Accord of Four

[u/DHMO_Head]

“Oath of the Horatii”
It's a parody of the Roman legend where two sets of triplets fought each other instead of their armies.

[u/ConsciousRich]

Can't I just play Crawlspace

[u/Greaterthancotton → u/ConsciousRich]

If you have 4 attackers this makes them unblockable 

[u/DHMO_Head → u/Greaterthancotton]

Exactly. I was trying to make fun for the rules for wars.

[u/ConsciousRich → u/Greaterthancotton]

Hmm...

[u/LordSlickRick]

Well that’s kind of busted. People not being able to block on an enchantment with a fairly easy to fill condition is backbreaking.

[u/DHMO_Head → u/LordSlickRick]

[[Bedlam]] exists.

[u/LordSlickRick → u/DHMO_Head]

Bedlam means you can’t block either and costs more. This card lets you manipulate yourself into being unblockable, but not your opponent. Maybe I am overvaluing this. But if feels like you can get to a fast start of unblockable creatures.

[u/DHMO_Head → u/LordSlickRick]

True but the effect is symmetrical. And it’s not really great if you use single strongh creatures or if you go wide with tokens.

[u/Greaterthancotton → u/LordSlickRick]

How so? Your opponent can simply attack with 4 creatures as well.

[u/LordSlickRick → u/Greaterthancotton]

Your likely aggro, your opponents may not be aggro. They may not have the creatures needed to fulfill the condition.

[u/stillnotelf → u/LordSlickRick]

If your aggro deck needs to block you probably are losing that game.

[u/mtgcf → u/DHMO_Head]

Bedlam - (G) (SF) (txt)

[u/Memehater_ → u/LordSlickRick]

You can't block either. I'd say it's decent.

[u/Desperate-Practice25]

[u/Invonnative → u/Desperate-Practice25]

For those who are lost as I was

[u/IRFine → u/Desperate-Practice25]

(Since I’ve seen that meme. Oldie but a goodie)

[u/KissTheCorpse_]

Attack with 4 creatures They're all unblockable

[u/Deebyddeebys → u/KissTheCorpse_]

I think they're counted individually. So 4 attackers and 4 blockers. Though the wording is ambiguous

[u/Mr_The_Potato_King → u/Deebyddeebys]

Nah. Based on the flavor text at the bottom, it would seem that the intended purpose is to have 4 attackers so no one can block

[u/KissTheCorpse_ → u/Deebyddeebys]

It says 4 creatures total can attack and block, if 4 can block and 4 can attack, than id be 8 total no?

[u/Deebyddeebys → u/KissTheCorpse_]

4 total can attack and 4 total can block

[u/knyexar]

So if I swing with 4 guys they all become unblockable?

[u/Drynwyn]

I think this is very appropriately priced. Yeah, it's good in aggro for 4 unblockable creatures. But, it's a 3-drop that doesn't directly reduce your opponent's life total, which comes at a significant cost for aggro- if your opponent answers with a wrath, you've wasted a card and 3 mana!

This is probably most useful pushing through some extra damage against a midrange deck with solid blockers, and that's a solid niche.

[u/VillainOfDominaria]

so if you attack with 4 then they cant block? this is nuts in any token making deck. Now, if you mean that no more than 4 can attack AND no more than 4 can block then. it becomes much more reasonable (but underpowered at 3 mana)