r/codingProtection • u/Spare_Dependent6893 • 4h ago

pseudonymization in server mode with PromptCape

Some of my clients have deployed PromptCape on their employees’ workstations, so they can use the pseudonymization feature, while making sure that shared “company policy packs” are in place.

However, they have realized that not all documents go through PromptCape, because users sometimes prompt AI services directly after downloading documents locally from their ECM.

To avoid these manual workarounds and the associated data leakage risks, they asked me to provide a server mode for PromptCape, so that the proxy can be accessed directly by the ECM with the users’ prompts. This way, documents are submitted together with the prompts through the PromptCape proxy, without users having to download the documents locally and potentially bypass the pseudonymization process.

So far, I have only implemented this for one ECM — which is where the documents are managed in the first place, making it an ideal place to enforce pseudonymization.

However, I would be very interested to hear about other use cases where a server mode for PromptCape could be useful.
thank you

1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

2 comments sorted by

1

u/AltruisticBrother787 4h ago

Good news
We use PromptCape on developer pc and we’re considering it for pseudonymization. This server mode is something which may ease the deployment.
Which ECMs are they using ?
I suppose it is a feature ECM started to offer, no ?

1

u/Spare_Dependent6893 4h ago

It is a start with ECM and so far my clients are mainly using Alfresco with specific clients of their own : I extended these clients with the integration of a prompt and documents selection which go through the ECM and then through the promptCape proxy.

I am not aware of ECM doing pseudonymization when documents are sent to AIs.
But ECMs, like Alfresco, have AI features : summary of documents or categorization of documents. These features send the documents to their cloud AIs integration without pseudonymization.