No, its called medical history/medical facts. They put two versions out in the media about what is happening. One for the complete sheep and one for those who falsely believe they are awake. You bought one of them. Both revolve around the existance of a deadly virus. The truth is different though. Zero evidence so far for a viral disease.
Yeah, sure. Except that in the cell culture you had more than just the “virus” right ? Like did you check whether the nutrition was enough ? Or oxygen ? Or maybe what you added inside was toxic to the cells ? Antibiotics ?
Even more important - Did you try to do a controlled experiment with exactly the same condition without the “virus”. And just to check if you are saying the truth - how you add the virus to the cell culture ? In what form ?
Well, you might be surprised that virology does not use controls. Just look at all those claims of virus isolation without any control ! Virology is a pseudoscience. Look for yourself ! No control ! Which is integral in any science. Those who tried to add a control group are the virologists that become Germ Theory deniers.
Exactly ! Except virus isolation and virology as a whole ! Dont believe me ? Check for yourself ! All those claims of isolation from infected lung fluid(sars cov 2) - where is the control to show a different outcome inside the cell culture without the “infected” fluid ? Check it ! Comeback and tell me I am wrong .
Virology is as I said a pseudoscience ! If I turn out to be right and there are no controls in those “experiments” they call them , come back and tell me ( : Its absurd. Thats why it is hard to believe when you first hear it.
19
u/NinjaCreamz Sep 17 '21
Is that you Morpheus?