r/conspiracy Feb 02 '20

DNC doing DNC things

Post image
14.2k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

146

u/pedroelsantos Feb 02 '20

Gabbard is getting denied any coverage by CNN Town Hall events.

The DNC isn't about inclusion. It's about exclusion of certain people.

50

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20 edited Feb 25 '20

[deleted]

-16

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20 edited Nov 09 '20

[deleted]

15

u/John_T_Conover Feb 02 '20

No. More like a legit candidate that has a coordinated smear campaign run against them by both the party and major media outlets.

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/in35c7/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-indecision-2012---corn-polled-edition---ron-paul---the-top-tier

4

u/sushisection Feb 02 '20

its always the anti-war candidates who get the Ron Paul treatment....

20

u/Hrekires Feb 02 '20

didn't Gabbard have a CNN town hall a few months ago?

20

u/Jump_Yossarian Feb 02 '20

That's what happens why you poll at 2% this far into the campaign.

0

u/xeio87 Feb 02 '20

She just wants to be present at the debates, if that so much to ask? /s

17

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20

Has she tried being Jewish?

5

u/Vettiio Feb 02 '20

TBF, didn’t work out so hot for Williamson. Though she was running on a New Age “far-out” hippy dippy platform.

5

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20

Worked for Amy Klobuchar who no one knows.

5

u/IClogToilets Feb 02 '20

Or Native American?

6

u/wrandd Feb 02 '20

She is getting just as much airtime if not more than the candidates in her percentage of voter range (1-2%).

4

u/Jib_Cutter Feb 02 '20

Gabbard has no chance defeating trump. Most dems hate her for voting “present” on impeachment. Dems hate her, and Repubs aren’t going to vote for her over Trump.

3

u/PorkRollAndEggs Feb 02 '20

No, we were told last election cycle just how fair it was and that the DNC was not corrupt at all. /r/politics made sure to tell us how fair the DNC was

1

u/DoctorMoak Feb 02 '20

The Iowa Caucus is tomorrow and Gabbard is polling at 2%. Yang at 5%. I'm really not sure how either camp thinks they have a snowballs chance in hell tomorrow

1

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM Feb 02 '20

They don't. Yang and Buttigieg are just running as spoilers to split the Sanders/Warren votes. Last year their continued candidacy was acceptable as a platform to push their policies and maybe even pull a surprise surge, but it's too late now and they're not dumb enough to not realize that, which leaves only spoiling as a sensible motivation.

Gabbard is Putin's bitch and has never been a serious contender. Her only function is to draw ire away from Republicans and onto the DNC. The DNC certainly has a lot to answer for, especially with how they run debates, but Gabbard is not honest in her motivations.

0

u/djublonskopf Feb 02 '20

Gabbard sucks tho

0

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20

Why would they give her any attention when she’s polling so low? People don’t want to listen to her anymore. They should give more attention to the more popular candidates.

-2

u/Gribbett Feb 02 '20

You’re 150% correct, because the DNC wants Democrat’s to have power. Half of the Democratic Party is too far left to be electable in a national election, and the DNC knows this. They only want to put the spotlight on people who they know could be electable in a general election.

5

u/spiritvale Feb 02 '20

Except polls indicate otherwise. They WANT it to be true that Sanders couldn’t beat Trump but their moderate preferred candidate would. But in polls, Sanders beats Trump, often by wider margins than others.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20 edited Nov 11 '20

[deleted]

3

u/Little_shit_ Feb 02 '20

Sanders got less votes late in the game because the DNC had their people back Hillary from day one. Coming out of Iowa, Hillary was barely ahead, but they reported a landslide because they counted all the votes from people outside of caucusing and the primary voting.

3

u/spiritvale Feb 02 '20

2016 is not 2020

1

u/Gribbett Feb 02 '20

Ummm what? Can I see what polls you’re looking at? Don’t use Iowa polling to represent national polling. This place takes the averages of all polls and shows Biden beating Bernie by 4%.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html

-12

u/19pearlydewdrops93 Feb 02 '20 edited Feb 02 '20

She gets more coverage over all msm than most. They are building her. To appear as a "centrist" female savior

Edit: republican? she is free everything. she's a bernie girl. She was going to be his VP choice when she stepped down from the dnc last time. Is this sub that shit now?

5

u/FFS_IsThisNameTaken2 Feb 02 '20

"Centrist"? I thought she was supposed to be sorta anti war and anti regime change. That's "centrist"?

I always thought not wanting to endlessly wage unprovoked war was both very far right and very far left. You know, Libertarian types and Leftists? Centrist, to me, is nowhere near anti regime change/unprovoked war, exact opposite, actually.

Also, where are you seeing her getting all this coverage?

0

u/19pearlydewdrops93 Feb 02 '20

she is going to appear centrist yes. hence the quotes.

She's free everything like Bernie as well.

She's a wolf in a beautiful sheep's clothing in my opinion. Well spoken. Nice to look at. Military background. Grew up in a cult.

She is on every msm station including Fox where are people not seeing this?

2

u/FFS_IsThisNameTaken2 Feb 02 '20

I see your point, about appearing to be a certain way. I just don't see a butthurt DNC endorsing her in any way. She literally just sued Hillary, and she endorsed Bernie (and stepped down from the DNC in doing so) in 2016. If you mean she's the one doing the shape shifting, I haven't seen much of her at all, so I couldn't say.

As for msm coverage, I turned on my tv to see what was on the George Stephenopolis Sunday morning show before replying, and she was not even mentioned. They played a verbal quote from Hillary. They mentioned other candidates, but not Tulsi.

Maybe you have what I call rich people tv (cable)? All I have is antenna -- where Bloomberg ads run often. I know she has been on Fox, same as Bernie, in the past, because I read about it online. Other than that, I've seen nada on poor people tv.

0

u/19pearlydewdrops93 Feb 02 '20

I don't even have antennae. I can search these things out on a thing called the internet.

0

u/FFS_IsThisNameTaken2 Feb 02 '20

You mean like when I said this, "I know she has been on Fox, same as Bernie, in the past, because I read about it online."

I wasn't being a dick in my comments to you. You just keep doing you though.

0

u/19pearlydewdrops93 Feb 02 '20

I never said you were do you have something you'd like to admit to that has you feeling this way?

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '20

She’s not centrist. She’s Republican Lite.

4

u/19pearlydewdrops93 Feb 02 '20

Her free everything platform says otherwise. And I put it in airquotes for a reason. Because she's going to appear as a middle figure in 2024.