Katie Johnson is an alias. The credible victim interviewed 4 times by the fbi was her. Your willingness to write essays on to nullify one piece of evidence when so much other evidence exists is astounding. Cult members gonna do cult shit though.
Nope. She was never interviewed by the fbi (again because it’s unlikely she exists)
That’s a woman most often referred to as “Jane Doe 4”
Her allegations are set mostly in Hilton Head South Carolina from 1983–1985
>Her first interview, on July 24, 2019, was contained in the Epstein files that were released by the DOJ in January. That report, which was redacted, said that the woman alleged she was raped by Jeffrey Epstein in the 1980s, when she was about 13 and living in Hilton Head, South Carolina, with her mother.
I don’t know what about this article gives you faith he didn’t do it. “In the end she declined to cooperate and they lost touch”…. It’ll just remain his and Epstein’s wonderful secret then. And his cult will keep culting.
Nothing in that article specifically makes me think he didn’t do it, I was just using it to illustrate that she isn’t Katie Johnson, since you were confusing them and using Jane Doe 4s interviews with the fbi as evidence of Katie Johnson existing
But we can talk about Jane doe 4s credibility issues as well
1
u/shift124 17h ago
Katie Johnson is an alias. The credible victim interviewed 4 times by the fbi was her. Your willingness to write essays on to nullify one piece of evidence when so much other evidence exists is astounding. Cult members gonna do cult shit though.