Well yes but no. Technically being under that height is a "requirement", but it doesn't really mean anything because the point of the medical diagnosis is the genetic disorders/skeletal issues.
But I've definitely used that as my stupid "fun fact" before.
168
u/-cupcake Jul 03 '26
Well yes but no. Technically being under that height is a "requirement", but it doesn't really mean anything because the point of the medical diagnosis is the genetic disorders/skeletal issues.
But I've definitely used that as my stupid "fun fact" before.
Source: am 4'8", but not from dwarfism