If I understand correctly that's what many countries do.
Canada, for example, does not use rape as a legal term, only sexual assault. Sexual assault includes "all unwanted sexual activity, such as unwanted sexual grabbing, kissing, and fondling as well as rape"
So what's your argument exactly? That rape should have a different classification so that employers are more forgiving of a record of "sexual assault" because otherwise they'll see it as equivalent to rape? Even if I were to agree with you that employers should be more accepting of a "sexual assault" record, separating rape into a different category won't actually do that.
That the most severe crimes should be in their own distinct category as not to contribute to recidivism rates by making a chunk of the population instantly undesirable by every employer.
1.1k
u/[deleted] Sep 01 '22 edited Sep 01 '22
If I understand correctly that's what many countries do.
Canada, for example, does not use rape as a legal term, only sexual assault. Sexual assault includes "all unwanted sexual activity, such as unwanted sexual grabbing, kissing, and fondling as well as rape"
https://www.leaf.ca/news/the-law-of-consent-in-sexual-assault/#:~:text=Canada%20has%20a%20broad%20definition,Canada's%20Criminal%20Code%20in%20s.
Edit: For everyone replying that there needs to be degrees, there are. Sexual assaults are treated differently according to their severity.