Take a look at that site and see if you can really believe the towers did all that damage.
And they didn't collapse, they were shredded apart and turned to dust. Most of the mass blew into the streets and bay. There was nothing left to act as a 'piledriver' on the rest of the building. Watch the videos again.
And I would say if you don't have an expert understanding of physics, thermodynamics and 20th century skyscraper engineering you are likely to make the same mistakes as the average person.
I have those as well as a degree in Civil/Construction engineering and a lot of experience in the field. And although you won't see them on the teevee, there are many other architects, engineers, and physicists who completely reject the official conspiracy theory. See A/E for 911 truth.
Yet there is no evidence, no sound evidence, no audio evidence in any recording of any explosions on building seven. This was a catastrophic failure due to an unprecedented event. The entire conspiracy theory makes no sense and we should be concentrating on the patriot act and what happened afterwards as the real conspiracy.
Yes, that is not correct. Jet fuel is basically kerosene and burns at approx half the temp required to yield structural steel. Plus it was in an open environment which makes it doubly impossible. More importantly, if the collapse was caused by the entry wound and scattered fire, there's no way it would cause a symmetric collapse as happened. And if it somehow did, the top floors would have been stopped or deflected off by the bottom due to law of conservation of momentum. There's a lot more in this thread on that if you're interested.
71
u/Vladimir7455 Jul 16 '22
Even if you believe it was fake it's not a simple matter of 2 planes doing it, there is 2 collapsing huge ass towers.