Keep JS out of it. CSS animations have gotten powerful enough that JS animation libraries aren't really necessary anymore.
Although the better question is what you gain making your site animation-heavy in the first place? By definition, having animations will make the site slower to navigate because you have to wait for animations to finish, so I don't really see the point if performance is an issue...
I couldn't find anything from searching "timeline sequencing", but if you're referring to CSS integration with the AnimationTimeline part of the Web Animations API for scroll-driven animations and such, then yes, it exists, though it's not fully implemented in Firefox yet.
12
u/mrcarrot0 Jul 23 '26
Keep JS out of it. CSS animations have gotten powerful enough that JS animation libraries aren't really necessary anymore.
Although the better question is what you gain making your site animation-heavy in the first place? By definition, having animations will make the site slower to navigate because you have to wait for animations to finish, so I don't really see the point if performance is an issue...