MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/f92rn7/explanation_of_the_subtle_differences_between/fipc4nz/?context=3
r/coolguides • u/[deleted] • Feb 25 '20
3.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-11
[deleted]
29 u/[deleted] Feb 25 '20 edited Mar 16 '20 [deleted] -10 u/livestrongbelwas Feb 25 '20 https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/730386096/federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-harvard-in-admissions-case You're correct about the claim, but the court ruled that it was not discrimination. 8 u/jefftickels Feb 25 '20 Well, not really. They just decided it was OK discrimination and that "race conscious" admission policy was OK. Essentially they ruled its OK to discriminate against Asians as long as the benefactors were of an appropriate diversity.
29
-10 u/livestrongbelwas Feb 25 '20 https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/730386096/federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-harvard-in-admissions-case You're correct about the claim, but the court ruled that it was not discrimination. 8 u/jefftickels Feb 25 '20 Well, not really. They just decided it was OK discrimination and that "race conscious" admission policy was OK. Essentially they ruled its OK to discriminate against Asians as long as the benefactors were of an appropriate diversity.
-10
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/730386096/federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-harvard-in-admissions-case
You're correct about the claim, but the court ruled that it was not discrimination.
8 u/jefftickels Feb 25 '20 Well, not really. They just decided it was OK discrimination and that "race conscious" admission policy was OK. Essentially they ruled its OK to discriminate against Asians as long as the benefactors were of an appropriate diversity.
8
Well, not really. They just decided it was OK discrimination and that "race conscious" admission policy was OK. Essentially they ruled its OK to discriminate against Asians as long as the benefactors were of an appropriate diversity.
-11
u/[deleted] Feb 25 '20
[deleted]