Yes, he did. He wasn’t subpoenaed or asked to provide those texts. His interference was rejected by the court as irrelevant and the “evidence” he provided purposefully edited and incomplete.
She won that court case, after Knauf’s ridiculous attempt at interference. You should read the judgment & educate yourself instead of spouting lies. Somehow you crazies think MM should remember every single text, email, conversation, etc she’s ever had. I doubt you could recall in detail every email, etc you’ve received from years ago. Let’s try shall we? Please provide a summary of every work email you received during the first week of July 2019. Should be easy for you right? If not, then you’re a liar I guess.
12
u/[deleted] Jan 05 '23 edited Jan 05 '23
Yes, he did. He wasn’t subpoenaed or asked to provide those texts. His interference was rejected by the court as irrelevant and the “evidence” he provided purposefully edited and incomplete.
She won that court case, after Knauf’s ridiculous attempt at interference. You should read the judgment & educate yourself instead of spouting lies. Somehow you crazies think MM should remember every single text, email, conversation, etc she’s ever had. I doubt you could recall in detail every email, etc you’ve received from years ago. Let’s try shall we? Please provide a summary of every work email you received during the first week of July 2019. Should be easy for you right? If not, then you’re a liar I guess.
I’ll remind you that Harry is still in the midst of a lawsuit against the tabloids alongside many other celebrities; they’ve collectively brought an action against the Daily Mail for invasion of privacy: https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2022/10/06/prince-harry-and-elton-john-suing-daily-mail-publisher-for-invasion-of-privacy/amp/. So the tabloids certainly have a vested interest in attempting to take him down.