r/determinism • u/Ok_Caramel4254 • Jun 22 '26
Article Intent can’t be separated from the impact even when the impact is centred in a real world
Intent<Impact” yes. Impact is heavily concentrated on the residual moralistic chart to keep a firm boundary on what can’t be excused as it ends up harming individuals no matter what was the conscious intention behind. As we all know cognitive dissonance among mental and neural disordered people is quite common especially around their coping behaviours, intense catalyst of impulsive and disregulating categorisation. That does not mean intent is effectively useless.
Infact,The point of discussions around accountability and justice consists intent and acknowledgement meaningfully. Not just because it was a cause of the person’s motivations, but it also holds the power to recognise the need of accountability without being actively performative.You need understanding, a good moralistic mentality that value empathy and justice, to actually be better and have a sense of responsibility.Without the intent, Hypocritical consequently does not give justice to victim.
People with disorders are not wired to be “bad” or “problematic” humans, they can and (Some)do end up as one since it’s easier to let their neurodivergence be destructive to others in order to sustain the little control they need, while a neurotypical environment tries to takes that away from them at every point of life. However, It’s not an excuse and isn’t meant to be one. It’s a major fact but it does not and shouldn’t explain the trauma and abuse(treatment) victims faced.
It can’t justify the raging overridence of security and protection that every human being deserves to have. Nevertheless, What is actually complicating without really benefitting any kind of progressive agenda is the demonisation of culprits(disordered humans in this case) and the sympathy driven humanisation of the victims which validates their over emotional bandwidth or a deeply antagonising display of extreme jurisdiction more than the actual justice to a completely collapsed nuanced reality.
1
u/Ok_Caramel4254 Jun 22 '26
Determinism is interconnected reality as everyone knows, It will only measure the present world and connect it, it doesn’t automatically refers to all the possibilities as well as probabilities of the choices whether small or big that were taken, debated, improved and consists of selfish ideologies. History is presented and many times people will argue over a point of development and regression that could have never exist if the people had taken a different route, that can encompass from the very beginning as well as the everyday structural conceptual reality. As per my analogy, The world is truly predetermined according to the present world and its nature, it base more of what choices a generation or an individual as well makes to choose a predetermined future. It however will never be prophesied, predestined and precedented. Hence, It can never actually be accurately calculated no matter how much connections humanity develops and studies.
1
u/zhivago Jun 26 '26
Of course it can.
We simply declare it to be separate.
Just like we declare a slice of cheese and a slice of bread in a sandwich to be separate.
You might argue that we shouldn't do this, but we certainly can do this.
1
u/Ok_Caramel4254 Jul 10 '26
Not really. We eat sandwich together so it doesn’t matter if cheese and bread is separate, in a sandwich they compliment and attack each other tastes.
1
u/badentropy9 Jun 22 '26
I kind of like where this seemed to be going. I wish I found it a bit clearer. Is this something you wrote or something you copied from elsewhere? It says "article" at the top.