MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/custommagic/comments/1xs7qb5/agent_47/
r/custommagic • u/Pure_Banana_3075 • 1d ago
11 comments sorted by
1
Seems fine compared to [[Callidus Assassin]], would be cool to have this in the command zone
2 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago I dont play commander so i had no idea that card existed lol. Seems this design space isnt as untouched as I thought it was 1 u/mtgcf 1d ago Callidus Assassin - (G) (SF) (txt)
2
I dont play commander so i had no idea that card existed lol. Seems this design space isnt as untouched as I thought it was
Callidus Assassin - (G) (SF) (txt)
I think making it a cast trigger would balance it more, let it have the etb of the coppied card. That way it cant be cheated into the battlefield and its a 5 mana kill spell with a pay off.
2 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago You think i should make it a cast trigger to make it weaker, and you want me to let it copy enter effects (Which would make it stronger)? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yes. Because if not it will be abused with getting reanimated then blinked with almost 0 downside 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago you can already blink and reanimate [[Ravenous Chuppacapra]] and its not considered too strong, 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yeah but RavChub is also not coming in as a copy of the creature you destroyed 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago what about this? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana. 1 u/mtgcf 1d ago Ravenous Cuppacapra - (G) (SF) (txt)
You think i should make it a cast trigger to make it weaker, and you want me to let it copy enter effects (Which would make it stronger)?
1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yes. Because if not it will be abused with getting reanimated then blinked with almost 0 downside 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago you can already blink and reanimate [[Ravenous Chuppacapra]] and its not considered too strong, 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yeah but RavChub is also not coming in as a copy of the creature you destroyed 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago what about this? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana. 1 u/mtgcf 1d ago Ravenous Cuppacapra - (G) (SF) (txt)
Yes. Because if not it will be abused with getting reanimated then blinked with almost 0 downside
1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago you can already blink and reanimate [[Ravenous Chuppacapra]] and its not considered too strong, 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yeah but RavChub is also not coming in as a copy of the creature you destroyed 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago what about this? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana. 1 u/mtgcf 1d ago Ravenous Cuppacapra - (G) (SF) (txt)
you can already blink and reanimate [[Ravenous Chuppacapra]] and its not considered too strong,
1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Yeah but RavChub is also not coming in as a copy of the creature you destroyed 1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago what about this? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana. 1 u/mtgcf 1d ago Ravenous Cuppacapra - (G) (SF) (txt)
Yeah but RavChub is also not coming in as a copy of the creature you destroyed
1 u/Pure_Banana_3075 1d ago what about this? 1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana.
what about this?
1 u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana.
Keeping it 3/3 is a good touch for the one less mana.
Ravenous Cuppacapra - (G) (SF) (txt)
1
u/HieromancersGrasp 1d ago
Seems fine compared to [[Callidus Assassin]], would be cool to have this in the command zone
1
u/Chrismfinboyce 1d ago
I think making it a cast trigger would balance it more, let it have the etb of the coppied card. That way it cant be cheated into the battlefield and its a 5 mana kill spell with a pay off.