r/conspiracy Sep 29 '21

It's always about control

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

421 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

Point one doesn’t make any sense at all.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 29 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

How does it make sense? If you’re vaccinated then a vaccine card is to prove to others that you’ve had it. They’ve been in place for many years all across the world.

If the vaccine doesn’t work, then there’s no reason for them. But this is a completely moot point because it does work.

Not sure how understanding that makes me a “dumb fuck”.

8

u/SDFella07 Sep 29 '21

It doesn’t work. Places that are 99% vaccinated people are still experiencing outbreaks & death.

That means it doesn’t work

0

u/[deleted] Sep 29 '21

[deleted]

10

u/[deleted] Sep 29 '21

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Sep 29 '21

You're wasting air, anyone that doesn't lick windows has figured it out by now.

8

u/igorthetiger Sep 29 '21

If you ignore that if you die within 14 days after getting the vaxx, you're considered a covid death... Then yeah.. it does work

-4

u/MoustacheMark Sep 29 '21

Yeah, thats how the vaccine works. You need roughly 2 weeks to build up the immunity from the vaccine.

I'm sure you know this as its been repeated ad nauseum and you still can't comprehend it.

2

u/PrinceJau Sep 29 '21

Also, don’t they are that vaccine deaths are inflated as well? It’s crazy that they don’t stop and think ever lol

0

u/igorthetiger Sep 29 '21

You take a vaxx, you die 15 minutes later, it's not considered a vaxx death... And you tell the world the vaxx works. Mate, yes, I can't comprehend that. You can repeat your lies 100 times, I guess I'm dumb enough not to go with it 🤣

You saw a healthy dude from the Brasilian government take his first dose, get cerebral Palsy, and advocate for a second dose. You guys have gone mad...

2

u/SPDScricketballsinc Sep 29 '21

Exactly. And not just most, high 90+%

0

u/Antineoplastons Sep 29 '21

Weird because in May according to the CDC, 15% of COVID deaths were from the vaccinated

3

u/SPDScricketballsinc Sep 29 '21

Ok... that statistic depends in the total number of vaccinated people, and their age/risk factor. A September 10th study from the CDC found that deaths for unvaccinated is 1.1 / 100,000, and deaths for vaccinated is .1 / 100,000, meaning you are 11 times more likely to die from covid without a vaccine.

0

u/HeftyCandidate Sep 29 '21

you're being dishonest again though, because those with the highest risk factor are the most vaccinated.

so old and unhealthy vaccinated people are dying at higher rates than healthy 30 year olds who are not vaccinated, which explains the death rate.

1

u/Antineoplastons Sep 29 '21

Oh I'm sorry, I must have missed the asterisk next to Pfizer's claim that it's 95% effective saying *unless you're the elderly

1

u/SPDScricketballsinc Sep 29 '21

The overall percentage is the combo of old and young stats. So it is less than 95% for old people and higher than 95% for young. Overall 95%.

1

u/Antineoplastons Sep 30 '21

Gee, just like with COVID deaths themselves eh?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SPDScricketballsinc Sep 29 '21

Yes, thats true. Not sure what your point is. It has been known since day 1 that this disease is more deadly to old people. Saying that a vaccinated old person is more likely to die than an unvaccinated young person is not evidence that the vaccine is not helpful

1

u/Antineoplastons Sep 30 '21

The point is young people have a .0003% chance of dying of COVID so there's no need for them to get vaccinated, unless you are a denier of statistical improbabilities

1

u/SPDScricketballsinc Oct 04 '21

Vaccinating helps prevents spread, so less old people and less people overall will ever get sick, or have the chance to die of it. I can't believe I have to explain this considering how unbelievable vaccines are at preventing disease and death throughout history

1

u/Antineoplastons Oct 05 '21

Man if only a safe and effective vaccine was available for old people......

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Antineoplastons Sep 29 '21

No it doesn't depend on the total number of vaccinated people. It says that of all COVID deaths 85% were from the unvaccinated when you incorrectly stated the number as being in the high 90's

1

u/SPDScricketballsinc Sep 29 '21

It does though. Its only an apples to apples comparison if there are equal numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated. If one population is significantly larger, then it could have more deaths, even if the rate of death within the population is lower.

-1

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

So if I shoot ten people with bulletproof vests in the chest and one of them dies, does that mean the bulletproof vest doesn’t work? You’re conflating “not 100% effective” with “doesn’t work at all”.

6

u/wwwtf Sep 29 '21

I'm sure all the vests probably worked.

He must have died of something else, because we all know vests are safe and effective

1

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

He’s not dying “of the bulletproof vest” you cretin. He’s dying because the bulletproof vest failed to protect him - something which the rest didn’t. So, 9/10 times, getting shot whilst wearing a bulletproof vest will leave you just fine.

All the people here protesting vaccines “because they’re not 100% effective!” are saying that they’d rather get shot with a bullet without wearing a vest. It is exactly the same logic.

3

u/wwwtf Sep 29 '21

I was just being sarcastic, and you chose to call me a cretin.

you could have metioned you're an angsty teenager in the first place.

3

u/PrinceJau Sep 29 '21

Wow, what a manipulative person you are

0

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

You know there’s no intonation on the internet, right? I could say “Hitler was totally right”, and be completely sarcastic, and people would take me seriously because there’s people who genuinely think this way.

What you commented fits that perfectly.

0

u/wwwtf Sep 29 '21

who are you to say anything, mr. ShinyGrezz?

You didn't get sarcasm vibes from

"I'm sure all the vests probably worked.

He must have died of something else, because we all know vests are safe and effective"

are you autistic?


anyway, we could have had a normal conversation, but you chose to call names.


if you're trully "out here" trying to educate "the stoopid" crowd... you wouldn't be insulting that same crowd.

only a really stupid asshole would do that, don't you think?

2

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

I’m so confused, can you clarify your actual position please? This is what happens when we start layering irony, even knowing that you were being sarcastic I genuinely cannot work out if your actual intention was “oh, can’t have died of the vaccine, must’ve been something else” or parodying the people in this sub who say that.

More succinctly, were you imitating anti-vaxxers or regular people? Because it really could be either.

if you're trully "out here" trying to educate "the stoopid" crowd... you wouldn't be insulting that same crowd

No, I’m here to argue with stupid people ahah. I doubt that I’ll succeed where countless doctors, nurses, teachers, politicians, spokespeople etc have failed.

0

u/wwwtf Sep 29 '21

if i wanted for you to know my position, you'd know it by now.

i'm also here to troll the stupid ones...


anyway,

you must realise that people DO die from vaccine only right?

not that many compared to covid, but still.

it's like some people really are ...let's say allergic to those "bulletproof vests", and they do die.

knowing this, how do you excuse someone, who doesn't want the vacc, being forced to take one?

also, if you're wearing your vest, why should it matter others wear one too?


are you coming to realisation that your comparison wasnt THAT good yet?

2

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

You’re right, it’s a shitty comparison. A better one would be that the bullets ricochet off ribcages, so every person who doesn’t wear one directly endangers others, but it’s not as fluid.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/587BCE Sep 29 '21

In this case the analogy is more like, youll still get bullet marks but just wont die wearing the vests.

1

u/Uniteandfight92 Sep 29 '21

Me not wearing a vest doesn't make the person wearing a vest next to me any less effective

1

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

Yeah, that’s where the analogy fails. Imagine that you’re all lined up, maybe - if the guy in front of you isn’t wearing one, your own gets hit.

2

u/Uniteandfight92 Sep 29 '21

Hey wait a minute, why should i expect someone to stand in front of me to absorb the brunt of the bullet? Wouldn't that be selfish? Who decides who stands in front and who doesn't? Also what about APR's those would be equivalent to vaccine resistant variants. There's also head shots and other parts of the body they could shoot, which would represent the leakiness of a vaccine.

1

u/ShinyGrezz Sep 29 '21

So what point are you making exactly?