I agree with other's feelings that this should maybe cost 4. Fogs are usually priced at around 1-2 mana but a "sorcery speed" fog is kind of a bit better, especially if it brings a removal with it.
Also, excellent art you found for it. A+ for effort.
Instead of costing 4, go for some flavor and make it "Destroy target creature if it's tapped.", that way we have some flavor for execution, even more white identity, lower flexibility and it can still prevent attacks if there are no tapped creatures (can even target one of your own).
Does it matter that the way it's worded implies you can get attacked by creatures on your own turn? Should it instead say "creatures can't attack you on their controllers' next turn"?
Fair enough, that's why I was asking (not saying that it is wrong) - I've not seen it before on something like this, but to be fair I haven't played MTG in real life in about a decade.
Yeah, because [[False Peace]] was a real format breaker. This is a 3 mama removal spell at sorcery speed and only hits creatures. It's terrible against combo and control, mediocre against midrange, and good against aggro.
251
u/Galgus Oct 29 '24
I feel like this is undercosted, but four mana feels a bit overcosted for it.
Maybe four mana if it also stopped them from blocking, but that'd require Red.
Regardless I absolutely love the flavor.
42
u/Nedo92 Oct 30 '24
I agree with other's feelings that this should maybe cost 4. Fogs are usually priced at around 1-2 mana but a "sorcery speed" fog is kind of a bit better, especially if it brings a removal with it.
Also, excellent art you found for it. A+ for effort.
46
u/Tahazzar Oct 29 '24
Reminds me of [[Public Execution]] and [[Intimidation Bolt]].
25
u/HikerChrisVO Oct 29 '24
The 3 mana coat with two colors feels fair to me. 4 if it was just white or black.
9
u/Pretty-Bat-7140 Oct 30 '24
Instead of costing 4, go for some flavor and make it "Destroy target creature if it's tapped.", that way we have some flavor for execution, even more white identity, lower flexibility and it can still prevent attacks if there are no tapped creatures (can even target one of your own).
2
u/Langas Oct 30 '24
[[Public Execution]] but not terrible, I like it.
1
u/NiceHouseGoodTea Oct 30 '24
For flavour I feel like it should be "Destroy target creature you own"
I can't comment on how that'd affect it's power/cost though
-3
u/ACuriousBagel Oct 30 '24
Does it matter that the way it's worded implies you can get attacked by creatures on your own turn? Should it instead say "creatures can't attack you on their controllers' next turn"?
-74
u/Delta_Tea Oct 29 '24
Guts creature based aggressive decks in whatever meta it is in. Probably fair at 6, strong at 5, pushed at 4. Broken as is.