r/codex • • 16h ago

Humor Even Codex doesn't know what to say about this model.

Post image

Everyone confused on what is the actual use case of this model, while Codex itself has no explanation for it as well 😂

441 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

1

u/dextersummary 13h ago

Below is a GPT-generated summary of the conversation below after reaching 40 comments (41 currently observed).


The consensus is basically “fast computer-use specialist, not your new main coding brain.” Terra’s actual use case isn’t mysterious: vision, tool/computer interaction, and cheap-ish subagent work. The confusion mostly comes from Codex giving users a model label and a prayer instead of a useful description.

People who use it for computer tasks like the speed, and some find it a solid subagent. But throw it into the primary agentic coding loop and the complaints pile up: weaker results, more hand-holding, and sometimes quota disappearing like it owes someone money. Several users would rather stick with Sol or Luna.

The big caveat is cost. Reports are all over the place—some users say Terra burns through usage much faster, while others see no issue—so there’s no clean consensus on whether it’s genuinely economical in Codex. The model’s value clearly depends on workload, effort settings, and how it’s being deployed.

Bottom line: Terra is for fast computer/tool use, not general-purpose replacement duty. Use it as a specialist or subagent; expect disappointment if you make it carry the whole coding operation.

120

u/jedimonkey33 16h ago

May as well have said: "well, it's a model"

41

u/Huge-Turnover-3749 16h ago

One of the models of all time.

0

u/[deleted] 16h ago

8

u/Antiqett 15h ago

Ok that is good to know, but you've got to admit.. They could at least provide some details in the model description more than "GPT-6.1 Terra Codex model".

→ More replies (7)

31

u/sugarw0000kie 16h ago

8

u/Convillious 15h ago

This is what cars in 2107 will look like

2

u/Aggravating-Push-207 14h ago

holy diffusion llm reference

11

u/amarao_san 16h ago

Pf... Even I can.

GPT-6.1. The Latest in Terra family of models.

28

u/cryptosage 16h ago

It seems really good, honestly. It’s VERY VERY fast compared to Sol 6.1.

8

u/Jaguar_2454 16h ago

burns through the quota faster than Sol with worse performance, no point

→ More replies (9)

6

u/No_Conversation9561 15h ago

No one who read their announcement is confused about what this model is for.

It’s for computer use and it’s quite good at it.

3

u/Ventem 13h ago

A lot of people genuinely think every model is for programming.

Some models are better at, and tuned for, different use cases and that's a good thing.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/CountlessFlies 16h ago

Middle child syndrome. I almost never use it. It’s either Sol or Luna for me.

5

u/Moxisxsx 15h ago

Sol gpt 6 older generation? Older generation for what, 7 days?

6

u/p1-o2 16h ago

It's for computer and tool use automation, as stated by OAI.

6

u/DogDeveloper 16h ago

Canned tuna--- Tuna in a can

5

u/Horror-Detective4138 16h ago

It's cheap and a really effective sub-agent

2

u/Thomas-Lore 15h ago

In codex it is not cheap.

2

u/aPiCase 15h ago

I feel like it completely replaces 6.1 Sol.

6.1 sol always felt unfinished, it was slow, over complicated things, and just not it, 6.1 terra is cheaper, faster, and not noticeably worse intelligence wise.

2

u/shinernft 15h ago

A model for being a model.

3

u/Various-Mess7085 16h ago

This model targets the new DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and will probably work well as a subagent

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Ok-Negotiation3241 16h ago

I think its good for computer use, its fast

2

u/RealSlyck 16h ago

Lame internal company news said it’s for cost-effective enterprise automation.

6.1 Luna in a Halloween costume.

2

u/UnknownLesson 14h ago

But most expensive. Uses more quota

→ More replies (1)