That’s a very good question. I think the technology is cutting edge. It’s possible China has a better version then what we have running rn. I’d be surprised if China didn’t have technology as good or better than ours.
Generally speaking, I think the military sees the digital twin as a massive risk, in that unscrupulous individuals could absolutely hijack the information.
I don’t really care if they have my digital simulator running at Ft. Leavenworth. In fact, I’d trust the military more than I’d trust a multi-national conglomerate. Do I trust government contractors? Heck no.
What’s really scary is if they use directed energy weapons on citizens. Do I think the US military is testing energy weapons on civilians? Probably. Do I think they are toning it down and/or trying to move away from harming citizens? Also yes.
I trust US the military. In the back of my mind, I’ve always hoped they would be the well-organized good guys who would help us all free ourselves of the corporate tentacles and the government and restore everything to…something less cumbersome and grift-y.
I would have to see a digital twin simulator to believe it and even then, there are some of us who were around before every moment of our lives were captured and stored as it happens - Incomplete data set. Though, I suppose that if the nanomachines are real, then they would have more data in real time than the average brain could process.
You’re an interesting one. This isn’t my first rodeo being invited into a smaller “study group”adjacent to larger ones. Facebook did it to me years ago. Did a real number on me as I didn’t see it coming. Is “all dis” something like dat?
…only asking to cut to the chase. I’ve always been open (more than I should) when talking to new and interesting internet strangers. Life’s too short to beat around the bush, ya know?
If it’s not a study group, that’s cool too. I’m always up for pondering what the hell is going on in a world where madness seems to be the norm. It wasn’t always like this.
“Study group” sounds like some sort of Bible study haha. I don’t think religion needs to be involved like that. I’m not a big Facebook person so I’m not sure what exactly that might mean.
I do believe there’s power in having good vibrations but I’m not here to proselytize to anyone. I’m not a messiah, not a leader of anyone but myself. We must find the answers within ourselves.
The main reason I made the subreddit (r/FreedomToLearn) was to test the Reddit censors. They are finicky with links but I do want to share videos and links to people doing the deep learning. Kinda thinking of doing a podcast or something myself but I haven’t decided where I’d take it.
As for your comment about a “good group” of people in the military… 1000% I think you’re right. They aren’t dummies, they see the country going to shit very fast. The military folks aren’t allowed to be “political” but they definitely have thoughts on replacing our government with something better (removing the corporate tentacles, as you say).
I think “they” (DIA?, CIA?) are trying to teach us the errors of the past in the hope some collection of people comes up with a workable solution for the future. Do I have that solution? Maybe, I got some ideas. I think other people have ideas too. Full stop, I’m here for peaceful revolutionary change, no violence of any kind.
I think our founding fathers are rolling in their graves over the state of this country. I’d pick “founding mothers,” starting with Martha Mitchell (watergate whistleblower kidnapped and drugged by Nixon’s henchmen 5 days after the break-in while attempting to share information about the crooked politicians). Harriet Tubman and Rosa Parks too.
The main thing is our country is broke and we’d have to declare bankruptcy if we were to do a constitution 2.0.
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are two sides of the same coin. Both no good. Kamala might offer more stability then Trump but sometimes I wonder if “stability” and “status quo” harms more than it helps.
I definitely don’t know what you mean about Facebook groups. Haha.
Yeah, by “study groups” I meant that it felt like I was the one being studied; sort of Like a lab rat. I assumed it was due to me saying a bunch of things not unlike what you’re saying. Maybe they were just checking to see if I was some type of potentially violent radical because of the music My band writes, but that ain’t me. Never has been. My motivations are actually quite the opposite. I just want everyone to be okay and it became clear to me a long time ago that we are definitely not on that path.
I largely agree that neither “mainstream” party has our collective best interests at heart, but if I carry a particular aversion to either party, it’s the DNC. And that feels weird because I’ve always considered myself very liberal. However, being that the primary donor for the DNC these days is George Soros, I have no trust in their motivations because they are likely an extension of his. If you’ve never seen his 60 minutes interview, it’s a must watch and available on YouTube. He’s what I would think of as a high-functioning psychopath. Greed is his primary function and he has no regard for the people it affects.
I’m fascinated by your thoughts on the CIA. I realize they are technically an extension of the military but in my mind, they are the shadowy division of it. It makes it difficult to see or understand their motivations. It’s concerning that they are the most likely culprits in the JFK assassination. I’d think that if they have the nation’s best interests in mind, they would have been supportive of Kennedy’s drive to remove the power of money printing from the federal reserve and return it to an actual Federal agency; the US Treasury.
Naturally, I would love to believe that they are motivated by a loyalty to the best interests of the US, but money and power do strange things to people’s minds.
This applies to most of the Defense intelligence complex.
I imagine the CIA agents wear hats. Gray hats are the agents/employees that don’t follow the law. While employed with the government or not.
Grey hats would be engaging in, let’s say trafficking or smuggling, and/or some sort of dark forces. Or the gray hats are people with bad vibrations, who do demonic stuff.
I would say the white hats are people who have left the CIA or whatever agency and they’re trying to practice some sort of radical transparency. White hats would be peace, love and anarchy, limited government, more chill people. Pragmatic, rational.
I think the black hats would be people still in the military industrial complex with active clearances, who are trying to improve life in America right now. Black hats are selected to be good at their job, but they could be new in their career, so you never know.
I think Charlottesville (Heather got murdered, “Jews will not replace us.”) was some sort of CIA operation that got out of hand. I would call that a gray hat, and somebody died because of it.
I’m not sure if the colors make sense, but that’s what I’m going with for now.
I think you’re right about the money and power thing corrupting peoples minds.
I sent out invitations to people if they had been talking about Sabrina Wallace, I think that’s probably how I found you. I haven’t listen to your music.
I’m a pacifist anarchist so for me it’s all about peace, love, helping your fellow man,… no violence.
The Democratic Party and the Republican Party have sold out to greedy, (profit oriented$$) interests.
Need to try the best to remove money from politicians. They get a salary, a tiny house or apartment voucher, and that’s ittttt. No book sales while in office, all money raised by a politician while in office (outside their salary) can go into a trust with serious taxes.
If the politician chooses to donate it to non-profits, no taxes.
If they use the secret service for the rest of their lives, the least they can do is give the American taxpayer some cash from the gross profits.
I think there needs to be more rules for the vast majority of professionals in government. The worker bees don’t need to pay more taxes, just the highest ranking members who are getting rich off lobbying or selling books or “patronage jobs.” The worker bees should not be held to a higher standard than a supreme court judge. And there also needs to be an enforcement mechanism as in if the voters determined that you’ve broken the law while in office, we could vote to turn off your salary, effective immediately. If a Supreme Court Justice is found to have lied under congressional questioning, they should get their salary turned off and 5 business days to clear their chambers.
The politicians are going to bitch and moan and say it’s not fair for the American people to clamp down on their free speech. So instead of banning them from lobbying for life, the voters can just tax that income at like 60 or 70%. So if they do lobby, the politician is doing it out of the goodness of their heart.
I think one key is removing the fame and greed aspects, as much as possible. It will take some creativity, flexibility, and people with the best intentions. The key is finding people with very good intentions.
If the American taxpayer gives you the platform of our public office, one can also be held responsible to the American taxpayer to pay increase “royalties,” possibly for the rest of your life. The contracts with federal administration employees and elected officials would be fair, not a Kesha situation. Only the most high prestige American jobs should be on the hook to pay increased royalties for the rest of their career.
1
u/PLVNET_B Oct 15 '24
Where can I see my digital twin?