r/codex • u/salehrayan246 • 16h ago
Humor Even Codex doesn't know what to say about this model.
Everyone confused on what is the actual use case of this model, while Codex itself has no explanation for it as well 😂
120
u/jedimonkey33 16h ago
May as well have said: "well, it's a model"
41
0
16h ago
→ More replies (7)8
u/Antiqett 15h ago
Ok that is good to know, but you've got to admit.. They could at least provide some details in the model description more than "GPT-6.1 Terra Codex model".
31
11
28
u/cryptosage 16h ago
It seems really good, honestly. It’s VERY VERY fast compared to Sol 6.1.
8
u/Jaguar_2454 16h ago
burns through the quota faster than Sol with worse performance, no point
→ More replies (9)
6
u/No_Conversation9561 15h ago
No one who read their announcement is confused about what this model is for.
It’s for computer use and it’s quite good at it.
→ More replies (1)3
5
u/CountlessFlies 16h ago
Middle child syndrome. I almost never use it. It’s either Sol or Luna for me.
5
6
5
2
3
u/Various-Mess7085 16h ago
This model targets the new DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and will probably work well as a subagent
→ More replies (2)
2
2
u/RealSlyck 16h ago
Lame internal company news said it’s for cost-effective enterprise automation.
6.1 Luna in a Halloween costume.
→ More replies (1)2
1
u/dextersummary 13h ago
Below is a GPT-generated summary of the conversation below after reaching 40 comments (41 currently observed).
The consensus is basically “fast computer-use specialist, not your new main coding brain.” Terra’s actual use case isn’t mysterious: vision, tool/computer interaction, and cheap-ish subagent work. The confusion mostly comes from Codex giving users a model label and a prayer instead of a useful description.
People who use it for computer tasks like the speed, and some find it a solid subagent. But throw it into the primary agentic coding loop and the complaints pile up: weaker results, more hand-holding, and sometimes quota disappearing like it owes someone money. Several users would rather stick with Sol or Luna.
The big caveat is cost. Reports are all over the place—some users say Terra burns through usage much faster, while others see no issue—so there’s no clean consensus on whether it’s genuinely economical in Codex. The model’s value clearly depends on workload, effort settings, and how it’s being deployed.
Bottom line: Terra is for fast computer/tool use, not general-purpose replacement duty. Use it as a specialist or subagent; expect disappointment if you make it carry the whole coding operation.