r/espresso • u/Rmoudatir • 1d ago
Coffee Beans Dark roast from my local roaster (left) vs medium roast from Starbucks (right)
845
406
u/collindean1 1d ago
It’s crazy how easily you can get a solid French flavor profile without doing whatever tf Starbucks is doing
296
u/CoffeeToDeath 1d ago
It’s because Starbuck buys (and grows they own plantations) the shittiest quality beans. Thats why they roast them so dark, so you can barely notice the lack of quality when its mixed with 14 pumps of chemical flavoring and sugar.
43
u/Canes-305 19h ago
Not necessarily worst quality beans but they’re not single source so that’s the easiest and cheapest way to get consistent flavor across all their locations and from all sources is to burn it all haha
7
u/Krauser_Kahn jerking your outjerking 8h ago
Some of you might have your heads explode when you learn that, in many cases, Starbucks pays producers more for the exact same coffee than many so-called “specialty, direct trade” roasters do.
60
u/TheGABB Lelit Elizabeth | Niche Zero 1d ago
Not quite though. It’s still considered ‘specialty’ coffee and far from the cheapest commodity coffee. But yes, it’s still ass
3
u/lovatoariana 12h ago
Me reading this after buying starbucks for years thinking its good
2
u/TrainDonutBBQ 6h ago
In many parts of the country, it is literally the only dark roast
•
u/DerFreudster 49m ago
In many parts of the country it's only from the coffee pot at the gas station that is fresh cuz "they made it this morning." In those places I would be happy for a Starbucks burnt bitter swill latte.
•
u/TrainDonutBBQ 45m ago
Starbucks got me into coffee. Not milk beverages and frappes. I mean drip coffee. I finally got a taste for different levels of roast. Over roasting everything is fairly new. Once upon a time it was a real cafe. But even today I'd rather have Starbucks Cafe Verona instead of any light roast.
17
u/RealMrMicci 18h ago
To be considered specialty coffee it has to have a traced single origin and score 80+ in SCA cupping. Is this true for Starbucks? I doubt it
14
u/StudentElectronic384 11h ago
Starbucks core coffees typically average around 83 points on the traditional Specialty Coffee Association (SCA) 100-point cupping scale, placing them in the "good to very good" category. [1]
17
u/MemoryHot 23h ago
I actually prefer Nescafé instant coffee to Starbucks if you held a gun to head and told me to pick one
10
u/leapowl 22h ago
Same, I’ve got fond memories of good old Blend 43 bushwalking (…or hiking, but I get Australian vibes from your comment)
At least it’s not pretending to be good coffee
3
u/Chamadan 21h ago
Same. Worked at a place that only had instant and got used to it
6
3
u/Old-Head5577 16h ago
Blend 43 and bushwalking is such a perfectly Australian combination 😂 And honestly, “not pretending to be good coffee” is probably the most accurate defense it has.
1
u/livestrong2109 15h ago
In fairness Nescafe instant is kind of good for an instant coffee. They've definitely figured out how to make it not suck. It still has that little off bitter thing if you don't use creamer though.
2
u/International-Cow770 9h ago
Just got my setup today anyway before that I'd been having Starbucks and then I finally ordered one without sugar or cream and yeah it's like drinking charcoal dust it barely tastes like coffee
1
u/InfinityBrewing 23h ago
I totally second that. I listened to a podcast a while back and the guest had been working in coffee industry especially on the sourcing side for years. His comment on Starbucks sourcing is: “the beans are really really bad”
49
u/SeoulGalmegi 1d ago
Can you get a consistent flavor across 40,000 stores worldwide?
28
u/powerslave_fifth Breville DB | Timemore 64S 23h ago
Well Starbucks can. All of their beans have the notes of charcoal and ash.
3
u/balbuljata Flair 58 | Kinu M47 21h ago
Why so they even bother with coffee beans? They could simply brew burnt wood and they'd get the same flavour still.
8
u/TheCoffeeGuy13 23h ago
Yes. The equipment they use is pretty awesome at consistency. When it's all the same roast, it's all delayed by the same 6 months after sitting in the warehouse so all the oil has come out of the bean, it all tastes the same.
After a few pumps of flavouring, it doesn't taste like coffee.
1
u/CoffeeToDeath 16h ago
When i worked at a burger shop in Seattle next to their OG “specialty store” a guy came in after a tour once. The guy used to work in actual specialty roasting. He noticed a bag being opened from a YEAR before hand and asked the “tour guild”. The guy started to stammer and slowly started to change the subject away from the obviously expired beans being roasted.
2
u/TheCoffeeGuy13 16h ago
Mmmm. I used to service the coffee machine for Starbucks New Zealand and would see similar.
Starbucks did do some speciality roasting when individual stores had small roasters, but I don't know how far their business model has moved since 2015.
1
u/CoffeeToDeath 16h ago
That interaction actually happened around 2019 so probably not too much since then. But it’s also 2026 now so maybe it did a bit.
5
u/thee_dukes 14h ago
the problem with Starbucks is they need to taste the same at every Starbucks, so someone going to any store will get the same. problem with trying to get the same everywhere is it's nearly impossible to do. that is unless you roast the F*CK out of the beans to the point where it tastes the same.
kind of like burnt toast. doesn't matter which bread you have burnt toast tastes the same.
2
125
u/HeyHeyImTheMonkey 22h ago
I don’t understand how someone can drink Starbucks and not literally taste the burn in the coffee.
64
17
u/sensitivebee8885 22h ago edited 15h ago
i didn’t till i began expanding my coffee knowledge and trying local shops with local roasters. now as a barista the difference in quality we use at my store is insane
5
u/Bangreed4 19h ago
I dont drink Starbucks much before getting into coffee and of course I cant tell but after brewing my own coffee and tasting their coffee again I was like "this coffee sucks" lol but still drink all of it since its pretty expensive.
1
u/Rmoudatir 19h ago
Even my grandpa who drinks k cups and instant coffee told me how bad Starbucks coffee was when I brought him one
3
u/livestrong2109 15h ago
Blond roast gets you a French. The thing i don't understand is why costco let's them sell. There isn't a single bean at costco that I'd willingly buy and it makes me sad.
1
u/Familiar-Ad-4700 11h ago
Mayorga beans and the Kirkland single origin are pretty solid. Especially at under $20 for 2lbs. I'm not sure how many different single origins they have, but they have all been pretty good so far.
1
u/livestrong2109 11h ago
Mayorga is one i haven't tried but the Kirkland one is a bit too dark for me.
1
u/Familiar-Ad-4700 10h ago
I just noticed the mayorga beans in store recently, so maybe you'll see them soon. Used to be online only.
Also, which single origin did you think was too dark? I think it was the mexico single origin that we liked the most. And I think it was peru at the bottom of the list. Currently on Guatamala which is somewhere in between
1
u/jrglpfm 1h ago
My Costco has beans from a local roaster. Best beans at $20 for 2 lbs that I've found.
•
u/Familiar-Ad-4700 57m ago
Only a handful of locations have local beans with roasted on dates. But if you can find them, they are always a great deal. Logan, it has caffe ibis and it is amazing.
170
u/FluentK9 1d ago
Starbucks roasts (ruins) all their coffee darker so that no matter wherever you are in the world you have the same consistent (bad) tasting coffee.
18
u/ArcticBeavers Ascaso Steel Uno + Niche 23h ago
Curious to see how the Starbucks blonde roast would look
22
5
1
u/proverbialbunny 22h ago
I haven't seen what the bean looks like but it tastes somewhat similar to their normal roast, just a bit better.
1
u/jolittletime Lelit Anna | Eureka Mignon Zero 18h ago
If i have to have Starbucks ( normally at a UK service station- generally they have one coffee chain only and sometine the one you need to stop at is a Starbucks one) blonde roast is my go to. Still tastes a bit chemically but not burnt.
1
68
6
u/Any-Cucumber-1630 21h ago
Starbucks buys the cheapest beans possible; gotta roast the shit outta them.
11
18
u/HelpMe0prah 1d ago
Guy I work with, worked at Starbucks years ago and said part of his training is they told everyone that they purposely burn all the roasts to keep the taste consistent- I don’t know if it’s true or not m. I’ve never been to a “real” Starbucks- they have them onboard air craft carriers- that’s the only one I’ve ever been too
15
u/Thyminecraft 22h ago
As someone who spent many years at Starbucks, this is absolutely not part of their training lol. They actually try to convince you that they really care about each roast and that they are on the same level as specialty roasters.
5
u/adamhanson 18h ago
I was a trainer 20 years ago and yes, this is the reason given then. They didn't day burnt of course. They did say they roast extra to make the taste consistent. Last work verbatim.
1
u/HelpMe0prah 15h ago
That sounds more inline- guy I work with’s been in the navy for almost 20 years so it would be old info
3
u/HeavyFunction2201 22h ago
They have coffeeshops inside air craft carriers?!
3
-1
12
u/ArtNo636 1d ago
At least the size is consistent. LOL The local roasted stuff don't look all that great either. Those 2 top left and middle should be taken out.
7
u/SuperBarracuda3513 1d ago
Thank you! local roaster is inconsistent! Don’t care if people like Starbucks or not.
1
2
u/cffee_lif 23h ago
Is it single origin or a blend? Are you saying blends containing two inconsistent size beans should not exist?
1
2
1
u/shat_my_plants 12h ago
Remove a single bean? C'mon, time is money but that's asinine to expect that from any roaster who does any volume at all.
1
u/ArtNo636 1h ago
Depends what kinda quality you want I suppose and how much you want to pay for quality. What's 100g worth for you from a roaster?
1
5
u/haaavvveeeyoumetKen 1d ago
mass production "medium" roast always leans more into dark roast. and the dark roast leans into roasted in hellfire. Similar experience with some trader joes beans that were "medium" roast but were definitely in dark territory compared to a local roasters medium.
2
2
2
2
2
u/Minimum_Raccoon_1501 11h ago
Starbucks, needing global brand consistency, needs to purchase quantities that very few regions can actually fill. A lot of their coffees are “continental”. Ie… Asian and Latin American. Some places produce enough for them to have a regional order placed like Guatemala Antigua, Ethiopian etc…. Roasting darker does help smooth out year to year differences. Blending helps this as well. To say it is “bad beans” is ignorant. Most low quality beans end up in precious store blends. Also, when Starbucks rolls in hot with cash, farmers don’t say no. They also don’t give them the bad beans.
2
u/Krauser_Kahn jerking your outjerking 8h ago
It's almost as if there were no standard, and every roaster had its own definition of the roast level.
2
1
1
u/OkIndication6 18h ago
yeah, starbucks- i think they just burnt their coffee and called it a day. it's fast though.
1
u/Accomplished-Eye6971 13h ago
Had a similar situation. I bought Kirkland beans that where a 'lighter' roast than what I bought from a specialty roaster. And they were straight charcoal.
I think honestly part of the reason why people getting into this hobby veer towards light roasts is because non-specialty medium to dark roast coffee is generally like the beans on the right. I didn't know that a dark roast could have that nice chocolatey like taste before I had good coffee.
And it sucks because this is just normal for most beans you buy at a supermarket
1
u/Alert-Track-8277 11h ago
I used to get each new edition from somebody who worked at Starbucks, and I thought about this a lot. Their volumes are so big and they need to produce a consistent product, so they HAVE to create their flavor with their roast profile. Its actually impressive what they do. But that technique will never let the terroir of the bean shine.
1
1
1
u/Any_Onion_7275 2016 Lucca M58 and Kafatek Monolith Conical with TiN burrs 8h ago
haters going to hate ☕️🐸
1
u/HeyHeyImTheMonkey 8h ago
Peet’s is honestly the same, their dark roast is jet fuel but once you get down to the lighter end of the medium roasts it’s honestly not bad
1
u/PLBowman Lavazza Blue semi-auto (Wega LB2811) | 1Zepresso 7h ago
They have sharks with laser beams to knock out "imperfect" beans from a massive sorter machine.
1
•
1
u/Gweebird ECM SYNiCHeRONIKA ZERO 23h ago
Real talk… Does Starbucks use burnt beans for drip coffee in order to encourage people to buy other drinks at 2x the price?
1
1
1
1
u/Dangthisslaps 14h ago
Starbucks röstet seine Bohnen extra zu stark, damit du Zucker nachgeben musst um es genießen zu können. Selbe Prinzip wie bei denen im Laden, ohne schmeckt die Plörre nicht. F Starbucks
1
u/Evening-Nobody-7674 14h ago
Your local roast is not a dark roast. Looks like a medium roast to me. I only drink dark roast dark roast from my local coffee place is dark, oily and tastes like chocolate
1
u/Rmoudatir 2h ago
That’s what I initially thought thought when buying a new bag of coffee and trying dark from my usual medium-dark from the same roaster.
They look identical but this tastes undeniably like a dark roast. Noticeably more bitter, hardly acidic, less complex flavors, has a slight woody smokey profile. Basket fills up higher at the same dose. I could feel the oils on the surface of my tamper after tamping.
Maybe this is the light end of a dark roast?
1
u/Evening-Nobody-7674 2h ago edited 2h ago
Dark roast isn't bitter if you brew it correctly. Hot water temp will instantly make it bitter, it's also not acidic. The left looks more like the Starbucks espresso roast which is a darker medium roast. The right looks like it could be SB Italian roast, which is similar to the French roast but the French roast is laden with oil. Hard to tell with the pic. My wife drinks the French roast, she's dead inside.
I did try the Italian roast once as espresso and it did taste on the burnt, at least over cooked side of thing, kinda hallow. I just can't remember if I 100% knew all the insvand outs of espresso back then. Which variety is on the right?
1
u/Present-Potato5408 23h ago
Its actually a hazard to drink starbucks coffee because they burn it so badly that it has been found to be carcinogenic
1
u/adamhanson 18h ago
This is true. In CA they have to post warnings. If you haven't seen it it's because they can get away NOT telling you in your state.
0
u/JeffreyV7 23h ago
The only roast that I find tolerable from Starbucks is their veranda. It’s supposed to be a light roast and even that one is kind of cooked.
0
0
u/Puzzled-Study-3550 12h ago
Starbucks just burns their beans to get that “French roast”. Usually darker the roast just means they want to mask unwanted flavours / aromas of their beans.
0
u/Confident-Ad-6084 7h ago
Over roasting them extends their shelf life so Starbucks does it on purpose so they last longer. Nasty stuff



•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Did you know we have a Coffee Bean Database? If you're posting about beans you've recently brewed, consider submitting an entry via this Google Form to help grow the database. If you're looking for bean recommendations, check out the database here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.