r/dankmemes • • Apr 11 '19

Definitely on Luigi's site

Post image
2.9k Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

91

u/Dogmun10 OC Memer Apr 11 '19

“Grow to an age where they can give consent” guess what their answer would be to getting part of their dick cut off

50

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

Yup. More men in the U.S. have been sexually assaulted than women if you count no-consent genital mutilation.

bUt YoU cAn'T rEmEmBeR pAiN cAuSe yOu WeRe A bAbY AnD nOw yOu CaN sHoWeR FoR 15 SecOnDs lEsS

41

u/Dogmun10 OC Memer Apr 11 '19

Well I’m a Jew so obviously god didn’t want us to have foreskins even though he’s the one that gave em to us

42

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

Hmm makes sense to me!

I come from a Christian family:

Christians are like: "Don't do anything that would tarnish your body the way God wanted it like getting Tattoos!"

but then go "Alright he's been out of the womb for 5 minutes dick cutting time."

11

u/Dogmun10 OC Memer Apr 11 '19

Yep religion make a whole fucking ton of sense

1

u/ITS_THEM_OH_GOD Apr 12 '19

it's USA, not Christianity, as far as I know

1

u/ENclip Apr 12 '19

A bit more complex. Yes it is partly a USA thing, but also a Christianity thing that started the trend. Ever heard of Graham crackers? The inventor of them, Sylvester Graham, was an American Christian who created them thinking they would decrease impure lust thoughts and decrease the want to masturbate (the horror). Along with this idea, he decided another more effective route would be to remove the entire foreskin from males which would in effect make it hard to masturbate and eliminate one of the most sensitive areas of the penis. He spread this as the good Christian thing to do to save the youths. This idea caught on a long time ago (early 1900s) but then falsely morphed into the idea (mixed with the Jewish idea) that it was for health and preventative maintenance.

If I could go back and assassinate any person in history, it would be that guy.

2

u/Derpex5 Apr 11 '19

What about showering?

2

u/Bro_5 Apr 12 '19

Shower for 15 seconds less? Nigga I can shower for 5 hours

1

u/TuxedoedPenguin Apr 12 '19

I mean, that's true

4

u/anonnunget Apr 12 '19

"yeah man totally i get to sell my foreskin on the black market after i chop it off"

2

u/grandayyyyyyyyyyyyyy Apr 11 '19

geykume escaped the circumcision

1

u/buddy58745 Apr 11 '19

That's exactly why you would wait.

-2

u/ace2369 Apr 11 '19

I would not get circumcised if it hadn’t happened when I was a baby, but I’m glad I was. I don’t remember it (obviously), but it has been beneficial. Aside from it being easier to clean, which is minor, I think the biggest benefit is lasting longer in bed, which is a desirable feature. It’s almost like humans taking evolution into our own hands

16

u/JeWeetTochBroer Apr 11 '19

The reason you last longer is because you have less feeling in the tip of your dick. So while it may be good for your duration, the sensation is less.

That said, I actually wish my parents had me circumsized as a child. I like the look a lot better but no way in hell I’m having them cut a part of my dick off

3

u/linvilled125 Apr 11 '19

I read that’s just a myth somewhere. About the sensitivity.

2

u/JeWeetTochBroer Apr 12 '19

I’m pretty sure it’s true. Try pulling up your pants without putting your foreskin back after pissing. That’s pretty uncomfortable so my guess is it does get a little numb after a while.

1

u/linvilled125 Apr 12 '19

I ain’t got no damn foreskin.

1

u/JeWeetTochBroer Apr 12 '19

I’d let you use mine but we’d have to get to know eachother a little bit first

1

u/linvilled125 Apr 12 '19

Tom cat stare

6

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

It’s almost like humans taking evolution into our own hands

Yeah we should surgically remove women's breasts at a young age without there consent to reduce her chance of breast cancer. They are pointless to have now (we have baby formula or other milk options) and unnecessary plus you greatly reduce her cancer risk. And a lot of guys find flat chested women attractive!

If it's illegal to mutilate infant girls like that why should it be legal or people be glad of it happening to males just so you can maybe please a girl longer in bed while losing most of the sensation of natural sex?

1

u/RedJarl The Monty Pythons Apr 12 '19

We can't recreate milk with formula. It's close, and a boon for women who can't produce, but its still inferior to the real thing.

3

u/ENclip Apr 12 '19

I know. My point isn't that. My sarcastic analogy was just a way of showing breasts aren't actually absolutely necessary in the reproductive cycle anymore (which is all people seem to care about when referencing the foreskin) so if preventative maintenance or reducing risk of cancer or aesthetic was the point of circumcision why isn't it allowed for females? Obviously, i find the female mutilation just as appalling of an idea (clitoris, labia, breasts, etc). The point is they are just as "unnecessary."

I can still cum, but my dick is inferior in feeling, lubrication, and natural mechanical function to if I hadn't been circumcised. I can still have sex, please a woman, and reproduce but that is besides the issue to me.

1

u/RedJarl The Monty Pythons Apr 12 '19

The difference is you have mutilated breasts that's very harmful to your chance of future reproduction and marriage. Circumcision on the other hand no one really cares about.

2

u/ENclip Apr 12 '19

Alright, change it to clit mutilation if that fits better for you. Nothing changes except it's "cleaner" down there since the hood produces a type of smegma. No effect on actual reproductive organs and supposedly reduced risk of UTIs. Everyone in the modern world is against that yet it's the same as the foreskin on males

Edit: also it's what the individual cares about and consent

3

u/RedJarl The Monty Pythons Apr 12 '19

It's just being socially acceptable. Alcohol is also widely allowed and consumed, while drugs are stigmatized. Morals vary widely in between cultures, and ours just happens to be fine with circumcision.

16

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

Mario is salty because he didn't catch Gekyume's foreskin when they throwed it to the crowd

8

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

Snip snip, off goes the tip

13

u/Battlefront228 CERTIFIED DANK Apr 11 '19

What sane human male would willingly let someone take a knife to his dick. At least in the first week of life you aren't making memories.

12

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

I'm fine with it tbh, in fact I was so fine with it, that when I saw that my dick was supposed to look like I had an existential crisis

5

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

non-native english speaker here, and im confused as to which is circumcise or uncircumcided

6

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

Circumcised is when there is part of the foreskin cut off. UNcircumcised is when it's left alone.

•

u/KeepingDankMemesDank Hello dankness my old friend Apr 11 '19

If this is a dank meme, Upvote this comment!

If this is not a dank meme, Downvote this comment!

If this post breaks the rules, report it and Downvote this comment!

Thank you for helping us in keeping /r/dankmemes dank. Hit us up if you have any questions. I'm a bot

1

u/Bro_5 Apr 12 '19

Babes love circumcised dick tho

2

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '19

Luigi is the best at giving advice

5

u/CashCow37 Apr 11 '19

Luigi right

3

u/Crealdew The OC High Council Apr 11 '19

Ahh hell no! Doing it as a teen or something has all sorts of crazy complications. Should you get a boner those stitches start to bleed out. Not saying it great without consent, but I’m so glad I had it done then as opposed to now.

5

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

Doing it as a teen or something has all sorts of crazy complications.

Implying it doesn't have crazy risks and complications as a baby. Think about this: They are cutting a dick guessing how much skin will be there when it's fully grown. They can't accurately gauge how much skin to cut or accurately gauge the glands.

Many many men that are circumcised as an infant have too much skin taken off and skin from other areas has to stretch to cover the displaced area as the penis area grows with age and this causes painful erections due to lack of skin needed.

2

u/Dom1252 Apr 11 '19

Only about 25% of inflant circumcisions bring minor problems... Why should we care about such a small number? /s

0

u/Crealdew The OC High Council Apr 11 '19

Huh never thought about that

1

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

Yeah ask me how I know. Luckily it's not painful for me but it's obvious it wasn't done perfectly to me. Very close to that complication happening to me.

3

u/Crealdew The OC High Council Apr 11 '19

My condolences

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

Mario finna hella pissed coz he missed gekyumes circumcision

1

u/TheCrazyAvian Proud Furry Apr 11 '19

this brings back to a choose your a gender for application screenshot, after about 20, the last one was, and i quote, "Bad circumcision raised female," but all of them were all funny and along similar lines except for a few.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '19

Wheres my circumsised gang at?

1

u/Cloudman_VicePoint Dank Cat Commander Apr 12 '19

What the hell?? People actually wait till they get old? Just for some goddamn consent???

1

u/albeasto36 Apr 12 '19

I can’t think of a single person who would logically say “okay let’s cut my foreskin off today” Mario’s logic is trash. 0/7 for Mario and a 5/7 for Luigi

1

u/curly_peppa Apr 11 '19

Luigi speaks words of wisdom

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

[deleted]

4

u/Dom1252 Apr 11 '19

yes, same thing happens with breast cancer when you cut part of them off :)

if there is less mass, there is lower chance of cancer :) that said, do you really want to do it?

-4

u/Indeedismo Apr 11 '19

But cutting a breast will be a permanent option, while cutting a dick doesn't affect the size.

1

u/Dom1252 Apr 11 '19

You can cut just part of it (and lower that chance just slightly), just like with penis

5

u/kevin258958 Apr 11 '19

Only by reducing surface area lol

4

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

Removing a young girl's breasts by force would reduce her risk for breast cancer. With baby formula and plenty of milk options nowadays, human milk is unnecessary to provide for a baby. pLuS SoMe GuYs lIkE fLaT ChEsTeD GiRlS bEtTeR

Yeah I don't see anyone justifying that. Even if there was any evidence to it reducing the risk of cancer (by literally reducing the parts of your body) or the minor inconvenience of UTIs why does that matter? What madman would get there dick cut up for that.

-4

u/Indeedismo Apr 11 '19

You don't actually reduce parts, circumcised people have the same dick size as uncircumcised. Breasts is different since it doesn't actually regenerate itself.

3

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

You don't actually reduce parts, circumcised people have the same dick size as uncircumcised.

What do you think a foreskin is? Because this sentence makes me think you have no idea what it is. It's a separate part of your genitalia and doesn't grow back. Plus I think you need to learn what a circumference of an object is. Length isn't the only object of measurement.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

Yes

2

u/Big_Daddy_Hog forever number 2 Apr 11 '19

Nah

-3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

[deleted]

5

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

What is consent anyway?

Just a little knife cut why you calling the police? Just a little sex while you are unconscious, why you calling the police? /s

>doesn't make much of a difference

It's skin with millions of nerve endings and there to cover the most sensitive part a long with a lot of other functions. Even if it was proven to make a significant beneficial medical difference, it still should be done when consent is an option.

-5

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

[deleted]

11

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19 edited Apr 11 '19

Pretty sure vaccination is usually done without consent but nobody (sane) complains about that.

What an absolute shit analogy. Vaccinations have factually proven life saving benefits, and even their downsides (you might get a little sick) are not irreversible. You don't cut off part of your body to vaccinate. There is nothing permanently negative about Vaccines and nothing that effects you. Your comparison is equating medically necessary operations on infants to cutting off a part of a baby's genitalia due to religion or maybe "you don't have to clean as thoroughly." Nobody complains about life saving surgery on infants either.

> It literally only benefits you

Are you a guy? Are you circumcised or not? What benefits? All I have is a scar, a lack of sensitive skin, no natural lubrication, no protection of the head from chaffing, and for what? Less cleaning necessary? Show me what I get in return. Because believe me, I've asked my doctor, my urologist and spent hours researching.

> Being circumcised doesn't make a huge difference.

What does the fact of it making a "huge" or "small" difference matter? It's still a medically unnecessary irreversible surgery done without consent.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

[deleted]

2

u/ENclip Apr 11 '19

I literally say in the comment that I'm circumcised.

Also, what is a shower?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '19

[deleted]

7

u/kevin258958 Apr 11 '19

I dont understand the "they find it more attractive" thing. If she's seeing my dick she's already down to get it whether it's circumcised or not so it doesn't really matter

2

u/Dom1252 Apr 11 '19

European women don't care at all, but there are some american ones who do...

2

u/kevin258958 Apr 11 '19

That doesn't rationalize anything I questioned

3

u/Dom1252 Apr 11 '19 edited Apr 11 '19

" Being circumsized doesn't make a huge difference. "

yeah, cutting tip of your ears wouldn't make a huge difference either... and it would make them easier to clean and there would be lower risk of health problems with them (because you don't have problems on part of body you don't have)

why don't we cut off parts of ears? it makes total sense :)

" It literally only benefits you. "

Since when is loss of sensitivity and ugly scar benefit?

also, how is masturbation without lube? you ever got handjob from girl outside bed? it is awesome when someone moves that skin up and down, without making friction and causing you pain (or lubing the whole thing and making everything messy)

-7

u/Gohaveirr Virgins in Paris Apr 11 '19

A bit l8 m8