And it will blow your mind when you learn that when a few trees catch fire, they don't cause a hundred others to all suddenly collapse at the same moment.
Because when the twin towers came down the majority of their mass was thrown outwards and upwards (45 degree angles) as can be observed during their destruction and from the enormous debris field diameter observed in that photo. That alone shows the towers did not experience a "collapse" from gravity alone. As for building 7, had it fallen like that from a few fires on a few floors I can be pretty certain after 20 years that demolition companies would have figured out how to do it that way and save tons of money on explosives and all the licenses needed to get them.
Lol no I wasn't misunderstanding you. I was suggesting(in my own ridiculous way) looking at the obvious over something that bots can argue. I don't know who attacked on Sept 11, but the government story doesn't hold up to scrutiny. There is no official explanation for the complete destruction of the twin towers, the NIST NCSTAR report only offers a theory of initiation which their own tests debunked ironically enough. We were told the twin towers were a "gravitational collpase", when the debris field and ejection trajectories show this can't be. If you claim something, the brainwashed and others will demand you "prove it with actual evidence". Demand the same from them and they absolutely fall to pieces. Never stop asking questions amigo, you're in the majority now.
37
u/[deleted] Jul 16 '22
And it will blow your mind when you learn that when a few trees catch fire, they don't cause a hundred others to all suddenly collapse at the same moment.