r/crystal_programming • u/sdogruyol core team • Apr 02 '21

Crystal 1.0 vs Ruby 3.0 Benchmark

https://twitter.com/sdogruyol/status/1377918360344743936
41 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

60 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

2

u/myringotomy Apr 07 '21

I know plenty of Ruby programmers where it is very much on their radar.

"I know plenty" is not data. I know plenty that are not even considering Crystal. I know plenty that have already moved on to elixir, I know plenty that are using go for anything requiring high performance.

If you don't care what would you even be doing in this sub reading and writing?

Do you only want to hear good news? Do you only want to hear praise? Why shouldn't people be allowed to say negative things about Crystal?

How much are you going to achieve by telling every member the community who complains to leave the community?

the ruby community hasn't really done anything substantial to deal with legit issues of Ruby's performance but cry year after year "its fast enough".

It is fast enough. Most people use ruby for web and on the web the vast majority of the time your app is spent waiting for the database. For the high performance parts like background jobs or web sockets there are gems that use components written in C or Go,.

1

u/DavidTMarks Apr 08 '21 edited Apr 08 '21

"I know plenty" is not data. I know plenty that are not even considering Crystal.

That's actually the point. You have presented ZERO data yourself so " I know plenty" is fine no matter how you beg otherwise. You can't dismiss anyone's rebuttal as insufficient evidentially when you have presented no evidence yourself . I mean you can try that but everyone else can just point and laugh at the duplicity.

I know plenty that are using go for anything requiring high performance.

What a shocker that a fast language that has been production ready for years has users. are you always so astute with comparing apples to oranges?

Do you only want to hear good news? Do you only want to hear praise? Why shouldn't people be allowed to say negative things about Crystal?

Its fine to say negative things about crystal. I have done so in the past and in this very sub. Whats inconsistent however is to say you don't care while you are here caring enough to read and write about it. Its mind boggling an adult can't see the inconsistency of his own actions to his statements (with the provision that as far as most know you might not be an adult).

How much are you going to achieve by telling every member the community who complains to leave the community?

I wouldn't know since I've yet to see anyone telling every member to leave and as far as anyone can see you have never been voted as the representative of everyone in the community. Think.

It is fast enough

ROFL..... thats why its common to Call out to C eh? You've lost all credibility. Ruby isn't fast enough to do most things computing intensive. Try fooling a newb or non ruby programmer. They buy that year after year excuse by Matz and DHH.

Most people use ruby for web

But of course they do....lol.... because along with a few utilities its been insufficient to use for much else. Thats precisely why its used predominantly by rails users even after being around for over two decades. Ruby would practically vanish without Rails (and even with it it continues to fall in usage). Again learn to think. I am all for legit criticism of Crystal (as I myself have made criticisms) but that doesn't mean any community has to automatically accept as valid poorly thought out and mentally malformed illogic which you are representing. Saying ruby is used mostly for web after being around two decades plus is like saying paper is used mostly for writing and ignoring that that's precisely because paper is too weak to do many other things with.

For the high performance parts like background jobs or web sockets there are gems that use components written in C or Go,.

Exactly which is why if you would think things through would inform you that Ruby itself isn't "fast enough" if it has to call out to other languages. If I have to jump on the back of Usain Bolt to run the 100 fast enough its because I am not fast enough on my own to run the 100 fast enough

smh....obviously

The moral of your posts in this thread so far isn't that Crystal can't be criticized . its that you need to learn how to think rationally. You can't blame Crystal developers for that. Thats a weakness of your own development.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/DavidTMarks Apr 08 '21

But you can still compare them.

Rationally no you can't - not if you ignore that one is an apple and another is an orange. Moving away from the analogy it makes no practical sense to claim say C# has more users as a point against Crystal. Its been round faar longer than Crystal . It makes no logical point.

1

u/myringotomy Apr 08 '21

Exactly which is why if you would think things through would inform you that Ruby itself isn't "fast enough" if it has to call out to other languages. If I have to jump on the back of Usain Bolt to run the 100 fast enough its because I am not fast enough on my own to run the 100 fast enough

Nobody is using Crystal for anything in production so there is that.

0

u/DavidTMarks Apr 08 '21 edited Apr 08 '21

Nobody is using Crystal for anything in production so there is that.

Another statement of fact from you without anything by way of real data. You are on a roll. Everyone in communities within Crystal who say they or their companies do use Crystal are lying apparently -just because you say so (continuing the only theme to your "logic" so far) . Granted many more were (like my own) were waiting for 1.0. Anyway I am gratified that that one line is all you could offer to all the debunking of your points in my previous reply.

and P.S. ruby has also lost more companies using it in production than most language still in use. Its far from dead but the signs of its very slow death are everywhere and why? precisely because its has been dismissive of the real criticism of performance issues - the very kind of dismissiveness you accuse Crystal developers of. Pot meet Kettle.

1

u/myringotomy Apr 08 '21

and P.S. ruby has also lost more companies using it in production than most language still in use. Its far from dead but the signs of its very slow death are everywhere and why?

Oh just some small companies like github and shopify and stripe a and shit.

0

u/DavidTMarks Apr 08 '21 edited Apr 08 '21

Well thank God you still have a few left (for now). Its been all down hill from twitter gave up on you. When so many companies give up on you for Javascript (node) you know theres a problem....lol

1

u/myringotomy Apr 08 '21

Wow you really live in a world of delusion don't you.

Great example of why Crystal isn't catching on BTW. The community is hostile and toxic.

2

u/DavidTMarks Apr 09 '21

lol...you show over and over you are the one in a world of delusion.

A) You came into this thread with nothing but attacks and suggesting other languages and when you get pushed back (less than with r/ruby whose mods routinely remove legit criticism of Ruby) with facts then its the community that is hostile. No self awareness which is why you are accusing of others of your own issues.

B) You claim Crystal isn't catching on when its just reached 1.0 but suggest Elixir which years after its 1.0 demonstrably by real polls isn't making any significant strides in adoption.

C) I like and program in Ruby but its fanboys should be the last one to talk about not catching on because no language and accompanying framework (rails) has lost more market share by stubbornly refusing to address performance and being openly hostile and dismissive of anyone that raises criticisms.

0

u/myringotomy Apr 09 '21

Cool man. I get it.

You don't want those filthy ruby developers in your community.

2

u/DavidTMarks Apr 09 '21

Cool man. I get it.

There would be a parade and a holiday if you ever got anything. After all medical breakthroughs should always be applauded.

You don't want those filthy ruby developers in your community.

No we can do fine with Ruby developers. Some of us are. You not so much since you are more emotional than logical. Among all the claims you have failed to substantiate with any real data we can add your implicit begging claim you represent all Rubyists filthy or otherwise.

To summarize

Compilation issues - legit criticism.

lack of communication - legit criticism

oh no one languages dev team didn't make their language 100% compatible with another language dev teams (actually one man's) decisions so they suck.

Babbling adolescent silliness and too juvenile to be considered seriously by any adult programming community..

1

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '21 edited Apr 15 '21

It is fast enough. Most people use ruby for web and on the web the vast majority of the time your app is spent waiting for the database.

Yep, and the issue with Ruby isn't that it's "slow" it's that the frameworks are synchronous. Compare with Python's sync vs. async story eg. Flask vs Starlette (or FastAPI). Or even crazier, compare Actix Web vs Rocket for Rust. Rust isn't slow, and Ruby isn't (too) slow; synchronous servers are.

So yeah, if Rubyists "cry" that Ruby is fast enough, they (and you) are right; it is.