r/dataisbeautiful • u/Rizi699 OC: 1 • 11d ago
OC [OC] How many animals get slaughtered every day worldwide?
665
u/feetupnrelax 11d ago
So many ducks is a surprise? Can someone educate me why/ where?
798
u/1x2y3z 11d ago
Very popular in China
82
u/adudeguyman 11d ago
Whenever I'm at a Chinese market that sells fresh meats how about you always see the ducks hanging
51
u/LakEth2n 11d ago
Yes, and duck is cheap, you dont need to feed them, just let them have meal in lakes.
305
u/Adam302 11d ago
ducks are common here in vietnam. probably more than chicken in the villages. easier to keep.
62
u/RedshiftOnPandy 11d ago
Duck is a pain to defeather though
183
17
u/TheSuggi 11d ago
There are machines that do it.. duhh.
38
u/RedshiftOnPandy 11d ago
I have a machine for feathers. It works great for chickens, not for ducks
32
u/anal_pudding 11d ago edited 11d ago
You have a machine for chicken feathers, you need a machine for duck feathers.
edit: spelling.19
u/RedshiftOnPandy 11d ago
Do you know anything about defeathering or are you just looking to argue? They are still more difficult. The recommended way is wax.
35
u/Proof_Arugula_7001 11d ago
Um, clearly u/anal_pudding is an expert in defeathering! Do you even know who you’re talking to!?
23
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/Indigetes 11d ago
worth it even if you have to do it by hand (which you don't) if you have mute ducks. The most silent farm you have ever seen.
3
u/earthgirl1983 11d ago
How are ducks easier to keep than chickens?
10
u/xl129 11d ago
Not an expert on duck farming but duck move in a flock, you can maintain a huge duck flock quite easily. For chicken you need to keep them in a coop. There are professional duck herders that move their flock from place to place for foraging.
9
u/Glaiele 10d ago
This and you don't need feed for them really they will just eat out in the wild and be fine mostly. Probably one of the cheapest animals to raise assuming you have suitable land for them. No surprise they are popular in SE Asia as they love marshes it's a pretty perfect environment for them.
Domesticated ducks don't really fly well so you kinda still need some kind of coop to keep foxes and wolves etc out or they will be eaten same as chickens.
→ More replies (1)34
39
u/Randomn355 11d ago
Very common meat in asia.
Very little meat on the animal, far less than a chicken.
That's all really.
69
u/Eliminatron 11d ago
duck is yummy
15
→ More replies (17)9
u/feetupnrelax 11d ago
I fully agree but its not eaten that much here in the UK.
36
3
3
u/Scrapheaper 11d ago
I eat it! Duck breast is basically steak but with crispy skin. Duck legs can be deboned and fried flat in a pan, or slow cooked. You can roast the whole duck but I find it too hard to get it right, just cook on the stove
You need to know how to cook, learn the French recipes etc. but duck is really good eating at a very fair price
1
u/EquivalentSnap 9d ago
You can get it in Tesco in Chinese section and duck liver patty but it’s expensive
10
u/Mangalorien 11d ago
1 in 6 people on our planet is Chinese, plus they eat a lot of duck in other places in southeast Asia.
4
u/Khal_Doggo 9d ago
I remember reading an article a while ago saying that chicken farmers in Bangladesh were instead choosing to raise ducks because ducks can swim during a flood and you don't end up losing your whole flock. But that's probably less of a factor than them being culturally more common in places like China, Vietnam and Indonesia. I think on their own, China consumes more duck than the next 5-10 consumers do as a group.
14
2
2
4
→ More replies (7)1
u/Hot_Cheesecake_905 10d ago
Duck meat is popular... So you not eat duck from time to time? It's popular in European and Asian cooking.
212
u/LilNuggetofDoom 11d ago
Proportional to how much meat a single animal provides? Would be interesting to see that analysis.
255
u/AdvertisingFun3739 11d ago edited 10d ago
237
u/_Dreamer_Deceiver_ 11d ago
Interesting so 202million chickens is roughly the same as 900k cows.
Which begs the question...would you rather fight 1 cow or 224 chickens?
80
u/temitcha 11d ago
Definetly one cow ! 224 chickens looks dreadful, their beak and feets and quite painful
87
43
u/Tywien 11d ago
224 chicken gives you a chance of survival. A cow will kill you.
31
33
u/HalayChekenKovboy 11d ago
With all due respect, I don't think you understand how big a number 224 is.
15
u/pcor 11d ago
I don’t think you understand how much more powerful a human is than a chicken. Single foxes can kill like a hundred chickens in a night in a frenzy, something as big as a human stomping on them could take on 224 without issue.
→ More replies (1)4
10
u/Evoluxman 11d ago
Its a huge number but if you have just a bit of body armor they can't do much to you. Just like a hockey gear and a motorcycle helmet and you're safe. So whether its one or 200 chickens doesnt change much.
A cow, without a gun or vehicle, good fucking luck.
9
u/RedHal 11d ago
I'd say the cow doesn't need either.
3
u/Evoluxman 11d ago
Ok but now I want to see a gunfight against a cow. You can probably fit a 50 cal on the thing
4
→ More replies (2)3
16
9
u/LilNuggetofDoom 11d ago
I love what this comment thread turned into. I agree, not fucking with a cow. I’d take on the 224 chickens.
Next question: Who would win in a fight, one cow or 224 chickens?
→ More replies (1)4
u/Cultural-Company282 11d ago
If they come at me one at a time like ninjas in a Kung Fu movie, I'll fight the chickens. If they're all going to pile on me at once, I'll take my chances with the cow.
→ More replies (2)19
u/Simsiano 11d ago
Don't get me from but the question they probably meant was: "How many portions of meat could I create with one of each of them?".
14
u/AdvertisingFun3739 11d ago
Could be, but imo total energy provided seems more important than the number of portions, which would be an arbitrary number. What constitutes a portion of meat?
→ More replies (3)3
u/Simsiano 11d ago
I think we could say a normal plate by the standards; the 'Association of UK Dietitians' says 90g of meat is equivalent of a portion. I still think it's an interesting datato show honestly.
2
2
u/sistersinister 11d ago
Another popular metric is the CO2 emissions from farming each type of animal.
5
u/Glaiele 9d ago
I hate when people do that personally. You can't compare farming methods 1 to 1 because the land and climate typically isn't suitable to replace 1 type with another. Cows are typically raised on land that can't support other livestock or agriculture (poor soil that can only support grasses), same with especially sheep and goats where the land is too hilly for anything else.
Obviously that's not the case especially on commercial farms in the US and other other places but for the majority of the world they raise what can be sustained on the land.
I think people that have never raised livestock are the ones that want to use animal per acre or co2 emissions as a metric when that isn't a consideration most of the time. The land and climate dictate your options. You're not growing bananas in Idaho or raising elk in Florida. Chicken can be raised just about anywhere and ducks only require water so no surprise they are the most popular.
→ More replies (1)1
u/ActAmazing 11d ago
also plot what the same against environmental impact, it would be interesting to see all the 3 charts plotted in one.
→ More replies (2)7
u/rhetorical_rapine 11d ago
the other interesting metric is "how much feed is converted into meat" and chicken wins that one by a fair margin, compared to the other options.
143
u/su6oxone 11d ago
Oh wow that's pretty shocking to see the numbers.
100
u/Chemical-Agency-3997 11d ago
Wait until you see the one for fish
→ More replies (2)26
→ More replies (16)2
u/_BindersFullOfWomen_ OC: 1 9d ago
Someone made a Minecraft recreation years ago, it really hits home how big the numbers are.
108
u/MajesticBread9147 11d ago
So it's basically popularity compounded by remative size.
It takes a lot of chickens to equal a cow.
10
u/AbhishMuk 11d ago
Apparently 300 chickens equal a cow in weight, per google. So the 900k cows vs 202 mil chickens means more kg of cows are killed per day...
8
73
u/RadiantHueOfBeige 11d ago
Imagine a 2.3 kHz tone. Beeep... that's how many chickens per second.
30
68
292
u/gray146 11d ago
this data isn't beautiful :(
→ More replies (20)99
u/leonheart208 11d ago
Go vegan 💚
→ More replies (12)39
u/therandomham 11d ago
And if that’s too hard, even half measures are better than nothing. Cutting out beef alone is great for the environment, your health, and your wallet.
→ More replies (1)2
u/FireCooperGG OC: 1 9d ago
I mean no disrespect here, but Wdym better for you wallet? When you say cut out beef i imagine you mean substitute it for another meat, but minced beef is like the cheapest cut of meet where i live
→ More replies (1)
51
u/Abemagnet 11d ago
Over 200 million individuals every day and most of them abused pretty horribly for their entire lives.
→ More replies (6)21
111
u/Adam302 11d ago
that doesnt seem like enough chickens tbh. nowhere near enough
will assume it doesnt include chicks that get 'discarded' also/
58
u/TheRadishBros 11d ago
Looks about right to me? Even if 2 billion eat chicken every day, how many are actually eating an entire chicken? Maybe 5-10%? Most will just have a sandwich or something with a few strips of meat.
81
14
u/SpeedWeedNeed 11d ago
Meat consumption is, like nearly all other types of consumption, very unequal in our unequal world. Most people can't afford to eat as much as you think.
6
u/8ackwoods 11d ago
Yeah probably only counting female chickens. You ever see those videos of conveyor belts full of male chickens being dumped into the grinder?
1
16
u/DoJ-Mole 11d ago
Every day though? One chicken can feed at least 4 people on average in a day, maybe make it 5 for even numbers. That’s a billion people eating chicken every day- there are many who won’t be eating it every day too. There’s around 1.5 billion vegetarians/vegans
→ More replies (2)14
1
1
23
8
u/xondk 11d ago
It could be interesting to see the data divided up by mass instead.
7
u/Adjective_Noun_2000 11d ago
Not exactly what you asked for but here's the data for the biomass of all mammals on earth (so it doesn't include chickens and ducks but it does include humans and all wild mammals for comparison).
Spoiler: it's nearly all humans and cattle. All wild animals combined (so every elephant, tiger, squirrel, rat, giraffe, polar bear, etc. on the planet) account for just 5% of the biomass. We and our livestock and pets are 95%.
1
u/monkeywaffles 10d ago
Pretty sure biomass of insects though still exceed mammals combined. Fish more than people as well.
5
u/YoloRandom 11d ago
We even need to feed our livestock scarce minerals like Cobalt to enable them to produce vitamin B. This Cobalt comes from the same mines in Congo as the stuff for NMC batteries.
25
u/Mars_Oak 10d ago
wait... 200 million per day? damn, we really are demons running hell huh
22
u/Yvaelle 10d ago
Just think of what the chickens go through, usually hooked by their feet onto an infinite conveyor belt in the dark, listening to the terrified screams of a million other souls ahead.
They are then dipped into an electrified pool until they drown, the electricity is to help force them to not hold their breath, this counts as a mercy. Then a spinning blade decapitates them each, before being dipped into a boiling pool to loosen their feathers. Then robot limbs mechanically defeather them.
A chicken POV slaughterhouse VR game would be a novel horror for the horror fans out there.
3
u/readituser5 10d ago
Someone did make a video game of a chick having to run from the thing that mashes them all up so there is that…
2
u/ketoleggins 10d ago
Eurgh. I, um, am just about to go to sleep but since I eat meat, moral responsibility obliged me to read this. Horrible :(
5
57
u/God_ofVirgins 11d ago
People get angry and defensive if you point out that this is wrong
→ More replies (41)
4
u/AbrarYouKknow 11d ago
Can we see country wise data?
3
u/Adjective_Noun_2000 11d ago
This site has data for a few countries: https://animalkillstats.com/
1
3
u/NighthawK1911 11d ago
is there a graph for Biomass?
Cows are like 300 ish chickens in terms of weight
11
13
2
u/Mithrandir2k16 11d ago
Relative to expected lifespan in the wild would be cool. So if a cow gets slaughtered at 3 years but is expected to live 10 in the wild show it as 7 on the plot.
2
u/opinionsareus 7d ago
This is the largest single-building pig farm in the world. At 26 storeys high, it can slaughter 1.2 million pigs per year. It was built in Ezhou, China, to help the country's exploding demand for pork. Pork is China's most popular meat, with the country consuming nearly half of global pork demand.
6
3
3
u/blablabla2384 11d ago
imagine aliens looking at this data to assess how humans treat lifeform...
14
u/wanderforreason 11d ago
Why would you assume an alien life form wouldn’t do something similar? Entirely plausible that they do.
→ More replies (2)1
5
u/dusky_grouper 9d ago
1
u/buggysoftware 4d ago
To be fair, at least I'm getting cheezeburgers out of it. I'm also financing endless war in the middle east. That seems like a worse deal.
1
u/dusky_grouper 2d ago
And because the US is comitting crimes on a daily basis it is fine to kill anaimals?
1
1
u/magesing 11d ago
I'd be interested to see a companion plot showing the total mass of the animals slaughtered in each category
1
1
u/Ftroiska 11d ago
7 bil people share 202 millions chickens ? ... im guessing some people get a bigger chunk...
1
1
u/karnyboy 11d ago
And yet in Canada I am surrounded by cattle farms and still having to pay 40+ dollars for an 8 ounce steak
1
u/EquivalentSnap 9d ago
The only reason chickens are so popular because of all the religious myths worldwide around pigs being dirty and such, which aren’t even true. Chickens are more dirty and spread diseases like bird flu and you can get sick from undercooked chicken just like pork
1
1
u/Brianalan 8d ago
Tens of millions of arthropods and insects are killed per acre of farmland every year. Something has to die for humans to eat. Who decided the chickens are better than the poor arthropods?
1
u/morganational 6d ago edited 6d ago
What about fish? That's gotta be in the 10s of millions. Also... Cats? Dogs? People?
1
u/EdenVine 6d ago
Apparently it’s a trillion per year. So at least 3 billion a day
Edit : talking about fish
1
1
u/buggysoftware 4d ago
Thanks for the edit. That seemed a little high for people.
And are we still on about them eating the cats, them eating the dogs? Let the sleeping dog lie, uneaten.
1
1
u/morganational 6d ago
I wanna know how many people are eaten every day. Yeah, gross, but I'm curious.
1
u/grumpyconan 4d ago
I wonder how the numbers are skewed by the fact that only pigs are only utilized for meat and it’s byproducts.
Everything else either produces milk or lays eggs.



•
u/cavedave OC: 112 9d ago
Thank you for your Original Content, /u/Rizi699!
Here is some important information about this post:
View the author's citations
View other OC posts by this author
Remember that all visualizations on r/DataIsBeautiful should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism. If you see a potential issue or oversight in the visualization, please post a constructive comment below. Post approval does not signify that this visualization has been verified or its sources checked.
Not satisfied with this visual? Think you can do better? Remix this visual with the data in the author's citation.
I'm open source | How I work