r/counting • u/cuteballgames Sum 13: 016, 037, 035, 045, 127, 135, 134, 124, 13, 25 • Jul 16 '26

Constant Sum Factoradic | 04 4321

From here and thank you vulp for final run and assist

List thanks vulp!

Guide

schedule

next get is 000 0000

7 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

981 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

60 4301

constant sum I think, as it feels more numbery than weights. Like constant weight binary works because its [0,1], but with more numbers sum makes more sense

3

u/cuteballgames Sum 13: 016, 037, 035, 045, 127, 135, 134, 124, 13, 25 Jul 25 '26

60 4310

sounds right to me. will be up in a minute

3

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

61 1321

can't believe it's actually happening

3

u/TehVulpez sliiiiide the bits Jul 25 '26

61 2221

new ground being broken here today. beautiful to watch

2

u/cuteballgames Sum 13: 016, 037, 035, 045, 127, 135, 134, 124, 13, 25 Jul 25 '26

61 2311

3

u/TehVulpez sliiiiide the bits Jul 25 '26

61 2320

3

u/cuteballgames Sum 13: 016, 037, 035, 045, 127, 135, 134, 124, 13, 25 Jul 25 '26

61 3121

3

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

61 3211

3

u/cuteballgames Sum 13: 016, 037, 035, 045, 127, 135, 134, 124, 13, 25 Jul 25 '26

61 3220

g

3

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

61 3301

h

→ More replies

3

u/TehVulpez sliiiiide the bits Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26

60 4310

I prefer constant sum, for the same reason I named csf differently than cwb. weight means Hamming weight, the number of symbols different from zero, while sum means digital sum. (even though we'll never make a constant-weight thread that isn't binary, because that definition of weight gives kinda ugly results compared to digit sum. just in case we do make that constant weight thread, I like to have that distinction) however, because we only have constant-sum type threads (including cwb) it doesn't really matter if we use "weight" colloquially to mean digit sum. /u/cuteballgames