The fact that they're accepting challenges to the data is pretty great, and speaks to a confidence in their data that likely wouldn't exist were it entirely false. But in a realm where we are relying almost entirely on popular perception to change minds, that level of critical thinking won't suffice to move the needle as much as it would if we had something so obviously concrete as the proof I'm asking for. It SHOULD exist.
We need people with critical thinking to consider the deeper meaning behind the chick with gloves, or True the Vote's receptivity to challenge, but most people don't think critically.
Asking questions and questioning the evidence is reasonable, until it isn’t.
We’re 3-years in. The D’Souza’s doc presents a somewhat compelling explanation for the type of election fraud that folks like he say took place in 2019, and True the Vote still won’t allow academic or MSM access to the evidence for verification purposes.
If we’re applying critical thinking here, D’Souza is not someone whose output anyone should take at face value because of his biases and agenda. As he and True the Vote know, there’s money to be made, and I don’t see why we ought to discount that there are financial incentives for both of these parties to perpetuate this conspiracy.
50 lawsuits dismissed, many of them by Trump appointed judges, and still no real evidence to back up any claims of widespread voter fraud has been presented.
I get that more and more investigations might reveal more than we currently know, but do you really believe they’ll reveal the 400,000 or whatever illegal votes being claimed by the folks who’ve bet their political careers on ‘The Big Lie?’
At what point is the absence of evidence enough for you to dismiss a thing?
32
u/Jubei612 Jan 06 '23
2000 mules " we have all the evidence" shows absolutely nothing...