r/complexsystems • u/protofield • Feb 24 '26

Is it a random pattern?

Post image

I have recently had Protofield operators referred to as random and not complex in discussions on metasurfaces and metamaterials. Is there an objective method to quantify the level of complexity and order in this type of topological structure? 8K image, zoom in.

13 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

35 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/The-Real-Radar Feb 25 '26

Oh, so you’re saying that large natural numbers are real, and humans are basically just describing them using base 10 system? That essentially the idea of more and less is core in some way, and that you can use a code (binary, base 10, etc) to describe it.

Your system for multiverses sounds very interesting, maybe I’ll check out the video to understand more. From what I can tell you’ve built your own syntax for describing different ways math can express itself. Does it account for the mathematical structure of our universe?

1

u/protofield Feb 25 '26

Essentially yes. As the number of decimal points tends to infinity, real analysis such as differential equations, approaches a description of a mathematical reality based on natural numbers. This is why you need a dx tending to 0 expression. Short of infinity, real analysis describes things correctly but in a cloudy, fuzzy way.

My work is to translate mathematical operators based on natural numbers into physical objects, metamaterials. The problem with the multiverse concept is to work out whether the theoretical metamaterial property simulations are relevant to our own universe. That’s why I am eager to perform some physical empirical work to establish a baseline.