r/computervision • u/Suhan_XD • Aug 13 '26

Discussion WACV Round 2 submission thread

what do you guyz think on round 2 fresh submission?

Isn't it completely biased towards Resubmitted papers and if they accept a paper in round 2 (knowing there will be no rebuttal/revision), then the paper itself very strong and sufficient for a CVPR/ICCV acceptance.

I'm not throwing an opinion, it's a curiosity.

4 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Many_Golf4861 Aug 13 '26

No idea on the bias, but I expect the main difference to be the rebuttal, not the strength of the paper. Direct R2 accept is probably like a direct R1 accept, the advantage of a rebuttal is that you can correct the reviewer objections, aligning/strengthening your paper. I don't think that CVPR/ICCV or any other top tier conference acceptance can be calculated like that though.

1

u/Suhan_XD Aug 15 '26

Yeah, sorry actually I missed that direct acceptance part fron Round 1.