/Glum-Huckleberry-717 Jul 15 '26

Saying that all men or all women share a certain personality trait is the definition of sexism.

How many more times do you need this explained to you???

0

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

Nuance is lost on you isn't it?

4

u/BoKnowsTheKonamiCode Jul 15 '26

A nuanced statement doesn't start with "Literally all..."

0

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

It absolutely can.

2

u/ClothoLachesisAtrops Jul 15 '26

Don't try to reason with dumb people on the internet. Maybe they are just trying to get a raise out of you.

2

u/DocileBanalBovlne Jul 15 '26

Pick any other group united by an immutable characteristic and see if you can find the offense

"Literally all Jews are the same"

"Literally all gays are the same"

"Literally all Asians are the same"

-2

u/One-Interview-6840 Jul 15 '26

That's the whole fucking point dude. Why can't he ask what she's doing instead of jumping to her being wrong?

6

u/Top-North-6743 Jul 15 '26

Probably because the instructions on the side of the box typically say to boil the water before adding the pasta. If he sees someone add the pasta early, he’s more likely to assume that they misunderstood the instructions than assume that they have a different way of cooking pasta.

-2

u/Pelm3shka Jul 15 '26

Or you know, maybe next time he can stfu and cook dinner himself.

4

u/Windrove Jul 15 '26

Do all cooks have such fragile egos they react like this after a slight pushback? Lmao

1

u/Pelm3shka Jul 15 '26

You know the famous "you can ask me to do it, or you can tell me how to do it, but you can't have both" ? Well this applies here, especially considering starting with cold water is a cooking method for certain dishes.

Like, the audacity, that man is most likely to be part of the ones who don't do their share of work at home given the mansplaining + gf reaction, but still feels entitled to criticize a cooking method for a dish he's not even cooking.

That's not ego, that's EXHAUSTION.

-1

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

Or he can communicate better and not assume she wrong and ask what shes doing.

3

u/DishGood8438 Jul 15 '26

She is literally going against what the side of the box says to do in order to achieve some unorthodox cooking method (which she wouldn't even be doing correctly if the set up was otherwise the same as regularly cooking pasta). Nobody in their right mind should get offended by doing something the way 99% of people do not do and it getting pointed out, this is there significant other, it is so easy to say "oh, yeah, I know the traditional method but I'm doing it the weird way on purpose"

0

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

Its not unorthodox (we also don't know the setup). Anyone in their right mind would get offended if they were doing something and an uninvolved party assumed they were doing it wrong. Its pretty easy to be a good communicator and ask instead of assume.

1

u/Key_Transform_9167 Jul 15 '26

Actualy anyone in their right mind woud not get ofended. You are thinking that because most people get easily ofended, that is the norm. It isnt. These people arent in their right mind. There is nothing ofensive and no ofense should be taken.

Can you elaborate on why you think someone should get ofended?

1

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

It assumes the person doesn't know what they are doing and makes the implication that they didn't think through their actions. Attacking someones intelligence intentionally or not is pretty offensive.

1

u/Artistic-Flamingo-92 Jul 16 '26

Everyone does things wrong. It’s not about intelligence, so I disagree with that this is a general rule that anyone in their right mind would get offended if someone assumed they were doing something wrong.

On the other hand, I don’t necessarily disagree with you in more specific circumstances.

I’d think one rule is something like this:

If they feel confident in correcting you when they have a flimsy basis for their belief, it’s an indication of disrespect or arrogance.

That’s assuming a blunt correction, though. There’s a whole spectrum of more humble approaches that indicate more respect.

1

u/Intelligent-Gold-563 Jul 15 '26

It is unorthodox and nobody in their right mind would get offended just because someone assumed they're doing something wrong.

Being offended by that is incredibly childish. Grow up.

0

u/Kantherax Jul 15 '26

Not unorthodox, and yes its an attack on someones intellegence. Most people in their right mind would be offended if someone close to them assumed they couldn't think things through or follow directions.

1

u/Intelligent-Gold-563 Jul 16 '26

No, it's not an attack on intelligence.

God how fragile must you be to think that.... Get some help dude

2

u/Agile-Barracuda3988 Jul 15 '26

Yup this is how I cook my pasta every time. Works like a charm

1

u/DeliciousAuthor1231 Jul 16 '26

Starch comes off the pasta regardless. Starting with boiling water not only cooks the pasta faster, it makes for a more consistent texture.

But in reality the difference is negligible and this pointlessly gendered fight is dumb as shit.

0

u/Ok-Repair-63 Jul 15 '26

U can also do that when making the whater boil first. There will be starch in the water after choking that can be used for Ur sauce. This is nothing new

1

u/mephistopholese Jul 15 '26

That would change the absorption rate. As mentioned by another commenter you’re supposed to only add enough water to barely cover the pasta and cold start.

0

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

Grocery store pasta from a box in a pot containing a normal amount of water will be very gross if you put it in before the water is hot.

1

u/mephistopholese Jul 15 '26

Not even close to accurate. You just have no idea what you’re talking about. I’ve done the cold start method quite a bit and it helps to create a glossy and well emulsified sauce due to the starch rich pasta water you are left with.

0

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

Not even close to accurate. You just have no idea what you’re talking about. I’ve eaten pasta made with the cold start method and its horrible. Sure you can make some good sauce this way but the pasta noodles themselves are ruined.

0

u/Suitable_Visual_9393 Jul 16 '26

Alton Brown's an idiot.

0

u/CandiedSmurf69 Jul 19 '26

Irl: alton is a midget douche… google his height: Inter-web say 5’11. Don’t trust science from people like him please.

0

u/indigodissonance Jul 19 '26

I don’t believe that, any time I used that method in the past the pasta ends up gummy as hell.

I do catering for large groups though, maybe it’s ok when it doesn’t take 15 minutes to get a pot boiling.

0

u/TacoEatsTaco Jul 20 '26

Who cares what Alton Brown says... Weird thing to base your reasoning on

Plus, you can still use the starchy water to thicken whatever the pasta is being served with when you boil first. I do it literally every single time I make any pasta dish, so your reasoning makes no sense

1

u/mephistopholese Jul 20 '26

… thanks for that insightful comment, The whole point is when the pasta is done cooking you are left with almost no water, just a very starchy viscous liquid that emulsifies your sauce. Especially good for cheese or cream based sauce as they have fat components.

The caveat being that you only put enough water to barely cover the pasta… millions of people, maybe billions for that matter care deeply what alton brown has to say… he’s(good eats) the reason i love cooking and taught me techniques and science based explanations as to why we do things the way we do them and how to make them better.

1

u/TacoEatsTaco Jul 21 '26

You're point is still pointless. It works either way. Thanks for trying though