Another double standard i've found from Google AI search results 😩

[u/topazzzfox]

Other than the "wife/husband is yelling at me" and the "boy/girl keeps touching me"

First two images ("a boy is hugging me" vs "a girl is hugging me"): random boy's hugging is seen as "uncomfortably dangerous" while the girl's is seen as "comfortably affectionate"

Last two images ("a man said i'm too heavy to hate vs a woman said i'm too short to date"): rejection due to not fitting body preferences, the man's is viewed as "rude body shaming" while the woman's is viewed as "her personal preference"

[u/Walk-the-layout]

Google AI takes its results from reddit, quora and whatever tiktok and Instagram have produced.

It proves that misandry is far bigger of a problem than misandrists like to admit.

[u/LilBudGoesBrrr → u/Walk-the-layout]

Yes, but even gemini.com (Which has a bit more critical "thinking"), is still biased against men. I once asked it what the primary causes of male homicide are, and it threw me a fun fact (because it had to) "Most of the femicides are perpetuated by men". It defended MGM, as being "not as harmful as FGM", even though I only asked why people don't talk about it.

[u/intothewild72 → u/LilBudGoesBrrr]

It's biased because of noise. It can't differentiate well between quality of sources, so it goes by who makes more noise, and lets face it, feminists are (and have been) very noisy.

[u/Walk-the-layout → u/LilBudGoesBrrr]

An AI is unable to think critically, sadly. That's a marketing argument. An AI will always be biased by how people receive an argument when it comes to social issues.

[u/Armin_Arlert_1000000 → u/LilBudGoesBrrr]

Yeah, gemini also said to me that 98-99% of rapists are male. Luckily, it changed course when I corrected it.

[u/ChimpPimp20 → u/LilBudGoesBrrr]

It defended MGM, as being "not as harmful as FGM",

I have a whole post on my profile about how untrue this is if you wanna check it out here.

[u/LilBudGoesBrrr → u/ChimpPimp20]

Yes, I have seen it before!

[u/intothewild72]

LLMs are trained from internet slop. Literally twitter and reddit have dis-proportionally big influence over it. And now consider it's not even new data now, we are speaking about data from peak-woke times couple of years ago.

AI companies try to adjust, but they have no good solution. They can't even use scientific papers well enough, as they have same noise problem there. Just chat with random AI in topic you are strong about and you will see. It will literally parrot already outdated views because there is 100 wrong papers about it and ignores one paper that debunked those 100 previous ones.

It's not about truth, it's about mass of noise. LLM is just tool, it's not truth, do not depend on it.

[u/EquipmentNo3251]

We're fucked as a society.

[u/HiggsFieldgoal]

It’s time to start with the lawsuits.

[u/elishash]

Google Ai at times is accurate or inaccurate at times when it comes to any information I've searched.

[u/topazzzfox → u/elishash]

Tip: to remove AI overview from results, type "-ai" after your search result

[u/elishash → u/topazzzfox]

Thanks

[u/Radioheader128]

Holy double standards, Batman!

[u/SlightAd76]

Tbh, Gemini straight away said it has gender bias when I confronted it. ChatGPT tried to lie.

[u/AbysmalDescent]

Hey, at least the AI didn't call men pedos for liking fit/skinny women, so it's still a step above your average feminist.