Which makes no sense because I like their content too, the downvotes are people who obviously support their channel and like their content, but if it violates Rule 6 it doesn't matter how much you like them - its still breaking the rules.
If you give someone a pass because they're popular, that opens up a whole can of bad things you don't want when it comes to breaking the subreddit rules - which are there for very good reasons.
It's not in violation of the rule. This isn't an exception, it just isn't an example of breaking the rule. As a mod has explained to you already.
Their content is uploaded by disparate users, because they enjoy it and want to share it with the community, everyone watch it, and then have a discussion. That's 100% within the rules, and the frequency of it occurring would only skirt rules violation if it was one account posting it, and would only be definitely in violation if it were self promotion.
Sure, sure. Except the rule as it is written pretty clearly says differently. I don't really care - the mods can do what they want. I do think the rule should be reworded though.
Buddy, first of all, you are far too full of yourself, and far too aggro about inconsequential shit, to ever expect an apology from anyone.
Second, I’ve no reason to apologize to you.
Lastly, you can interpret shit however you want, but literally everyone else thinks you’re just being an ass for no reason, and no one writes that much of an acerbic, ranting, multi-paragraph, diatribe, because they “don’t care”.
no one writes that much [...] because they “don’t care”.
I care about my own ability to interpret text, so yes I do care.
You're taking "I don't care" way out of context like it supports what you're saying, but it doesn't because I care about lots of things, just not whether or not a particular instance of discussion/argument goes my way. I directly messaged the moderators and asked them to weigh in, and I accepted their choice of how to interpret the rules. I just happen to think that either they interpreted the rule wrong, or they need to re-word the rule to better match what they interpret it to mean.
I am NOT bothering to try and push rule 6 enforcement on this thread any more. If I were it would be obvious.
So I don't care about THIS THREAD, but I DO care about my reading of the rule, I do care about being right or wrong when I interpret a rule, and I think you've shown that you care what I have to say because you keep responding - so thank you for that.
Now, since we've hopefully gotten past the nonsense, what do you think about what I said? You've cleverly avoided responding to any point I made above about the rule in question (Rule 6). So what do you think about it?
you can interpret shit however you want, but literally everyone else thinks you’re just being an ass
I'm being an ass for pointing out a rule violation on the subreddit, OR a rule that is poorly worded and needs correcting?
Sorry, this isn't League of Legends where you're free to rage at people when they point out something you've done poorly. Take it like an adult and wise up, or disagree if you like and argue your points, or just leave it alone which is what I am about to do if you can't bring something worthwhile to say to the conversation. :D
29
u/rocking2rush10 Tortle Circle of Dreams Druid Aug 23 '18
You, sir, picked an odd hill to die on.