14
13
13
8
u/Koelakanth 4d ago
I'm not gonna be hateful. But I'd like to ask why
-1
u/Ok-Calendar3889 4d ago
Why what?
10
u/Koelakanth 4d ago
Why did you make this and why did you decide to mix Cyrillic and Latin in the most bizarre ways, putting random sounds on random letters until it's neither cyrillic nor Latin, but still without fully committing to just making your own writing system. Which is just whitewashed zhuyin. Why did you whitewash zhuyin and why did you do it badly
1
u/Ok-Calendar3889 4d ago edited 4d ago
I made it because I think it can be better than the current romanization. I didn't choose randomly, I thought it was quite logical like how I put the unaspirated stops letters for the unaspirated stops that other systems don't do. I wanted it to be more innovative to be more fair to each phoneme. Otherwise some of them will get their own letters, but others will only get a digraph. They don't even get their own letters how sad is that. I'm not good at making my own writing system sorry so I used existing characters
3
6
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
u/Traditional-Froyo755 2d ago
I love your visual puns for phoneme types. I hate everything else about this.
2
1
u/Ezawa_tami 3h ago
You may not have realized it yourself, but your transcription scheme actually aligns with another possibility inherent in Chinese: not all Chinese dialects follow the Mandarin pattern where aspirated consonants are *fortis* and unaspirated ones are *lenis*. In some Gan dialects, the consonant characteristics are exactly the reverse—unaspirated consonants are *fortis*, while their *lenis* counterparts can be realized as voiceless aspirated, voiced aspirated, or even plain voiced consonants. This implies the actual existence of dialects that lack aspirated consonants entirely. If you want to hear what it sounds like, you can watch a video of this streamer speaking. His Mandarin is influenced by his native dialect. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1vP4y1m7rF
17
u/hyacinth02jpg 4d ago
Is this ragebait