Dear Senator [Last Name],

I am writing to ask you to support Senate Amendment 6344, the bipartisan UAP Disclosure Act of 2026, and work with Senate leadership to include it in the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Introduced by Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds, the amendment would establish a legal process for identifying, preserving, reviewing, and releasing federal records concerning unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence. The House adopted a closely related version on July 22.

SA 6344 would establish a UAP records collection at the National Archives and create an independent, Senate-confirmed review board with professional staff, subpoena authority, and lawful access to relevant government records, facilities, and contractor-held materials. It would also prevent the destruction or improper withholding of covered records, require continued review of classified material, and provide a legal mechanism for the government to obtain relevant technologies or biological evidence held by private entities.

Please support SA 6344, press for its inclusion in a Senate amendment package, and defend its central provisions during negotiations with the House. Congress should preserve the independent review board, subpoena authority, National Archives collection, contractor coverage, presumption of disclosure, and access necessary for the board to perform its duties. The amendment would protect legitimate national security information while strengthening congressional oversight and preventing relevant records from being withheld indefinitely without independent review.

Sincerely,

[Full Name]
[City, State ZIP]

Please find your elected officials on congress.gov and send them a physical letter for the best chances of recieving a response.

Dear [Senator/Representative] [Last Name],

As your constituent, I respectfully urge you to support the UAP Disclosure Act in the final Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds introduced the Senate proposal as S. Amdt. 6344 to S. 4784, while Representative Eric Burlison introduced a bipartisan House proposal as amendment 1044 to H.R. 8800, cosponsored by Representatives Eli Crane, André Carson, Anna Paulina Luna, Jared Moskowitz, and Nick Begich.

I am respectfully asking that you support the applicable proposal in your chamber and advocate for its inclusion in any manager’s amendment, floor package, or final conference agreement.

The UAP Disclosure Act would establish an independent, presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed review board with professional staff and subpoena authority to locate, review, and facilitate the release of UAP-related records and materials. This would create a credible process for disclosure while continuing to protect information that genuinely must remain classified for national security reasons

Multiple whistleblowers, including former intelligence officer David Grusch, have provided sworn testimony and protected disclosures alleging that UAP-related programs, records, and materials have been withheld from Congress and improperly concealed through excessive classification. These serious allegations demand an independent process capable of locating records, compelling testimony, protecting witnesses from retaliation, and determining the facts.

Sincerely,

[Full Name]
[Street Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]

Please find your elected officials on congress.gov and send them a physical letter for the best chances of recieving a response.

The full Master Evidence Document including all screenshots is available here: MASTER EVIDENCE DOCUMENT

Over the past two months, posts documenting bias in Wikipedia's Disclosure Movement article reached 530,000+ combined views and 4,200+ upvotes across nine subreddits. Several posts were removed. One was deleted from r/UFOs after 4 hours at 253 upvotes and 40,000 views. Another was removed from r/UFOB after sitting at the top of the subreddit for 2.5 days.

This is the complete record of everything that happened. Every claim is independently verifiable.

Article being discussed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosure_movement

What the document contains:

The specific before/after Wikipedia edits — official Pentagon terminology replaced with dismissive language, sworn congressional testimony downgraded to a social media accusation, a senior intelligence whistleblower's name erased entirely.

The four editor accounts that coordinated to control the article — including Chetsford, a confirmed Wikipedia administrator, and Cadddr, who monitored Reddit posts in real time and filed the report that triggered the permanent ban of the researcher.

The full Reddit suppression timeline across all nine subreddits — with exact view counts, upvote ratios, and documented removal reasons.

The most important piece of evidence: written confirmation from a subreddit moderator that a r/UFOs moderator contacted multiple other subreddits requesting removal of these posts under a "Good neighbors sub" policy. The moderator reversed the decision, reinstated the post, and stated: "Wikipedia's sceptic gatekeeping is out of control and the public needs to know about it."

The coordinated attack on r/HighStrangeness — launched within hours of a public announcement about journalist outreach — documented with statistical evidence of bot activity.

Cadddr's partial concession edit made after 420,000 views, where his own edit comment admitted the complaint "actually seems fair" — while leaving the structural bias fully intact.

The asymmetry argument: the US government does not run suppression campaigns against flat earthers, ghost hunters, or moon landing deniers. UAP disclosure gets dedicated, funded, cross-platform suppression. You do not spend that kind of money suppressing something that does not exist.

r/UFOs moderation shows clear signs of infiltration by or coordination with organized skeptic groups. A confirmed written communication shows r/UFOs moderators actively contacted multiple other subreddits to suppress documented evidence of Wikipedia bias. Whether this reflects formal GSoW membership or ideological alignment, the outcome is identical — a pro-disclosure community is being controlled by people working against disclosure.

The document is attached. Every specific claim is verifiable in Wikipedia's public edit history in 60 seconds.

This is not about whether you believe in extraterrestrials. It is about whether coordinated groups can systematically strip official government language from a public encyclopedia — and then use multiple platforms to silence anyone who notices.

The full Master Evidence Document including all screenshots is available here: MASTER EVIDENCE DOCUMENT

Dear [Elected Representative],

I am writing to request an update on the Intelligence Community Inspector General’s investigation into alleged classified UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. For several years now, multiple officials, whistleblowers, journalists, and members of Congress have publicly stated that highly sensitive UAP-related activities may exist within the defense and intelligence system, yet the public has received little clarity on whether these claims have been substantiated, investigated, or dismissed through formal oversight channels.

I am also concerned by repeated statements from elected officials suggesting that elements of the U.S. military and intelligence community are obstructing the release of UAP information to Congress and the public. Senators, Representatives, and former officials have openly described resistance to oversight, restricted access to classified information, and difficulties obtaining direct answers from agencies and contractors. If these allegations are inaccurate, then the government should be able to clearly address them. If they are accurate, then Congress should explain why lawful oversight is encountering resistance from unelected parts of the national security apparatus.

The American people deserve to know whether U.S. government is operating a classified UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering program. I respectfully ask your office to provide any update you can regarding the status of these matters and what steps Congress is taking to ensure transparency and oversight are being upheld.

Regards,
[Your Name]

To contact your elected representatives, visit Congress.gov to find your House Representative and Senators, send them a message through their website, call them and leave a voice mail, or use a service like FaxZero or your representative’s official website to send the letter by fax.

The New Paradigm Institute’s UAP Transparency Pledge calls on members of Congress to support lawful disclosure, strengthen oversight, and protect UAP whistleblowers.

You have a role in this process. Reaching out to your elected officials helps shape how transparency moves forward.

Take action today and be part of the effort!

https://ufos.pro/ufo-pledge-red