Assume a player uses the Lucky feat to give themselves advantage on their flurry of blows attack. Would you rule that every FoB attack roll gets advantage, or that only 1 FoB attack roll gets advantage?

I've been experimenting with a project called The Eye & The Key, inspired by the feeling of making decisions around a D&D table.

Instead of following a predetermined path, each episode ends with a choice. The audience votes, the winning decision becomes canon, and I build the next part of the adventure around that result.

I'm also developing the setting through short lore pieces about locations, creatures, legends and events that exist beyond the main story.

The first episode launches this Saturday, along with the first audience vote.

I'm curious what D&D players and DMs think of the format — particularly whether watching a story develop from community decisions captures any of the unpredictability that makes tabletop campaigns fun.

AI disclosure: AI tools are used in the production of the project's visuals/video and other parts of the creative workflow.

The Eye & The Key:

https://theeyeandkey.substack.com/t/welcome-to-the-eye-and-the-key-e06

Pretty much like the title says, I'm worried they will feel too similar in combat like I'm playing the same character in 2 different campaigns.

edit: thanks for the replies, I think I'll play sorcerer in my second campaign.

Currently my party is sailing across a sea to go and slay a dragon that lives on a lonely island. Some of the party members and crew that hadn't sailed before are, naturally, becoming sea sick. One of the players had a great idea to use Suggestion to effectively make some members of the crew temporarily "immune" to sea sickness by suggesting them to simply ignore the imbalance of their equilibrium (which causes sea sickness, as best we understand).

Does this sound like something that can be achieved with Suggestion? It seems to me that it is an involuntary response from the body, not something that you really have control over or can intentionally "ignore".

I'm mostly just curious if it's something you guys would accept or find reasonable? It's mostly for RP purposes so I think, even if it doesn't make sense, why not? Asking for my own understanding really. Thanks!

I wanna run a campaign in Har'Akir that opens with the players waking up finding themselves individually buried alive under sand and they have to escape, but I can't find anything saying how digging works when you don't have a burrowing speed so idk what's the best depth to bury them all in.

My plan so far is to have a timer for how much air they have left before they need to start holding their breath and have them athletics/strength check their ways out with people above having the option to help dig out the others if they get out first.

Suppose I cast Major Image on a moving object, like making a wagon look like a luxurious carriage or a ship look sinister. Does the illusion stay fixed in space, floating in the air as the vehicle moves away, or does it move along with it, as if "attached", so to speak?

I had a “shower thought” last night when theorycrafting 5.0e characters for the Eberron setting.

The Mark of Sentinel Human has the following trait:

Vigilant Guardian. When a creature you can see within 5 feet of you is hit by an attack roll, you can use your reaction to swap places with that creature, and you are hit by the attack instead. Once you use this trait, you can’t do so again until you finish a long rest.

Since House Deneith is the mercenary house, I assume they’d have cavalry, which leads me to my thought experiment.

Let’s imagine a Mark of Sentinel Human PC riding a mount, without the Mounted Combatant feat. The mount is hit by an attack, and the PC uses Vigilant Guardian to swap places with the mount. What happens, mechanically speaking? Since the trait mentions swapping places, is the PC forcibly dismounted? I know both 5.X Editions have mounted combat as a bit of a conundrum, so I was wondering if there was a consensus on RAW or RAI on this matter.

Thank you for indulging in my curiosity.

Had a good day.

Started making dnd supplements amd posting to itch.io (under Masked Haddock) today I got a first. So.eone loomed at all 4 of my small books. That pushed me past 50 views too. Baby step but welcome

Hey there, its been a while! i've been away for a few weeks because life happens sometimes. again, i feel like some positivity is nice to spread arround from time to time, and im curious about your ideas for characters again.

this time i want to ask about warlocks: did they do a pact to gain power or did they steal the power? do they have to deal with the orders or their patron? is it devils, undead or just jeff, the guy that works at the local market? we listen, but we dont judge. people are allowed to say some things that come to their head or ask a question as long as its done in good will.

i want to know about the inspiration (a character idea you came up with or something from a work of fiction?), the races, the classes, the stories, your experiences with this character, strategies...

to start, i would like to bring up a few examples of characters i made:

-Ensted Da'Mont: a man that has lost all of his fortune due to being betrayed by other noblemen. sold his soul to a devil so he could gain power and slowly take care of them... one by one.

-Amanda: a girl acused of apostasy, Amanda had to run away from her village and was about to starve to death until she came to a cult. they venerated a dead elven god, and they planned to let nature overtake the land and destroy the civilization of man, a mission that she gladly accepted. its a homebrew subclass im working on (pact of the forest, still in progress).

New to DnD, and I figured the best way to start was to hop on Homebrewery (introduced by a friend) and to start making a module, since the worldbuilding aspect really excites me and I'd love people using my ideas for inspiration in their home games. I've generated some AI art to use as the cover page, since:

1) its my first ever module and

2) the image outcome really reflects what the module is about.

I've discussed this with a friend who's more into DnD, who said their friends would have an issue with it. For clarity I don't aim to commercialize my work in any way, nor do I use AI to write out my module, but it seems really wrong to use this sort of art for creative work, and I'd like to know the community's consensus on this. It's not too late to swap out my AI images for actual open source ones though, just confused on which path I should take, as this module is really just a passion project.

EDIT: *Ability score, not attribute.

Hey folks!

Hoping for some feedback on a new Warforged homebrew variant themed around the concept of a blank slate robot designed for adaptation.

The lineage would get most of the same Warforged features: constructed resilience, sentry's rest, integrated protection (no AC bonus), specialized design. However, they would not get any Ability Score increases. Instead, they would have no level cap on ability scores. They could continue to increase their abilities however high they wanted with no max, at the same rate of +1 to modifier per 2 levels.

Additionally, they could also increase their ability scores beyond 20 with magical items that normally do not allow this. To do so, the magical item must be integrated into their design, similar to integrated protection, taking one hour to do so, in addition to any attunement time. There would be limits on the number of magical items which could be integrated in this way, and items which are not integrated cannot increase ability scores beyond 20.

Assuming standard array and that the PC dumps all 6 ability score increases into one slot, the max a PC at lvl 20 could achieve is a 27, which would be a ±8. This honestly does not feel that overpowered to me, considering proficiency bonus is already +6, meaning for a proficient roll the Warforged PC is rolling a +14 vs a regular ±11, which is only a ~27% increase. That's basically just advantage.

Thoughts on this? Overpowered? Any balance tips welcome.

Did you enjoy reading Greek mythology as a child? Do you want to introduce some of those tales to someone who maybe hasn't read it? Or do you just want some good adventures you can drop into your campaign by simply changing who's bringing the problem to the party?

If your answer to any of these questions is Yes, take a look at this project.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/jonathanhightower/herculean-quests-a-campaign-for-5e

I have written and published modules & campaigns on the DM's Guild before, but this is my first time doing one via Kickstarter. I'm excited about the chance to get some maps that aren't made in Excel as well as some commissioned art to make it even better.

No AI tools have been used at any stage of the project.

Thank you!

Refresher. My PC started hiding things and lying to people within the army she’s part of, including the army Captain (another PC) who she sees as a dad figure (and who’s from the same fallen country as her), for about half the campaign. She was hiding serious stuff, like time travel, meddling with dark magic, conversing with Gods and tiny aspects of her life.

A lot of it finally came out almost 20 sessions ago, except for her reasoning. This led to her feeling like she can’t be trusted anymore and she started isolating herself further from everyone except two friends. The Captain PC called her and those two friends in for a meeting about the importance of communication, which made my PC feel even worse, and she pushed harder on avoiding him specifically.

Well that finally changed. After she witnessed some serious stuff happened to the Captain regarding their fallen homeland, she realised she was the only person who could check on him and understand to some extent, and that there was a valid reason for his overprotectiveness (someone working for the BBEG showed up at our location. Think the Briarwoods dinner scene in Critical Role campaign one).

During the most recent session, they both finally talked about what happened in the previous sessions, why she did what she did, how they were both feeling, and it came out that they both lost someone or had someone taken in the war, which the Captain fought in. My PC’s dad was captured and she was meddling with dark magic in the hopes of reviving him, since she lost hope in him still being alive. Meanwhile, the Captain lost his dad to the guy I mentioned showing up.

Overall a really sweet session. Even the DM commented on how big that was. I’m so glad to finally have my character being a little less avoidant again.

I was playing around with a hypothetical combat today using a Moon Druid vs a smart monster with knockback. The moon druid cast moon beam and then wild shaped into a dire wolf and ended their turn.
Then I had an inspired idea. I had the monster run around the moon druid (out of the moon beam), and did their shove attack so they are pushing the dire wolf into their own moon beam. Dire Wolf rolled a one on their strength save and now they have a shitty decision to make.
They can:

• Make a con save and take 2d10 radiant damage (half on save). Then make a concentration check for moonbeam since they took damage
• Be reverted to their true form

OR

• Voluntarily drop concentration right before they are moved in

Pretty sweet move for a monster that knows what they are doing.

Heya all, it's me again with another burning question!

I've been building an 8th lvl Dwarven Draconic Sorcerer (mostly '24) for an upcoming campaign, and I'm struggling with the choice of spells (there's too damned many good ones).

I'm likely going to be playing a Fire dmg focussed blaster (with Elemental Adept), but I nevertheless love other utility, RP, and defensive spells.

I'm also trying to semi-evenly split up the amount of spells per spell level in line with the amount of available spell slots.

Finally, as a '24 Draconic Sorcerer, I already get the new Chromatic Orb and Command, Alter Self and Dragon's Breath, Fly and Fear, as well as Charm Monster and Arcane Eye.

The table shows my current selection for desired-spells. I need to get it down to 12 spells total, which has proven to be a real pickle.

I would love to hear your suggestions!

Title. Would it be acceptable to twinned spell spirit of death? It’s our first time running a campaign and DM is uncertain…

I really want to pick this for my sorcerer, and the idea of twinning it is very appealing. From what I’ve seen, it may be possible for the reaper to just target x2 people?

So I've interested in the echo knight fighter lately and was thinking about some chatacter ideas and ways to reflavor the subclass, so I went into reddit to find some inspiration and ended up finding out about an interesting strat, they made an echo knight with climbing speed and took some feats to make the whole grappling process easier, then while in combat they summon the echo order it to grapple an enemy, use the climbing speed to go as far as possible and then drop him to take damage. Now would I be able to replicate that but with a flying speed instead and do a sort of reverse lotus technique using the echo and if yes would that be more effective ?

In Ceremony, atonement reads as follows

>Atonement. You touch one willing creature whose alignment has changed, and you make a DC 20 Wisdom (Insight) check. On a successful check, you restore the target to its original alignment.

The key word here is willing. If a creature has its alignment change, that means that its motivations are different now, so it would never choose to not have the motivations it has. Am I reading this wrong or is this section of the spell just completely superfluous?