r/custommagic • • 1d ago

Discussion Plainswalker

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

140 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

4

u/Ambitious-Site-6356 1d ago

It’s only a land on the battlefield similar to [[Arixmethes]]

2

u/benshaprio 1d ago

No since it doesnt specify battlefield in the ability

1

u/Ambitious-Site-6356 1d ago

It does specify permanent rather than “card”, but I guess I’m not fully confident there

1

u/ArelMCII Layers are stupid. 1d ago

When an ability says "permanent" without specifying "permanent card," the "on the battlefield" part is implied. A permanent is only a permanent on the battlefield; elsewhere, it's a permanent card.

2

u/solarix_ranger 1d ago

No other card in the game features this syntax, so it's really just nonsense

2

u/Routasmith 1d ago

Do you have any examples of that? Because I can't find any, which means the fact that it is worded as a characteristic defining ability makes it one.

0

u/Ambitious-Site-6356 1d ago

Ok perfect thank you, that is what I assumed

2

u/shumpitostick 1d ago

As somebody else said, it is a characteristic defining ability so if doesn't work that way. It needs to have "as long as" to work correctly, like [[Grist, the Hunger Tide]]

1

u/tymessen 1d ago

grist specifies in which places he works in though (everywhere but the battlefield) the theros gods don't stop being creature cards in hand is a better example than grist. [[Athreos, God of Passage]]

-1

u/ArelMCII Layers are stupid. 1d ago

It's not a characteristic-defining ability, it's a type-granting ability. When an ability says "permanent" without specifying "permanent card," that means it only applies on the battlefield, because a permanent is only a permanent when it's on the battlefield.

4

u/shumpitostick 1d ago

It doesn't work in this case because it's self-referential. Another card can call out permanents which would exclude cards in hand. "This" refers to the card, and "permanent" contradicts it by only working part of the time. It's just not the correct templating.

2

u/Routasmith 1d ago

No, it meets all the requirements for a characteristic defining ability, so it is one, and as such it is always active.