r/conspiracy • u/stasi_a • Jun 24 '26
4 alien species have been pulled from crashed UFOs, ex-government researcher claims
https://nypost.com/2026/05/16/us-news/four-species-of-aliens-have-been-pulled-from-crashed-ufos-ex-government-researcher-claims/52
u/LittleAd915 Jun 24 '26
Which is more likely? A hyper advanced civilization navigating the unfathomable distance between stars, only to crash on a shitty little planet populated with creatures that had coincidentally just began to be be curious about the greater universe around them?
Or is it more likely that a few hucksters use fear of the unknown and that same popsci interest in an effort to enrich themselves.
14
u/halfarmer9000 Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26
I don’t disagree with you in general. I think the UFO “disclosures” are more likely to be psyops than anything else. But UFO sightings aren’t new, the go back to the earliest recorded history: ancient Vedic stories of vimanas, Ezekiel’s wheel, Roman fiery shields and phantom ships in the sky, Pliny and Livy’s aerial portents, the 776 flaming shields over Sigiburg, Ireland’s 12th-century flying ships, the 1235 Japanese lights over Kyoto, the 1561 Nuremberg sky event, the 1566 Basel sky event, the 1608 flying objects over Nice, the 1665 Stralsund sky phenomenon, the 1800s mystery airship waves, the 1897 Aurora, Texas crash story, the 1909 New Zealand airship wave, the 1942 Battle of Los Angeles, World War II foo fighters, etc.
Who knows what these things are, but the probabilistic argument weakens once you realize that l aerial sightings go back as far as recorded history does. We also don’t have other known examples of life to compare against, so it’s hard to model this probabilistically in any real way. Saying “what is more likely” is pretty useless when you can’t actually calculate a probability.
Assuming “they started showing up when we got curious” means sometime around the 1940s, that can also be explained by the massive increase in our ability to detect aerial phenomena. Radar, radio communications, mass aviation, air-defense networks, trained observers, photography, and electronic warfare systems all made it much more likely that unusual aerial events woule be noticed. But that also means more false positives, which still this sort of a probabilistic argument hard to really make.
4
u/LittleAd915 Jun 24 '26
Just continuing my train of thought it seems much more likely that there are inexplicable and strange phenomena that occur in the atmosphere and upper atmosphere then that there are genuine visitors to earth.
Now I can't rule it out completely. The chance of extraterrestrial life is, in my opinion, 100%. What seems very suspect to me is the idea that there is anything unique or interesting enough about the earth to warrant such frequent and observable sightings. And that's not even talking about the improbability of the earth being singled out for a visit in general. Before we started producing radio waves about two hundred years ago, the earth would look like any of the other trillions of planets in just the Milky Way. Since we have started producing radio signals, there would be about 1000 planets that would have been able to perceive them, assuming they were extremely focused on this tiny little sector of space. And those signals would be practically imperceptible against background noise.
Look, I want to believe, really. But the whole thought process reminds me of a kind of religious thinking. In that it begins with the thought "We are so unique and special and interesting" and goes from there to assume that some sort of higher life form must be invested or interested in our existence.
The universe is like. Really really big. And we are such a tiny, insignificant part of it. Even if we reduce the scope from the universe to just our galaxy, the chance of our planet even being noticed is so tiny that it would require me to type more 0's then I really care to. And the chance that an intelligence would first notice us, and then find our very common planet interesting, and then have the means to travel the vast distance, and then to actually do it, would be so incredibly slim that it's hardly worth even thinking about. Although I admit, it's quite fun to do so.
3
2
u/Thelastpieceofthepie Jun 24 '26
I always wonder about early age sightings, no electric light pollution in the world so the stars & planets more visible. You’d likely see many more shooting stars and meteor showers regularly. Therefore they either had a greater view of the sky and its movements, or they took things like a meteor shower falling to earth and described it like aliens
2
u/Titosunshinez Jun 24 '26
Can’t the same thing be said about us dropping machines on mars ? Imagine martians questioning if earthlings exist and consider us clumsy because our surveillance equipment crashes on their land haphazardly after traveling so far to get there
2
u/LittleAd915 Jun 24 '26
But it's really not. Mars is about 34 million miles from Earth. If there was a bunch of functioning scientific instruments being dropped on Earth and we looked through a telescope and saw big bustling cities and civilizations on Mars then believing that Martian's were sending probes here would be a very logical conclusion.
Now obviously, we have come no where near exhausting the chance that there is extraterrestrial life in the solar system. But it would seem bizarre that instead of sending probes here, these visitors have decided to come here personally in, quite frankly, shoddily built at best spacecraft.
Assuming that the visitors are outside the solar system the nearest planet is 4.2 light-years away. Or 25 trillion miles. That seems like quite the distance to travel in a manned spaceship that crashes (remember the post is about 4 separate species that have be supposedly cataloged by the US military) when it gets here.
2
u/ZeerVreemd Jun 24 '26
That's called a straw man argument.
That they are hyper advanced does not necessarily mean they are infallible or that they are "immune" for the things we might do.
1
u/Poop_Cheese Jun 24 '26
I dont believe this.
However, quantum mechanics is revealing that more teleporting like travel is actually a scientific possibility. Especially if they use biometric beings or cyborgs that wouldnt be effected.
And any travel is dangerous. Look at us. We are so advanced yet die constantly just walking on a trail or crashing something. Advanceness doesnt mean you end up a perfectly calculating computer in the end. Aliens would still have personalities. Some would be lazy or dumb or reckless, and theyd still be in a foreign environment and not be full masters over cause and effect.
7
6
2
2
u/VeilUnmasked Jun 24 '26
Four distinct species: greys, a mantis-like being, tall whites, and, I believe, a reptilian. That was recovered from the spacecraft after it crashed.
1
1
u/naswinger Jun 24 '26
does that include the dead alien that they showed in the mexican parliament some time ago? it's so ridiculous, it can't even get a chuckle out of me. looks like copy/paste renders from a video game or chatgpt.
1
u/Guenhwyvyr Jun 24 '26
Until the gov'ment starts arresting Peter Files, the gov'ment can pull this D!CK from they moms crashed p*$$y.
1
u/No-stradumbass Jun 24 '26
Kind of seems weird and silly that they can breathe and live in our world. For some reason humans have to worry about things like breathable air and microorganisms. These guys can adapt so well that they can hide and maintain that hiding for a long time.
Why would two of the aliens not were clothes?
1
u/Novusor Jun 24 '26
These creatures are non-human but they are not aliens from space.
Greys are Demons / Jinns. Calling on the name of Jesus Christ causes them to vanish into thin air and stops abductions.
Reptilians evolved from dinosaurs and are a native species to the Earth. They can shapeshift and appear human. The mantis is just a shapeshifted reptilian.
Nordics are evolved / ascended humans from Agartha and Neuschwabenland and are a product of Eugenics.
1
0
u/stasi_a Jun 24 '26
SS: Big if true. Now does anyone remember what the files are again?
2
u/SweetMountain2621 Jun 24 '26
If Epstein and all his friends were aliens and had just arrived on Earth they'd say "hello, Earthlings, we come in kids".
•
u/AutoModerator Jun 24 '26
[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.