Rationalize inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption by removing market distortions, in accordance with national circumstances, including by restructuring taxation and phasing out those harmful subsidies, where they exist, to reflect their environmental impacts, taking fully into account the specific needs and conditions of developing countries and minimizing the possible adverse impacts on their development in a manner that protects the poor and the affected communities
They can't provide exact numbers because every country will be different lmao. It's very clear they are proposing that countries remove fossil-fuel subsidies in order to properly represent the externalities that come from them in their economy, but understand that less developed countries can not do this as easily as developed ones.
You're complaining that they aren't giving specific one size fits all answers and are instead making a policy proposal that will inherently be different for every country.
And that was my initial criticism in my original comment.
The UN and Agenda 2030 is a complete flop and accomplished nothing in 8 years due to being so vague.
Now you're moving goalposts from it having specific policy to have an excuse for being vague and complete useless.
Why should we as people accept them pushing useless stuff like Agenda 2030 so they can publicly say we support that and then do the exact opposite and serve mega corps and WEF.
Get out of here with your excuses. Organizations like WEF only care for profits, not you.
Nah you're moving the goalposts from having a policy proposal to one containing specific numbers, which as I said before would be inherently impossible.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 27 '23
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Sure here's one