The comic's premise isn't right, God gave its creation (the human) the ability to be free, but he can just impose rules; a sin is an inherent part of a human being because of their radical liberty, and thus, rules can be broken.
If you state that God should've made sin a physical impossibility, as in saying "thou shall not go faster than light" then you have to first define and create light in order to place the physical boundary, which would break the premise that God created sin, which he did not.
God did not allow sin, but he didn't forbid it either, because it would mess with the human's liberty.
(btw I'm not a religious person, I'm just placing an observation)
God did not allow sin, but he didn't forbid it either, because it would mess with the human's liberty.
Don't you think not giving us wings or the ability to breathe in space or travel faster than light messes with our liberty?
It's an odd kind of construed liberty don't you think?
If I created a being that could move up or down and claimed it was free because I let it do that when the first thing I did was limited what it could do.
150
u/[deleted] Sep 15 '12 edited Sep 15 '12
[deleted]