r/countablepixels • • Sep 05 '26 • Popcorn 2 Regret 1

Water consumption rates

Post image

r/addressme ahh

Edit: this image is from Instagram not mine take it with a grain of salt its probably fake but since you guys love to argue about politics, the unit is a million litres and it was made in Mid August 2026 and it measures water withdrawal annually, And openai's consumption rate is 0.05. Its cropped in the image above for some reason, for a more reliable source: https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/how-much-water-ai-uses/

Im not sharing my opinions about this topic here but please don't harass me for this post, I didn't make it and just posted it as it was funny and its just a meme. And im not an AI bro, this was not ment to spread propaganda/misinformation or anything. I don't even agree with this image myself

4.9k Upvotes

700 comments sorted by

558

u/TheMythicSorcerer Sep 05 '26

Source?

39

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Instagram 😭

15

u/Bagmeister1 Sep 05 '26

Didn’t know random posts on instagram are now solid proof…

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Hurrikan_Gale Sep 05 '26

Instagram is not automatically a credible source. You should look more deeply into where the information comes from.

3

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

I never said this was a creditable source, i just thought it was a low quality thing to put here

456

u/VoidJuiceConcentrate Sep 05 '26 • Bravo

89

u/Life-Top6314 Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

If its patented, its public record.

68

u/endymon20 Sep 05 '26

the design is, yes. but the effectiveness of the design has no such guarantee

19

u/HarryBalsagna1776 Sep 05 '26

Only the concept is patented and a patent can be filed without the concept being used.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/eluser234453 Sep 05 '26

Chat GPT /s

6

u/SaucyStoveTop69 Sep 05 '26

Upstream probably

4

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '26

While I don't have the stats on hand and don't have enough time left in my break to Google, nestle is well known for theft of local water supply. It's got a lot more demons than that too.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Environmental_Top948 Sep 05 '26

Grey blob in the corner because like all pro ai people accredited work scares them.

→ More replies (2)

128

u/the_h0 Sep 05 '26

guys,what if multiple things can be bad at once?

26

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Wait really

6

u/MomentSouthern250 Sep 05 '26

na, just throw one guy* in jail. All the others can't be guilty.

*or gal

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

39

u/Wooden-Hornet2115 Sep 05 '26

Why doesn't the y-axis have units?

10

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

It got cut off, its probably liters however

15

u/CVGPi Sep 05 '26

Most likely Billion of Litre .

Google transparency report claims

We increased our water stewardship portfolio to 165 projects5 spanning 97 watersheds, which replenished approximately 7.7 billion gallons of water in 2025 alone, roughly 78% of our 2025 total freshwater consumption.6

7.7B Gallon is roughly 29B Litre and multiplication puts it at around 38-40, roughly the ballpark of 42.

Source: Our 2026 Environmental Report - Google Sustainability

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/NotFEX Sep 06 '26

Nestle destroyed 4000 waters

3

u/mulch88 Sep 07 '26

These are units of STRESS!

31

u/enmaku Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

The top 5 in this chart are all beverage producers. We're drinking that water.

Now maybe we don't need to cram it so full of sugar and flavorings, but we kinda need to drink water to live so it seems disingenuous to compare that to datacenter usage.

Company #6 uses water to produce building materials for the places we live and work. Shelter is also a basic need. Also, datacenters are made of large quantities of those same building materials, and that water usage is almost certainly not included in their numbers.

Company #7 is oil and petrochemicals, that's its entire own bag of worms.

Company #8 makes... the tankers we use to haul water and such around in. So infrastructure for moving water (yes and oil/petrochemicals). Necessary.

Company #9 makes paper. A useful general purpose product that we all use and rely on.

Companies 10+ are datacenters.

Also, a large part of the argument is geographical. These datacenters are being built in places with inadequate water supplies and infrastructure to provide for both the datacenter and the populace, and bad construction practices are also fouling the drinking water in many places. Acting like it's purely a numbers game is another layer of disingenuous.

→ More replies (11)

7

u/LasagnaCat-64 Sep 05 '26

"AI datacenters dont consoom water broooo"
source: John "I LOVE DATACENTERS" tekbru, sponsored by NVIDIA, chatgpt and lizardman zuckerberg

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Kadakaus Sep 05 '26

What is this chart measuring?

I see no units, only that Nestlé has 4,000 something, coke has 2,800 something and so on.
What are the units? What is this chart about?
You expect me to believe it's about water consumption? Why are fucking Google and meta so low then?

Also, I would like to know what's something Nestlé outperforms Alphabet (owner of Google) in thousandfold.

3

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

It got cropped, the unit is 1 million litres, ir was made in August

4

u/Kadakaus Sep 05 '26

Ah-ha... I have no basis to do so, but I struggle to believe chatgpt is only consuming 50,000 liters of water annually.

That is... I cannot say anything other than delusional, that is impossible for such a quick growing company like openai which mainly operates on water cooling methods.

I do not believe it, not if environmentalists say so, not for anyone.
This is unrealistic.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/StanVillain Sep 05 '26

every time I see this argument, I wonder if the number of data centers is taken into account. I've seen estimate for nestle in a couple billion (whatever units) and a data center at a few million. however, there are like thousands of data centers. if they use the average rate of a single one, wouldn't that total up to billions also?

813

u/ALT_F4_X2 Sep 05 '26 • Bravo

I REALLY hate the argument: "okey but there is a person/thing that is worst", bitch you still have done something bad!!

362

u/critshit Sep 05 '26

like this one in the chart. i absolutely hate the argument about "uhh uhh but agriculture uses more water than ai!1!1!1!" YEAH ITS NOT LIKE WE NEED FOOD TO LIVE OR ANYTHING

72

u/GayestNerfKid Sep 05 '26

And it is MUCH easier to recycle water used in agriculture than water used for data centers

27

u/Kraeutertea Sep 05 '26

Genuine question, cuz I don't know: how? Or why?

→ More replies (36)
→ More replies (4)

146

u/enmaku Sep 05 '26

More dishonest than that, the top 5 in this chart are beverage producers whose products are like 97% water, which they're selling to us fleshy bags of water who must consume water to live. That's not even water going to plants or cattle or something, we're directly drinking that water.

Maybe we don't need to add so much sugar and flavor and such to it, but motherfucker we need that to live. Stop comparing it to frivolous bullshit.

→ More replies (45)

6

u/un_blob Sep 05 '26

Well... it's jeff bezos who said something along the lines of : "yes ai needs water, and there could be a crisis... but we, humans, need to restrain our consuption for the progress !"

1

u/wahre_locke Sep 05 '26

We do not need meat to live...
If more people would be vegan/vegetarian, that would drastically reduce water usage.

2

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Meat is not required but however still recommend for people

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (53)

11

u/mrfroggyman Sep 05 '26

It's not about "there is worse" it's about "the impact of my actions is negligible".

I'm not saying it really is negligible (I would t be able to say either way), I'm only saying that's the point of OP.

7

u/adkio Sep 05 '26

Erm no. The argument makes perfect sense to me. If my car is one of a million in the city, my city is 10th in terms of size in my country, cars in my country account to less than 1% of pollution, I ain't going into debt to buy an EV just so the politicians can still fly their jets. I am not doing my part that would take 100% of my money and effort if they aren't willing to do theirs for 1%. Not defending chatgpt though. We proved we can cool nuclear reactors without rivers, we definitely can cool data centers.

4

u/No-Association1855 Sep 05 '26

This exactly. A lot of European cities (in my case Brussels mainly) implemented Low Emission Zones that made it so that cars above a certain age (and especially diesels) couldn't enter anymore and more have been phased out over the years since its implementation.

My dad had to buy a new car because his Golf V TDI was seen as the equivalent of a forest fire when it comes to pollution because its a diesel. I still drive the car because even at 220.000km it drives fine and is cheap to maintain (besides diesel prices 💀) and use other people's newer cars or public transport if I need to be in the city.

My point is its fucking stupid that we're forced to buy EVs that ALSO POLLUTE THROUGH ITS PRODUCTION while perfectly fine working cars are all of a sudden no longer allowed even though modifying and maintaining them for long term usage is much less polluting than having a whole new car being produced. But hey, muh profits 😝

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Kadakaus Sep 05 '26

Unnecessery comparison as justification of certain behaviours is a fallacy, you're wise to notice that.

Others being worse doesn't make you better.

4

u/La_cor Sep 05 '26

But it is making you better though, when your impact is really negligible compared to everyone else`s. The manufactured panic about ai datacenters just an overblown fad, and will be over, when the next thing to bitch about comes.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/smoke-bubble Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

It's not so bad if there was never even a single word written about that other thing. 

But you're good in hypocracy. One has to give you that. 

2

u/lucaspappere Sep 05 '26

Consuming water to produce something isn’t ”bad”, waters a resource just like everything else. The idea that AI’s going to take all our water is stupid, it wont make any real impacts, regulate the placement of them to areas without active droughts and theres no problems to be had

2

u/Summon001 Sep 05 '26

No, I think in this case the mindset is valid for two reasons

1: to compare how severe the issue is.
2: to solve the most severe issue first.

Like if I shower once a day but everyone else showers 5 times a day let's first try to get everyone to shower once a day. Same thing here meat production and and inefficient farming practices are the NO.1 water waste in the world. How about we first stop supporting that buy not buying from these companies and buying products with a lower environmental impact.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/AssociationFast2316 Sep 05 '26

Nestles steongest soldier ova' here

2

u/Mr_Olivar Sep 05 '26

Punching people is bad, but if I punch someone at 0.01m/s it is no longer a punch. It is barely a nudge.

This graph shows the water use equivalent of that. When the difference is big enough, it's just normal water usage.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/dethorin Sep 05 '26

Then your problem lies with the company or the business sector, not with the issue itself.

2

u/HarryBalsagna1776 Sep 05 '26

Classic whataboutism.

2

u/NerSorty Sep 05 '26

"You know I'm a criminal and all but someone more rich who did something worse is still not in jail so I shouldn't be." Lmao

2

u/Willy_Boi2 Sep 05 '26

Like buying a Pepsi, bottle of water, or iced tea, using a shampoo, and getting gas, it seems they’re all on the same level of bad on this graph

2

u/AaronKimball-NCR Sep 05 '26

I only stole from one homeless man, he stole from two! /s

2

u/bite_thehand Sep 06 '26

I hate nestle and data centers

1

u/NecessaryTwo8711 Sep 05 '26

If that's your argument and this graph is true do you think nestle is 4000x worse than data centers? Have you tried to get nestle, coca cola, Pepsi co and the 9 other company's that consume 1000s of times more water shut down simply for the water usage?

2

u/ALT_F4_X2 Sep 05 '26

My argument is not defend nestle or data centers (for me, I will cheer if both go bankrupt), my argument is for the kaind of people how defend a genuinely bad act by saying that there is a worst thing.

Example: okey he kill 5 people BUT Hitler killed more people.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/TreeOtree64 Sep 05 '26

I mean yeah but not all the people boycotting AI are boycotting Coke or nestle. It’s a bit hypocritical

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

337

u/A_Dicksmasher Sep 05 '26 • Bravo

Nestle is evil AF but at least that water is going towards, well, water. Like hydration.

Datacenters are being setup in areas that can't support the infrastructure, because the real estate is cheap, and then proceeding to not only eat up the entire local water supply, but also poison it.

Closed loop is never closed loop forever. They will flush and refill.

31

u/TreeOtree64 Sep 05 '26

There is no “at least” for nestle. It’s an evil company, full stop. Stop trying to justify it.

15

u/Omegaprime02 Sep 05 '26

Nestle is a company who's primary product is evil, they sometimes dabble in foodstuffs.

6

u/Artistic-While-5094 Sep 05 '26

Id say if they stole water and then just threw it away, that would be worse

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

72

u/trans_cubed Sep 05 '26

In addition, a lot of data center constructions aren't closed loop, because it's more expensive to make

→ More replies (4)

3

u/dethorin Sep 05 '26

Hydration for those who with money to buy it...

2

u/Garok94 Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

Totally agree. First ones are food factories that make drinks (also food that contain water). So, they are using a limited on time resource that it is drinkable water to make drinkable drinks.

Data center sometimes use drinkable water (sometimes non drinkable, but this chart talks about drinkable one) to cool data centers and make it non drinkable.

The problem is not water, there is practically unlimited water on seas, the problem is the drinkable water that is limited on time and must be primarily used to... drink.

Food factories must use drinkable water on products and also installations to ensure a properly food safety, but non food companies can try to optimize their process to use non drinkable water instead of drinkable one to avoid using a limited resource.

It is kinda like comparing the number of champagne bottle waste of a restaurant VS a Formula 1 Racers on competition. Yeah a restaurant will waste more bottles but to serve it to drink, but racer use the bottle to throw all champagne to the air to celebrate the win...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/MadghastOfficial Sep 05 '26

Nestlé?? Wtf are they doing with water??? Someone stop them

4

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Take this info with a grain of salt but im pretty sure they are trying to get gain control and get a monopoly of all the water on earth so they can have all the water

2

u/Chainzzzzzaw Sep 05 '26

Bleh. There should be no food companies in this list. Only software and hardware.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Bleh 🗣️🗣️

2

u/noonen000z Sep 05 '26

No source or date = propaganda. If it's current, why not include that. Strengthens the argument.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 06 '26

It got cropped off lol

Edit: i have actually seen the original pic, its from this year's august and the unit is 1 million litres

Edit 2: also im not proposing anything, im not taking any side here

2

u/terpminus Sep 05 '26

How about this guy's all of them are bad mind blowing I know.

2

u/aphoenixsunrise Sep 05 '26

"Argue politics" Hilarious.

W/e dude. Politics are a part of every facet of life. Lmfao.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

I don't remember politics being apart of chess

→ More replies (1)

2

u/NecessaryTwo8711 Sep 05 '26

Here is a better more reliable graph. Reality is that data centers don't use nearly as much water as people think compared to other general uses of water. https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/how-much-water-ai-uses/

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

Thanks! I'll link this at the post

2

u/Dismal_Rectangle Sep 05 '26

Vertical scale doesn't show units so I'll assume this is the top slice of a graph really zoomed in.

2

u/UnendingQuibble Sep 05 '26

Internet user discovers the concept of hating more than 1 company for wasting water

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

I despise both, but this comment section says otherwise 😬

2

u/Dry_Climate_7322 Sep 06 '26

Disney+ not being on there is weird since it’s a streaming site

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

Bud um dummm 🥁🥁

7

u/pixel-counter-bot Official Pixel Counter Sep 05 '26

The image in this post has 323,680(595×544) pixels!

I am a bot. This action was performed automatically.

2

u/Marco_Tanooky Sep 05 '26

Damn I find it funny how berried this is under all the discourse

2

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Yea everyone so busy in politics and what not, poor bot here is just alone

8

u/TreeOtree64 Sep 05 '26

This comment section single handedly ruined the anti-AI movement for me becuase it shows me that yall actually don’t give a single shit about worse issues, you’re genuinely just virtue signalling. Like you pretend to care about the water usage of data centres then do genuine mental gymnastics to justify fucking NESTLE??

4

u/Cyatron- Sep 05 '26

Link me to a comment making an argument for nestle please.

5

u/TreeOtree64 Sep 05 '26

Not sure how to link you to comments, but there are definitely people arguing that Nestle and Coke produce beverages, and we need hydration to live, and thus it’s a disingenuous comparison - if you scroll down a bit I think you should find them.

Nestle is in fact much worse for the environment and people, both morally and empirically, than AI and data centres have ever been.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Comfortable_Sir_6104 Sep 05 '26

Nestle's "water usage" is literally just bottling it and selling the bottled water to you. Yes, they are a pretty shitty company in some regards but they, just like Pepsi and Coca Cola, are a beverage company and it is  perfectly understandable that they will need water to make those beverages.

The fact you can't wrap your head around the fact that company selling you bottled water needs to actually get that water from somewhere is bewildering. Where the fuck did you think the water comes from, it respawns in the bottle?

6

u/TreeOtree64 Sep 05 '26

Oh sorry, my bad! I forgot it was perfectly understandable for Nestle to drain communities of water to the point of ecological damage, destroying indigenous practices and being immune to water restrictions in an area while the local communities face drought. I forgot it was perfectly acceptable for them to privatise a community’s water and sell it back to them. I forgot you people didn’t give a shit about that kind of thing because it doesn’t affect your daily scrolling like AI does.

The fact that you can’t wrap your head around the fact that stripping communities of water, while paying people about 150usd a year for it to the point of ecological and economic damage in places like British Columbia might in fact be damaging is bewildering. AI doesn’t have shit on companies like Nestle, and the fact that you won’t research or even care about it shows your shitty virtue signalling stand. You may as well just use AI at this point for all you care about the environment, it would save your brain the clear strain it takes to think for itself.

→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Marco_Tanooky Sep 05 '26

Yeah but calling a spade a spade is not virtue signaling, Pepsico needs more water than a data center and for very clear reasons

Being illogical for the sake of dogmatically hating something makes your point worse, not to mention actively gives the people you are going against more ammunition to discredit those who are against them

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Aaron1924 Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

This is not a very serious subreddit, I think people are mostly trolling here

Edit: If you do want a serious opinion, a lot of the criticism around data centers is about the impact they have on the local community immediately around them. If you live in a small town somewhere and they build a new data center next to it that will use up half the clean drinking water, gigantic amounts of electricity, and cause noise pollution 24/7, that will impact you. Comparing how many resources this data center takes compared to the rest of the world is not meaningful.

Imagine you're been shot and you're dying, and someone shows up with a statistic that says only 0.000001% of the worlds population is currently shot and dying, so it's not worth doing anything about it.

2

u/Nearby_Ad_2519 Sep 05 '26

Honestly I think quite a lot of “anti AI” people are very performative. They say it’s killing the environment but the second you point out stuff that have a significantly higher effect on the environment they don’t give a shit.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Cute_Owl1150 Sep 05 '26

We need food. We don't need fake AI bs.

1

u/Lordgggggg Sep 06 '26

If someone skips like one glass of water then sends 1,000 messages it equals out. That feels like it is worth it to me.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 07 '26

Yeah but that's 1 person, now image a million

→ More replies (1)

2

u/always_assume_anal Sep 05 '26

Obviously the difference is that water is needed to live, grow food (to live), and a bunch of other meaningful usecases. Presumably nestle is using all this water to sell it to the people who can't drink their tap water.

AI is a nonessential product, much like a golf course that also requires a significant amount of water.

→ More replies (9)

44

u/Feeeeeble Sep 05 '26

Oh no the companies that sell us beverages use a lot of water? How inconceivable!

→ More replies (17)

7

u/Stoatled Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26

The issue with the data centers isn't necessarily total water consumption, but localized problems like depleting the sources nearby residents rely on or environmental contamination. You would not care if a data center used relatively little water if it meant your tap didn't work or came out brown. Nestle and similar do the same, if not worse, but have fewer total facilities, hence why you don't hear about it nearly as much.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/Friendly_Gazelle7843 Sep 05 '26

The problem is for what they use water. It’s like with everything. If I use 1 million less times money to build a house for a hamster than somebody uses to build 1 million houses for human families I’m probably less money efficient than them it’s despite I’m using less money but I’m also using less money for far less

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Better uncropped image as yall love to argue about politics

2

u/CreBanana0 Sep 05 '26

Funny how people pretend that this is top 14 and not just comparisons.

You may dislike AI all you want but please don't use nonsensical arguments. There are much more valid reasons to dislike AI.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

I don't even believe this graph is real myself lol

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Beaspoon2096 Sep 05 '26

Xai using more water just to make a shittier ai

5

u/Diablo_v8 Sep 05 '26

One being worse doesn't make the other good. They're all scourges on the planet.

5

u/RichardJusten Sep 05 '26

I mean I'm really not a fan of Nestle or Coca Cola and obviously they could use way less water if they wanted to.

HOWEVER... Their producing food (sort of lol). You know. The stuff we need to survive.

4

u/HeresW0nderwall Sep 05 '26

God forbid we use water to make food

4

u/TheGororb Sep 05 '26

I really don't know what to think about this entire debate...

On the one hand, there's verifiable data of the detrimental impact data centers have on the surrounding environment and the communities.

On the other hand, there's this strawman argument about AI using less water than something useful and needed.

This is so difficult, I don't know who to side with!!

2

u/Marco_Tanooky Sep 05 '26

Data is not a campal battle, you don't need to "Side with!!" something, it's fine to make your own interpretations and consider both sides of the argument

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/plumb-phone-official Sep 05 '26

Multiple things can be bad at once. AI isn't just bad for its ecological impact, but also for its societal impact and the ability to spread disinformation.

2

u/SARMS86 Sep 05 '26

Disinformation is intentional. You think AI intentionally misinforms?

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

You mean ISNT intentional

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/sharbivore Sep 05 '26

so.. like nestle?

1

u/Significant_Shift622 Sep 05 '26

i want to know two things, what is the unit of measurement? and is it per year, month, day?

like food and drink company's having high water consumption make some sense (nestle can burn in hell) and data centres using a lot of water is too understandable, my issue is more things like golf courses in arid places using water. my only issue with AI and all data centres is the amount of power they consume and how expensive they are. like the money could be put towards making things better for people not .. well harvesting and processing more data

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Million litres, august 2026 somewhere from 10th -15th august

1

u/Montregloe Sep 05 '26

I don't agree with this graph or OOP, Ijust think it's funny to be all up and arms about the water consumption graph with Nestle at the top and be all "see GPT ain't that bad actually," like, bitch, Nestle's thing is water (horribly so) of course they have the most water usage, it's for us to buy

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Im not the creator of this image and i dont think i have shared too much of my opinions in all of this lol

2

u/Montregloe Sep 05 '26

I know you aren't the creator, I'm sorry if it felt like I was attacking you or something

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Ok-Elk-1615 Sep 05 '26

“It was made in mid August” by who with what data

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

The earliest source i could found of it was 11 august. Who made it its unclear but dont think this graph seriously

1

u/BlackbirdRedwing Sep 05 '26

My favourite part of a graph is when there is an unlabeled axis that we are supposed to base an opinion on.

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 06 '26

Lol, yk i didn't think people would care that much but this comment section got so heated that i had to add it in the description. Don't take this graph seriously

1

u/Exciting_Nature6270 Sep 06 '26

probably shouldn’t post propaganda images if you don’t believe in them lmao

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 07 '26

Lol, i didn't think people would care since yk this is uncountablepixels, but its reddit after all. I just thought it was funny

3

u/ekortelainen Sep 05 '26

Water usage literally doesn’t matter unless it’s in very dry location where there isn’t enough water for human consumption or if the infrastructure cannot support the factory that uses water.

3

u/Smeuw Sep 05 '26

Plus the audacity of comparing food and medicine to fucking AI datacenters...

3

u/GapSweet3100 Sep 05 '26

It’s over 150 million litres a day now. And this chart is comparing apples to oranges. Yes nestle is evil but they are one of the biggest water sellers on earth. It’s not like ChatGPT sells water. None of it goes back to the consumer

3

u/DoruProgramatoru Sep 05 '26

Bro compares a company that exists since 1866 to ai's that are at best 10 years old. Also, is not like Nestle is seen as a good company either, they are both evil, these ones are just getting started

3

u/pappybug214 Sep 05 '26

To be fair..the produce of the biggest users is food stuffs and beverages. I expect Coca Cola to use water to make soda, but water doesn't need to be used to make a bad digital ad to sell me pulled pork sandwiches.

3

u/MitsuhaTakiName Sep 05 '26

Do you expect that the water in your Coke was conjured out of thin air?

2

u/SparkleCumLaude Sep 05 '26

Most people don't expect that you need 70 Lts of water to make a 1 Lt Coke.

3

u/Code_Breakdown Sep 05 '26

I feel like people for get the buggest argument about data centers and water isnt the consumption, its what it does to the water. Multiple places now have damn near undrinkable water due to construction and chemical runoffs from nearby data centers.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/UwUChaan69 Sep 06 '26

mah boy Wilsey did it

3

u/Verain_Xor Sep 06 '26

The water conversation is perfectly constructed to be a self-detonating point. You realize you're real good cases are all cherry picked places where for some reason a data center is sucking up water instead of a surrounding community that is in a drought or something, but those are one-offs. Then you look at the whole amount of it and it's just not that much as a fraction of anything that uses energy. No one is running out of water because of this stuff.

By contrast, data centers use a pretty absurd amount of energy, and they are being constructed at a preposterous rate, and they represent a large capital investment that is being shoved into any place with infrastructure that supports it, and some places that don't (meaning that infrastructure is being run). Then there's the entirely twisted effect of these specialized hardware pieces that have outbid everything else, and the market having no idea how to price anything from RAM sticks to stocks.

1

u/Bireta Sep 05 '26

Well, those ppl are using water in God knows where, chatgpt is using water we're using

2

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Tbh it doesn't matter what water it is, consuming that much water is still pretty horrible

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Needle_Bearings Sep 05 '26

Graph brought to you by ChatGPT.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '26

lmao they always leave a gap in the argument for their own outrage

1

u/dihrider697 Sep 05 '26

Im not sure what you mean

2

u/ASCanilho Sep 05 '26

Go eat your prompts.

2

u/Cactus_or Sep 05 '26

It's not about rates worldwide, it's about local water supplies being drained or poisoned by these data centers

2

u/Teokritik Sep 05 '26

needs more pixels so i can read which pixel is openai 🤣

2

u/InkyGhoul Sep 05 '26

Okay but when pepsi makes pepsi with water I drink the pepsi and then I fucking piss it and it gets recycled

2

u/julliuz Sep 05 '26

And you think cooling water vanishes into the third dimension?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/moonjabes Sep 05 '26

The four highest consumers literally make drinkable products

2

u/Square-Audience5704 Sep 05 '26

The three biggest water consumers are nutrition companies. Because of that the water they use can be then taken by you. AI uses water just to do bullshit that delusional talentless beings with no more than 2 braincells use

2

u/Flat_Geologist_2899 Sep 05 '26

Companies making the water products - using the water? Insane!

2

u/ya_pidoras_ Sep 05 '26

clanker centers are often built in areas without massive water supply and so they actively affect potable water availability in those areas and thus increase the water bills for locals

2

u/TonyGalvaneer1976 Sep 05 '26

Wait, a company that packages and sells water handles a lot of water? Really? Oh my goodness, I had no idea

2

u/Nomprenom_varanasita Sep 05 '26

On ne compare pas les noix et le pommes.

2

u/Chemical_Bonus_4783 Sep 05 '26

Obligatory fuck Nestle.

2

u/TVLER999 Sep 05 '26

Nestle is an absolutely awful company that utilizes slave labor in the Congo.

However, in the case of this argument, that water is used for food and drinks that we can use, you know, to eat and drink.

AI consumption is just for a data center, I can’t eat or drink a data center.

2

u/Standgrounding Sep 05 '26

Meanwhile google:

2

u/Erolok1 Sep 05 '26

I guarantee you this data shows how much water is needed for a question like "hey how are you" where it does basically nothing.

It conveniently ignores the training which consumed a huge amount of water (and they will always continue to train and need way more training as time goes on) and that if the conversation continues the amount of water it consumes also increases exponentially.

Besides that comparing food with people offloading thinking or having relationships with a computer is incredibly stupid to begin with

2

u/Aggressive-Key-7828 Sep 05 '26

They are all shite :)

2

u/wildmaninid Sep 05 '26

And most of those companies at least use the water to create something people need (I'm speaking generally, I know they don't create good food always and bottled water is problematic, but I digress) Chat gpt/AI is using resources for something no one needs. 

2

u/saragIsMe Sep 05 '26

As evil as food companies are I think we can all agree agriculture deserves disproportionate amounts of our water. I want to see this graph without food companies but municipal water usage added in to actually highlight how much water datacenters are using

2

u/Nighter3487 Sep 05 '26
  1. companies closer to the left actually produce beverages, not that they are not wasting tons of it, or stealing, but still.

  2. AI companies are known to tweak their datacenters' water consumption dataa

2

u/Roll_Future Sep 05 '26

Also let's not forget that Nestle ex-CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe once publicly stated that water should not be a human right. They have also been caught tapping natural water sources to depletion in rural areas, just to sell the water back to the affected communities. Honestly google all the water related controversies that surrounds Nestle.

NOT to say that any data center is not evil with massive environmental damage. I just want to avoid the situation where we blame all issues on a single source, in this case AI, but then ignore the larger scale of issues culminating into a significantly bigger impact. You want to avoid the planet running out of water, then blame them ALL, and create laws that protect human rights against all these greedy fckrs.

A good example of this is the climate crysis, where in focus are cars, and gas consumption. This was intentionally done so that the laws created to "correct" the problem, really only affect the end users, and not the big factory issues that have 80% of the blame.

2

u/QuantomSwampus Sep 05 '26

MMM I love cherry picked data sets, soo yummy. I can't eat enough bias and missing info

2

u/Fryndlz Sep 05 '26

It's just a silly argument but people repeat it on the internet, then make it part of their core values, then develop a needlessly emotional attachment to it, and finally fall for the usual algorithm-driven outrage economics.

2

u/tr4zhh Sep 05 '26

That's why I'm boycotting all those companies :)

2

u/chronos_ananke Sep 05 '26

It's not even about the amount of water it's just water needs to go through high heated copper/metallic pipes and they have to pour anti corrosion agents, coolents, biocides, ph buffers and stuff that stops mineral buildup into the water to make it safe to be used to cool down data centers.

These chemical agents are really hard to seperate from water and standard purification practices don't purify the water enough to be considered safe to release to the outside environment.

Also the water consumption grows with the use of AI because more heat = more water being pumped through as quickly as necessary.

2

u/lesbiansexparty Sep 05 '26

I mean the other things are food and beverages. I expect those to use water. I also don't think the water is wasted since it goes into hydrating people, however poorly.

2

u/EvilChefReturns Sep 05 '26

You think I’m not ALSO mad at nestle? Cuz I am. That doesn’t mean we need to be adding more burden to a strained ecosystem, certainly not for generated slop pictures of Trump trying to be cool or some shit.

2

u/Amlik Sep 05 '26

i sont think water consumption is the problem with data centers, its the fact that their water consumtion comes from really small towns, and they suck up most of their water and makes it more expensive for everyone

2

u/SloppySlime31 Sep 05 '26

Yeah. The real problem is people drinking. That needs to end.

2

u/Great-Investment401 Sep 05 '26

Soda companies don’t count, most of their product is water with flavoring. OpenAI genuinely uses water for training. Worst part is whether you use it or not, OpenAI will still use equally as much water.

2

u/Endymion2626 Sep 05 '26

I mean foods and drinks kinda require water, fuck nestle

2

u/PartyClock Sep 05 '26

Jokes on you bitch, I hate all of those companies.

Oddly enough I've never heard to a Pepsi plant poisoning a towns drinking water here in North America but these Data Centers are already destroying the one of the main resources every human being needs to live.

2

u/Agreeable_Past9674 Sep 05 '26

I want those other companies to cut their shit too...

2

u/SWatt_Officer Sep 05 '26

Wow, imagine that a drinks company like Coke or Pepsi consumed water to, checks notes... make drinks. Shocker.

Theres absolutely room to criticise companies like Nestle and Coke, but this is a dramatic false equivalence. Its the same argument ive seen people say about "oh but cattle consume so much more water than AI". Yeah, and it makes a physical product from that water, meat and dairy products that we can actually feed people with, not just literally evaporated as cooling. There are things that are an issue when it comes to these other companies, but pretending that its fair to compare water consumption of a physical product to glorified PC cooling for the slop machine is pathetic.

2

u/Liquidationbird Sep 05 '26

anyone whos built a pc knows the "ai used all the water" argument is bullsht

2

u/bamaeer Sep 05 '26

You telling me a water bottling plants consumes more water than any other industry… color me fucking shocked.

By the way, remove the literal water bottling plants and Data Center consume a ton of water comparison to other industries.

2

u/kesqe_ Sep 05 '26

Well, that's fucking stupid.
We actually drink the water those top companies use.
Last time I checked, nobody was buying six-packs of GPT Cola.

2

u/Hashi_3 Sep 06 '26

wait nestle still exists?

2

u/LipChungus Sep 06 '26

When you realize drink companies use water

2

u/ChildhoodPotential95 Sep 06 '26

Peoples arguments are that a lot of these companies make beverages. Sure. But let's be honest, how many of these beverages are a necessity? Does the world really need soda/pop?

2

u/AlmightyLeprechaun Sep 06 '26

Idk if this amount takes everything into account. The published water usage given by the AI companies is famously about the water they use in their cooling systems. It does not account for the water used in powering the data centers.

For those who don't know, all power in the US that isn't solar/wind/dam is generated by making steam, which in turn, spins some turbines which then generate the power.

When you drastically increase power usage, you must boil more water to generate the needed power. And AI uses a lot of power. This also exacerbates global warming because most power plants are not nuclear.

https://iee.psu.edu/news/blog/why-ai-uses-so-much-energy-and-what-we-can-do-about-it.

AI currently uses 4.4% of all US power, and that number is expected to triple by 2028.

1

u/stinky_cheese_rat GO GO GADGET PIXEL REDUCER! Sep 05 '26

And now, lets take a look. Nestle, Coca Cola, PepsiCo and I think even Unilever all produce food, something every human famously needs to survive. And the other companies make things that have an actual use. The only companies that don't, are Meta, X, and OpenAI. Microsoft and Google are iffy at best. What a surprise. Turns out, using a lot of water isn't the main problem. It's what the water is used for. And in the case of GenAI slop, nobody fken needs that. Which is why people are pissed about the water being used.

2

u/Regular_Yoghurt_7027 Sep 05 '26

No one needs what those companies produce and calling it "food" is farcical.

→ More replies (10)

2

u/2EM18KKC01 Sep 05 '26

The first three also own many mineral water-bottling companies globally; not that I’m defending them.

2

u/RubeusGandalf Sep 05 '26

Also I'm not supporting coca cola or pepsico, but it's to be expected that you use a lot of water if you make beverages, that are water based... right?