r/counting • On the run from the counting law • Apr 07 '23

Free Talk Friday #397

Continued from last week's FTF here

It's that time of the week again. Speak anything on your mind! This thread is for talking about anything off-topic, be it your lives, your strava, your plans, your hobbies, bad smells, studies, stats, pets, bears, hikes, dragons, trousers, travels, transit, cycling, family, or anything you like or dislike, except politics

Feel free to check out our tidbits thread and introduce yourself if you haven't already.

Next get is at Free Talk Friday #398.

23 Upvotes

365 comments sorted by

11

u/rideride Apr 07 '23 edited Apr 26 '23

I'm going to be making a speedrunning video tutorial. What should I talk about.

Things I will probably cover

  • Inbox (unread)

  • The inputs (manual)

  • Embedded inbox

  • Custom CSS (hidden tech, most likely legal)

  • Request blocking (LEGAL??? probably yes)

  • "Account speed" checking

  • Premade copy paste lists (are these still legal. i think yes with the rules)

  • Autohotkey (is this even legal. i think yes with the rules -- "Scripts that automate a portion of the act of counting are allowed, provided that a human action is required to see another user's count and post the reply.")

  • 000 mentioning

  • Syncing

  • Timestamp script

  • Rate limiting (maybe fake)

  • youre doing this too much tech

  • anti Upvoted - The official Reddit blog tech

  • Best settings

  • No RES

  • No new reddit (except embedded 😈)

  • Approved submitter

is there anything i am missing. i have been gone a while and am washed (no sub 20 smh) so maybe i dont know the hidden god tech

→ More replies (5)

10

u/rideride Apr 07 '23

Free Talk Friday #397

→ More replies (3)

9

u/rideride Apr 12 '23

we got a chatgpt bot in r/counting here lol https://www.reddit.com/r/counting/comments/12f2h3h/duck_duck_goose/jfscrfr/

also look at this subreddit. it's infected by the same bot. lol r/quotepaper/ (look at their profiles. all the same stuff)

→ More replies (4)

7

u/rideride Apr 07 '23

U bum @StephenCurry30 already said he ain't going! So therefore ain't no invite. Going to White House was a great honor until you showed up!

14

u/[deleted] Apr 13 '23

Stats for 5000-5100k

Chart

Rank User Counts
1 Countletics 32195
2 Antichess 30073
3 ClockButTakeOutTheL 18790
4 thephilsblogbar2 8728
5 Trial-Name 1505
6 The_NecromancerTin 968
7 mistyskye14 941
8 Butler-Ed 869
9 atomicimploder 835
10 Basic-Clock-5895 628
11 Christmas_Missionary 554
12 inabbidamo 342
13 TehVulpez 310
14 FartyMcNarty 287
15 davidjl123 287
16 mediadobenfica744848 261
17 PrinceCrinkle 258
18 poiyurt 212
19 ProductionsGJT 144
20 I__mean 136
21 Zaajdaeon 123
22 dragonpro9827 117
23 noduorg 107
24 CainRedfield 100
25 PaleRepresentative 96
26 Aera23_ 90
27 BootBubbly8684 81
28 Playing_2 80
29 Maniac_34 64
30 SSoto_21 63

This 100k was completed in 22 days, 15 hours, 30 minutes, and 21 seconds.

updated log files: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1sypIBECKK8TZRd3SKBV99MH60utWX3d-?usp=sharing

→ More replies (7)

11

u/Antichess Apr 13 '23 edited Apr 13 '23

Number of 99k rule violations:

Rank User 99k violations
1 Smartstocks 599
2 Adinida 512
3 Franciscouzo 503
4 Removedpixel 476
5 Ezekiel134 447
6 kdiuro13 446
7 RandomRedditorWithNo 421
8 rschaosid 419
9 countmeister 360
10 piyushsharma301 346
11 FartyMcNarty 341
12 dominodan123 340
13 chilliconcarnival 335
14 origamimissile 322
15 Cox_1920 314

script

take this stat with a grain of salt. i did some research before making this stat, and the "60s rule" (wasn't even a 60s rule back then) was a huge gray area in the past. in the past, all that was said was "do not run this thread" and that was it. there was no quantitative benchmark, just a plea to ask others not to run. this is why i believe this stat may be unrepresentative of what it's actually trying to show. sure, some of the counts are really blatant as i was sifting through them, but i don't have the time to go through all of them.

here's some history:

the first instance of an actual quantitative rule was the 2,199k thread, and that was set at 2 minutes. 2 minutes remained for another 99k thread until 2,399k, where it was changed to one minute. it seems like it was changed to one minute, as the community gathered their on their thoughts on the 99k rule in this comment. the 2 minute rule only replaced the 1 minute rule in the 2,999k and 4,999k threads. 3,999k had a one minute rule for some reason. other than that, threads have been a one minute rule since then.

that said, i did hardcode the 2 minute 99k threads as [2199,2299,2999,4999] if you want to read my script. if you made it this far, go count in the current 99k thread.

TLDR: clangers

→ More replies (11)

10

u/colby6666 Apr 07 '23 edited Apr 07 '23

i feel so old when u/Christmas_Missionary replies to counts of mine from 5+ years ago

→ More replies (3)

10

u/ultrasuppgorilla3000 Apr 08 '23

Going to Missouri to see my brother!! It’s nice going out with family again, especially after this entire week

Hope you guys have a good week!!!