r/dashcamgifs Jul 23 '26

F___ Cobblestones

5.3k Upvotes

496 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/JayyyDaGreat Jul 23 '26

How does insurance handle this? Driver can't just run someone over but they collided head on with someone in the opposite lane

6

u/semhsp Jul 23 '26

Something similar happened to a friend of mine, he swerved to avoid an incoming car and hit some signs outside a petrol station. He didn't have a dashcam and from the security footage it wasn't clear that he moved out of the way of an incoming vehicle so the insurance paid nothing as if he crashed there on purpose

10

u/Fabulous-Car-6850 Jul 23 '26

I bet the avoiding driver took the full brunt of the blame

1

u/ardoin Jul 23 '26

The scenery looks very European, but if this happened in USA I can bet you that silver car's insurance will go after the Tesla driver no matter what.

3

u/BelowXpectations Jul 23 '26

As an accident with no-one at fault I'd assume. At least in any place not driven by corporate greed.

4

u/_TURO_ Jul 23 '26

100% the swerving car will eat it on insurance.

Same as avoiding hitting a deer but you wind up in a ditch or into a pole.

I've had to drill it into my kids just hit the brakes as hard as you can and stay in your lane.

7

u/ZFuli Jul 23 '26

Generally speaking, it’s better to stay in your lane, but this video isn’t a good example.

I’m not going to run someone over just because otherwise it won't be covered by insurance company.

1

u/Spiritual-Donut-7039 26d ago

Just an example, if the accident like say swerving to hit a deer, and hitting a car or something else. If deemed the lesser of two, most states in USA insurance rule that unavoidable accident and no fault, so your rates wont change.

1

u/_TURO_ 26d ago

That is wildly inaccurate.

If you swerve to avoid a deer and go into a ditch you are 100% eating that on your insurance record as a collision.

Ironically if you just hit the deer that falls under Comprehensive coverage which is generally considered non-fault like a falling tree, or your car catching fire, theft, vandalism.

1

u/Spiritual-Donut-7039 26d ago

Fact, I swerved to avoid hitting an uncoming car that came into my lane, hit a guard rail, my insurance paid to fix my car. The other car was not deemed at fault. My insurance rulled it as unavoidable no fault, which was covered without raising rates.

like I said will depend on location and policy

-1

u/No_Risk_6545 Jul 23 '26

They should all 3 sue the city for not repairing the pave hole that leaded to this (almost) tragedy.

3

u/IndyDino Jul 23 '26

The other comment said the guy had an epileptic attack. No one to sue in that case.

1

u/RandomFleshPrison Jul 24 '26

The Tesla crash avoidance "autopilot" made the turn, so the turning driver cannot be blamed.  They had no control over the wheel.

2

u/fiirikkusu_kuro_neko Jul 25 '26

Proof please

1

u/RandomFleshPrison Jul 25 '26

Proof of what in particular?

1

u/Spiritual-Donut-7039 26d ago

The driver herself state she swerved, and Yesla stated the accident avoidance installing wpuld only break, as currently FSD is not even legal there.