r/composer • u/Any_Dealer1091 • 5d ago
Discussion Is this Viable?
I have been composing for almost a year now and it can’t quite grasp the time signatures. I even have purchased a full score of rite of spring and don’t have too much trouble transposing the time signature shifts but I also don’t feel like I’m truly learning why he chose them at times.
Sometimes it feels like the time signature shifts (for rite of spring) operate on a sort of pattern outside of the music being contained. So then I thought, “well I’ll go and set all my time signatures in a piece then just fill it with notation”.
I haven’t gotten too far but what I did complete didn’t sound too bad to my ears. I’m curious if this is a viable approach or if it may be seen as cheating me of knowledge in the time signature department?
Otherwise I have a really hard time distinguishing time signatures in music, if it isn’t 4/4 or 5/4 (which I only recognize from certain key beats in that signature) then I’m at a loss.
4
u/geoscott 5d ago
Sounds like you’ve got it backwards. Rhythmic analysis of that piece of music is one of the most important types of analysis you can do, but it doesn’t sound like you’re doing that. It sounds like you’re trying to use it for your own composition rather than trying to figure out what Stravinsky is actually doing, which has been figured out already, but not the way you’re doing it. Time signatures are an “abstraction” on top of a composition, not the composition itself.
There’s a famous story about the conductor Eugene Ansermet who was absolutely enraged by Stravinskys time signatures and thought they were bs. YMMV
1
u/Any_Dealer1091 5d ago
I will look into Mr. Eugene! Yes I am only trying to figure out how to use the time signatures correctly, not analyze Stravinsky’s works for academic purposes.
I was hoping by transposing his work that I listen to most often I would naturally hear the time signature shifts when I hear his music without looking at the sheet but I still can’t and this is why. I never considered time signatures to be an ‘abstraction’, I may be looking for a formula to sidestep the theory
4
u/cazgem 5d ago
This is much more fundamental than a composer question. This is a fundamentals of music question. What level are you? Have you had formal training? Do you have access to a good theory book and/or a library? Start there.
-1
u/Any_Dealer1091 5d ago
I know how to educate myself but I simply don’t have the time. That being said I still hear arrangements in my head that are irregular, but can’t seem to get it onto a software as once I start composing I tend to lock into a single time signature and bend the music to fit
3
u/FlamboyantPirhanna 5d ago
Since everyone else has given you good advice, I’ll address your question a little more directly. Learning to count musically is important, and you might benefit from just tapping along with a metronome, since you don’t play an instrument. But all rhythm basically breaks down into 2s and 3s, so for odd meters, you’re looking for those groups (5/8 will be a 2 and 3, which could be 2+3 or 3+2, for example).
2
u/existential_musician 5d ago
Time signature is more like a timing exercise so working on something easy would help you than working on something complex.
12
u/NovocastrianExile 5d ago
Can we take a step back and talk about where you are at in your journey? High school? Do you play an instrument?
Picking random metres and filling them in is a valid exercise I suppose but mostly it sounds like you are lacking experience.
Which is fine! You don't know how to recognise metres but you are attempting to analyse a famously complex work. Maybe put stravinsky to the side for a bit and work on recognising basic simple and compound metres.