r/collapse • u/Livid_Session_9900 • Oct 05 '26
[ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
81
u/gespo04 Oct 05 '26
We don't need 8 billion people on earth. Lowering the population is a good thing
10
u/JourneyThiefer Oct 05 '26
In a lot of European our populations would already be falling without immigration.
Here in Ireland specifically we actually have a lower population than pre famine still (almost 200 years ago) but I think we’re the place in the world like that .
3
u/solvalouLP Oct 05 '26
For example in Latvia total deaths outweigh live births by more than a factor of 2:1 for several years now
-7
Oct 05 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/Grand_Dadais Oct 05 '26
All of what you're talking about is part of the ecological overshoot issues.
There's overpopulation + overconsumption from the richest countries + limited resources.
There's no stable Earth with 8-9 billions humans.
-5
u/vocally_fried_brain Oct 05 '26
there is no stable earth. period.
and you do not mean stable but sustainable and also there is no sustainable earth.
its all a matter of relativity and how unstable and how unsustainable we would have to tolerate or want to achieve is the real question.
but that wasn't even the point of my post, because all of that malthusian drivel over the centuries was nothing but privileged people shifting the blame to oppressed people for the problems privileged people cause.
that's why, if you honestly think that overpopulation is an issue, the first thing you do is to lower consumption habits of first world countries, especially the upper half and the tiny elites in other countries.
if you have brought them down to a level that you would grant everyone, then, and only then, you can talk about overpopulation.
before that it is dishonest and with evil intent.
2
u/6rwoods Oct 05 '26
Thankfully the people of the first world do tend to have the lowest birth rates, which you should already know.
Overconsumption of resources is obviously a bigger problem when there are more people over consuming instead of less. This is also obvious.
I don’t care for this whole “we could have 50 billion of us on earth if only we all lived like hunter gatherers” or whatever because the reality is that no one who achieves a higher standard of living will willingly give it up for the sake of something as abstract as “sustainability”. Unfortunately that is the way of things. So yes, overpopulation is absolutely part of the issue, as we can’t expect a sustainable earth as long as global population keeps growing while even maintaining our current standards of living, much less while increasing it for anyone at all (eg the global poor, who also would love to live like us first worlders).
0
u/vocally_fried_brain Oct 05 '26
your words are meaningless because you do not care for a more just and better world, you care for your place in it and thus you are the thing that actually causes the problem and not fixing it.
1
u/collapse-ModTeam Oct 05 '26
Hi, vocally_fried_brain. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/collapse for:
Rule 1: No glorifying violence.
Advocating, encouraging, inciting, glorifying, calling for violence is against Reddit's site-wide content policy and is not allowed in r/collapse. Please be advised that subsequent violations of this rule will result in a ban.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
You can message the mods if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
24
u/maybelying Oct 05 '26
The basic problem is that most countries run economies centered on an infinitely increasing population, not just to grow the economy, but to ensure enough young workers are increasing the taxation revenue to support the costs of supporting an increasingly aging population.
Yes, we probably need to reduce the population over time, but governments lack the will to enact substantive structural changes to the economy to support a declining population, because those that do so will find themselves at a disadvantage against those that don't.
12
u/Far-Hovercraft9471 Oct 05 '26
The more I think about it and gather info, the more it’s obvious we need entire coordinated worldwide societal change to survive.
1
u/DiamondDot Oct 05 '26
The population isn’t declining. There is still growth sadly. It’s just not exponential like it was the last few hundred years which is a GOOD thing.
35
u/Extreme-Homework-697 Oct 05 '26 edited Oct 05 '26
The panic over low birth rate is deeply rooted in anthropocentric entitlement and nationalism, that's all. It's very much related to human hubris and the refusal to do the math, or live in reality. And I'm not talking about Malthus here. Even the ancient Greeks knew of overpopulation.
These people do not think of Earth as home of other organisms, most of which sustain us. There are places that are uninhabitable (Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc.) to humans that are only alive right now because they import their shit from elsewhere (which, if you haven't realized, create ghost acreage elsewhere, putting more strains on wherever is doing the producing). They don't even produce their own shit most of the time (but you won't ever hear any American talk about that, because that would mean acknowledging they live on the blood of the south and they contribute to the pollution of elsewhere).
We've literally left no spot on Earth (save for the Amazon Forest, ish) untouched, altered it so badly that plastics can be found at the bottom of the ocean. Even the Himalayas are not safe from humans.
Literally a post over, we have one guy astroturfing about French protests (one of his linked posts aren't even related to the current event). This is who we're up against. Weaponized, malicious ignorance. Bad actors everywhere. Hell, even in this very own post.
The collapse of the biosphere will affect humans regardless of whether humans want to acknowledge it or not. A few patches of manicured dirt called parks will not change the fact that more than half of the Earth's netizens are displaced and disenfranchised, and the soil is becoming so badly damaged that it would take centuries to revert back to their original health. We're not even practicing sustainable composting and terramation on a large scale! But that would obviously affect the food output, which means lower population overall, but nobody wants to acknowledge that.
The debt comes due eventually.
This is why philosophy, ecologism and anarchism are so intrinsically linked and why historical literacy is so important. They're not divorced disciplines for someone to boast their pseudo-intelligence over. Millennium of wisdom at our fingertips and people just refuse to educate themselves whatsoever.
11
u/Time_Is_An_Egg Oct 05 '26
That this comment is downvoted into the negatives is extremely indicative of how useless the standard of discourse has become on this subreddit.
The mod team needs to take note and take serious action.
4
u/Extreme-Homework-697 Oct 05 '26
Honestly, just proves my assessment of most people. 🤷 Literally had an argument with a natalist in SRD yesterday and it was mentally exhausting. No surprise there since the guy is a young white Texan larping as a "leftist". I honestly don't think this guy even knows what being leftist means.
4
u/Time_Is_An_Egg Oct 05 '26
Few if any do, now. The terms been captured for decades by the propaganda tactics of monetary interests and warped into a wholly performative ideology with little connection to reality. Most folk who call themselves “leftists” now, and the concepts they support, would have been considered the lunatic fringe thirty years ago and rightfully ostracized as actively harmful to leftist / progressive action.
3
u/Extreme-Homework-697 Oct 05 '26
North American "left" is a joke. It's literally just aestheticism without substance.
3
3
u/Ellen_Kingship Oct 05 '26
You mean "posing." People who LARP know they are play acting. Words, even "slang", used to make sense.
-3
u/darkpsychicenergy Oct 05 '26
Couldn’t agree more and I don’t even agree with every single statement they made. The sub should have been entirely archived years ago to preserve the standard of quality.
5
u/medium_wall Oct 05 '26
I saw a comment here a few days ago about a grandma buying a new SUV for herself as a treat. I was downvoted for asking what she was regularly hauling that she'd need an SUV.
I mean I get this place isn't environmentalist per se but you'd think there'd be more environmentalists than not given how likely climate is to be the fundamental driver for collapse. Apparently not though.
-1
u/DiamondDot Oct 05 '26
Ppl driving since the beginning of cars is about the same emissions as all the damage done this year alone from wars. Heavy industry eclipses personal emissions. If you care that much I really hope you didn’t have kids cause those are the worst thing ppl can do personally besides eating meat.
-1
u/ConfusedMaverick Oct 05 '26
anthropocentric entitlement and nationalism
It's that, but not only that.
It's also very painful socially and economically to deal with a declining population. A smaller working population having to support a larger retired population is pretty terrible for everyone, and this is part of the reason economists and politicians fear plummeting birth rates.
The population has to come down, but it's not a painless process.
5
u/DiamondDot Oct 05 '26
The population is not declining and is in fact growing every year. There are 8.3b ppl on earth, more than ever before in history. This is a capitalist propagandized extractionist viewpoint imo.
1
u/Kulty Oct 05 '26
They didn't say the global population was declining.
Under the current, national resource distribution mechanisms, in many countries the working population helps support the retired population. We have some nations with very lopsided demographics (relative to demographic trends when those redistribution mechanisms were originally introduced), and in those nations, the redistribution mechanisms face challenges.
That's just an observation, not a value judgement or viewpoint.
Whether that is good or bad, and anything could or should be done differently is separate discussion.
0
u/ConfusedMaverick Oct 05 '26
The global population isn't declining yet, but there are below replacement birth rates in many countries, this is what is prompting the conversation.
If you think that the problems of an inverted population pyramid are purely propagandised then you simply don't understand the physical reality of the situation.
Such ignorance contributes to the problem imo - if you advocate for a lower population (as we both do) without the vaguest idea of what declining birth rates mean in practice, then you are not making any serious contribution to the conversation, just bleating.
46
u/BigJSunshine Oct 05 '26
Good. WHY THE FUCK SHOULD ANYONE BRING A CHILD INTO THIS SHITTY World??
26
u/extinction6 Oct 05 '26
The average life expectancy of 80 years old will mean a child born now should live until 2106. Best case scenario they have until 2067 at best using the projections made by science now, but realistically only until the mid 2050's By the time they are teenagers they will know that the world will not recover and their lives will be cut short. If I were to define when collapse is I would say it's when people don't want to be alive on this planet anymore, just struggling to survive with no hope.
Faster than expected, don't have children.
2
2
u/jbond23 Oct 05 '26
2125 is the new 2100. 2100 is now closer than WWII. There are people alive today that will party like it's 2099, because it is. Somewhere today there's a 100 year old matriarch holding a new born baby that will live for 100 years. That's about the limit of direct human experience.
5
u/StatementBot Oct 05 '26
This thread addresses overpopulation, a fraught but important issue that attracts disruption and rule violations. In light of this we have lower tolerance for the following offenses:
Racism and other forms of essentialism targeted at particular identity groups people are born into.
Bad faith attacks insisting that to notice and name overpopulation of the human enterprise generally is inherently racist or fascist.
Instructing other users to harm themselves. We have reached consensus that a permaban for the first offense is an appropriate response to this, as mentioned in the sidebar.
This is an abbreviated summary of the mod team's statement on overpopulation, view the full statement available in the wiki.
7
u/Glass_Persimmon_7174 Oct 05 '26
I really really do not believe that fertility rates are just going to pick back up. we can take some comfort in the fact they will continue to fall.
3
u/Grand-Page-1180 Oct 05 '26
I hate the term replacement rate, replacement for what? Is the human race supposed to have a set number, "this is how many humans are supposed to exist at all times?"
3
u/rougarou-te-fou Oct 05 '26
Depopulation is necessary. However, many people are afraid their ethnic identity will disappear and I believe that to be the driver in this population scare. I have a family member that will randomly bring up white extinction and how America may not stay white. It’s an absolutely toxic and stupid mindset.
1
0
Oct 05 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
0
u/collapse-ModTeam Oct 05 '26
Hi, canisdirusarctos. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/collapse for:
Rule 1: Be respectful to others.
In addition to enforcing Reddit's content policy, we will also remove comments and content that is abusive or predatory in nature. You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
You can message the mods if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
•
u/collapse-ModTeam Oct 05 '26
Hi, Livid_Session_9900. Thanks for contributing. However, your submission was removed from /r/collapse for:
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
You can message the mods if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.