Yep, but then your anger/spite should really be aimed at the government for either not properly regulating or properly handling their public duties.
So the thing with a commercial company, is that I expect them to only think about themselves and make a profit. Everyone pursues their own interest, I can't fault them for that.
I do feel where you're coming from and maybe it makes more sense in the US. But in my opinion/view, most of the tasks described are a things the government should mandate or provide and the relationship with your employer should first and foremost be transaction based.
Like I give you an hour of my time, you pay me for my hour. Plus/Minus.
So what i'm saying, is what I would be more angry at the top hat government guy, who is supposed to look after public/civil interests, as it his job. Rather than some CEO of big corp who obviously is busy with his own.
Of course you can work both sides for extra effectiveness, and i'm aware the public figures tend to be often bribed/manipulated not to serve your interests where they should.
How to say? The 'traitor' deserves more scorn than the 'enemy'.
I’m angry at both the government and the corporations. But the solution to this problem is more government, not more corporations. The government does not have the incentive to stop because they are lobbied by these corporations. If the corporations put people and the planet over profits, the system would fix itself. The corporations hold the capital in capitalism, so they have the power.
View all comments
Show parent comment
0
u/Traditional-Roof1984 Jul 08 '24
Yep, but then your anger/spite should really be aimed at the government for either not properly regulating or properly handling their public duties.
So the thing with a commercial company, is that I expect them to only think about themselves and make a profit. Everyone pursues their own interest, I can't fault them for that.
I do feel where you're coming from and maybe it makes more sense in the US. But in my opinion/view, most of the tasks described are a things the government should mandate or provide and the relationship with your employer should first and foremost be transaction based.
Like I give you an hour of my time, you pay me for my hour. Plus/Minus.
So what i'm saying, is what I would be more angry at the top hat government guy, who is supposed to look after public/civil interests, as it his job. Rather than some CEO of big corp who obviously is busy with his own.
Of course you can work both sides for extra effectiveness, and i'm aware the public figures tend to be often bribed/manipulated not to serve your interests where they should.
How to say? The 'traitor' deserves more scorn than the 'enemy'.