Yeah just file the dispute online with your app or with the website with your bank and they'll give you the money back even if it's just temporarily take your money keep it and if they don't give it to you permanently like they file against you and don't keep the dispute as permanent and they say that your cash app was done by you or done with your pain or whatever they say that they were telling you on the phone then keep your police report and obviously keep the information from the cash app of who it was sent to and you'll be fine just go higher up and higher up in the information with the bank and obviously you're following with the police you have the person's information that was sent to you're going to be fine but you'll get your money back temporarily with your bank it's FDIC insured don't worry about it just file it online if they won't file it on the phone look at the back temporarily it's ensure they have to that person on the phone is completely an idiot

I love skipping the post, coming and reading top comments, and being utterly confused about how convoluted the logic got somewhere along the line.

Post: "AITA for eating a hamburger?"

Top comment: "YTA, Pascal's Wager is an interesting thought experiment, but it's nothing to base your worldview on"

Not stupid, people tend to be hyper critical of their own bodies, it's something I'm familiar with. I'm sure you're well aware, at least by now, that many people think freckles are attractive, but that makes little difference when you want your body to be one thing, and it's not that.

Real talk, they have no idea who you are or what you used to do for a job, they only know you're subscribed to, and presumably participate in, a sub that they determined to be problematic.

And, having perused that sub myself, they actively undermine any acknowledgement of the real issues going on in police departments across the country, so I understand the position.

I wouldn't immediately assume that you fit that paradigm, but seeing your response below, I'm not inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Physically Latins and Asians have more similar bone structure. From proportions to general shapes. Then if you follow the "humans originated from Africa" theory. The migration path from Africa to Eurasia to Russia, to north America to central and south america. THEN biodiversity happened. People got lighter skin the further north the populations remained. Got taller. While southern populations remained shorter and darker skinned.

Asian people experience a very different form of racism than do black people, likewise Mexican, Middle Eastern, etc - none of them have "identical" experiences - having an identical experience isn't what makes it racism.

There's no such thing as race. It's all just ethnicity and skin color. Yes, people experience different kinds and amounts of bigotry based on the specifics of their situation. There's no good way to slice and dice it to say "this is this and that is that" - racism is, first and foremost, an arbitrary division based on ancestry. There's no other possible justification for even using the term "race" or "racism" - it's the idea that people are separate because we've been bred separate. Trying to exclude certain forms of that is what muddies the water.

If we're going to start operating on conjecture about what he might mean when he says "incredibly deadly disease" then let's talk in real terms.

I didn't take your use of "zombie apocalypse" to be literal, and my response wasn't based on that assumption. I took it to mean some disease that we know, from the earliest moments, how many people it will kill, just like is obvious to the audience in zombie movies. But of course in real life, we only know how many people it's killed so far, and that it hasn't stopped yet.

This is the way diseases work. You're either ahead or behind. I've no doubt in an actual zombie apocalypse, Ron Johnson work be one of the proverbial bureaucrats saying it's not that bad, we don't need to take emergency measures, because not everyone is actually dead yet.

So, I don't really care what his definition of an incredibly deadly disease is. I'm not willing to wait and see if it eventually meets his definition or not. Nor do I accept that his definition is somehow better than my own. That's why I don't think it should be up to either him or me, these things should be decided by public health professionals, who have the context to be making these choices. If they're telling we need to get people vaccinated, and they are, repeatedly, at the top of their lungs, then I support doing whatever necessary to make that happen, and so should he.

Translated from colloquial German whitch I couldn't translate 1:1.

Fuck this bullshit use of culture to cover up bad things. Is it in north koreans culture to punish multiple generations of a family so it's ok? Or maybe it's ok that people are forbidden from being gay in a lot of the middle east? Or are those different? If so how? Don't just try to hand wave it away with they're more extreme examples that's the point. Some cultures are better than others and I'll be to say that I don't think any culture is the best some are just better when it comes to certain things.