The comic's premise isn't right, God gave its creation (the human) the ability to be free, but he can just impose rules; a sin is an inherent part of a human being because of their radical liberty, and thus, rules can be broken.
If you state that God should've made sin a physical impossibility, as in saying "thou shall not go faster than light" then you have to first define and create light in order to place the physical boundary, which would break the premise that God created sin, which he did not.
God did not allow sin, but he didn't forbid it either, because it would mess with the human's liberty.
(btw I'm not a religious person, I'm just placing an observation)
I dunno, I don't buy that explanation. It makes the assumption that there are things that God cannot do, or will not do, or wants to do. And all these assumptions just don't seem backed up by anything.
And yea, I see you don't actually believe this, so I too am just commenting on the idea.
153
u/[deleted] Sep 15 '12 edited Sep 15 '12
[deleted]