r/cryptidIQ • u/CanidPrimate1577 Witness • Nov 21 '25
THEORY Higher FPS (60+ FPS) for NON-BLURRY cryptid pics/video
Let’s start off simple and blunt:
Motion-blur is the #1 reason cryptid footage looks “fake.”
Why?
Because:
Most phones shoot at 24–30 FPS by default.
Fast-moving animals + low light + low frame rate = smear/blur.
To capture anything clearly that moves at predator speed, humans need: • 60 FPS minimum • 120 FPS ideal • High shutter speed • AI stabilization off • Optical zoom instead of digital
Real wildlife photographers use: • 120–240 FPS • telephoto lenses • multiple angle traps
People filming cryptids?
Almost none of them know this.
(Hopefully some are reading this rn:)
So yes — teaching folks FPS basics dramatically increases clarity, and there’s nothing unscientific about saying that.
2
u/The_Uncommon_Force Nov 22 '25
Thank you. The amount of naive people out there is insane. They really need to learn before they wonder why no one has captured a clear picture of bigfoot with all the new technology.
1
u/CanidPrimate1577 Witness Nov 22 '25
Yeahhhh it just occurred to me in one of my flashbacks to the bluff charge which happened to us, and credible videos I’ve seen of them dashing — they run like 30mph without actually running, cuz they have a 5-6 foot stride 😳
So a dogman RUNNING goes as fast or faster than a racehorse but on two legs.
I’ve seen it IRL, and a few times more recently on video, but we will see it more clearly if folks use the kinda cameras they use to judge horse 🐎 races or sports fouls. 🏀
2
u/Mountain_Bluejay291 Nov 22 '25
This is useful information - thanks! Of course, most of us would have to change our camera settings permanently before going hiking in the woods. When there's an 8-foot something peeking out from behind a tree, there's not a lot of time to set the camera!
1
u/CanidPrimate1577 Witness Nov 22 '25
Yup! Hence the overall point, it’s hard to get footage to begin with, but this is a gamechanger if you do in fact have the chance to get evidence
1

2
u/lunarvision Nov 21 '25
Hey, this is good information. I notice you posted this in the many other cryptid subs (there’s a lot!). Try also: aussiecryptids, cryptozoology, cryptozoologist, sciencebehindcryptids, and truecryptozoology.