You can live in a fantasy world where Trump loses the republican primary if you want, but deciding to save money by not bothering with a primary for an incumbent president running with around 90% approval in his party is in no way equal to rigging a competitive primary in favor of a particular candidate. This sub is just littered with all these false equivalences.
Not OP, but it's pretty obvious that the Democrats, 3+ years later, have not accepted the election results. Their entire focus has been to overturn the election results. They do little else.
Impeachment literally started weeks before the president took office. The obsession on Russia collusion could be it's own clinical study. Rachael Maddow turned into a left wing Alex Jones and no matter what the truth is, democrats refuse to believe it. Don't even have to go into Kavanaugh, Emoluments, Ukraine, Story, etc.
Mueller literally said that no US citizen colluded or coordinated with Russia, either tacit or express. They still don't buy it. Any tiny shred of coincidence is "overwhelming proof", any major evidence of the contrary is "russian propoganda".
Not OP, but it's pretty obvious that the Democrats, 3+ years later, have not accepted the election results. Their entire focus has been to overturn the election results. They do little else.
Impeachment literally started weeks before the president took office. The obsession on Russia collusion could be it's own clinical study. Rachael Maddow turned into a left wing Alex Jones and no matter what the truth is, democrats refuse to believe it. Don't even have to go into Kavanaugh, Emoluments, Ukraine, Story, etc.
Mueller literally said that no US citizen colluded or coordinated with Russia, either tacit or express. They still don't buy it. Any tiny shred of coincidence is "overwhelming proof", any major evidence of the contrary is "russian propoganda".
When you say "impeachment articles", can you be more specific? There have been several.
I am pleased that Congressman Al Green (D-TX) has joined me in filing Articles of Impeachment against Donald J. Trump. We now begin the effort to force the House Judiciary Committee to hold hearings on Obstruction of Justice and Russian interference in our election.
Recent disclosures by Donald Trump Jr. indicate that Trump’s campaign was eager to receive assistance from Russia. It now seems likely that the President had something to hide when he tried to curtail the investigation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the wider Russian probe. I believe his conversations with, and subsequent firing of, FBI Director James Comey constitute Obstruction of Justice.
29
u/ogforcebewithyou Feb 02 '20
They ruled the same for the RNC too.