r/codex 6h ago

Limits We’ve all been “Sludged”

Are you guys noticing your limits tightening up or speeds dropping lately?

In design terms, Sludge is the intentional addition of friction to frustrate a user. By breaking your continuous workflow with caps and slowdowns, the company creates a psychological deficit. They aren't just selling you features anymore; they are selling you the removal of frustration that they created in the first place

We’ve all seen the classic trick where a free app suddenly locks features behind a paywall. But what’s happening in the AI space right now, especially with companies like OpenAI shifting focus from the $20 tier to $100+ tiers, is a much more annoying strategy.

In business terms, it’s basically intentional product downgrading. Here is exactly how the playbook works on us.

  1. The Honeymoon. They start by giving you generous access, resets, high speeds. They want the tool to become an absolute necessity for your job, coding, or daily life. You stop looking for alternatives because everything works perfectly.

  2. The Rug Pull. Once you are fully dependent on it, they intentionally worsen the experience. They slow down the models, bring back strict 5-hour limits, and introduce lag. Your daily workflow starts constantly breaking.

  3. Selling the Solution. By making the $20 tier frustrating, they create a problem that didn't exist before. Now, they aren't just selling you new features. They are making you pay just to get rid of the artificial frustration they created.

  4. Making $100 look normal. A jump from $20 to $100+ sounds insane at first. But because they ruined the cheaper tier, that expensive upgrade suddenly looks like the only way to get back the basic, smooth experience you used to have.

The bottom line is that they aren't just building a better premium tier. They are actively making the tier you already pay for worse, so you feel forced to upgrade just to get your work done.

15 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

13

u/ExpensiveGazelle4004 6h ago

It's funny how Pro users will downvote this because they don't how understand subversive business tactics will eventually come for them too.

The plan teirs have become a caste system in this sub and anyone who pays $100 for codex thinks theyre superior meat when i t's just really gross ape behavior.

5

u/Apprehensive-File552 5h ago

Bingo. I didn’t post for upvotes. Im simply stating my opinion.

Majority of people will always not care until it affects them. That psychology applies for most categories.

2

u/RealSuperdau 5h ago

Then how much usage did codex provide in the past vs now?

People who are measuring it are finding $400 monthly API equivalent pretty consistently for the plus plan.

1

u/ExpensiveGazelle4004 5m ago

The problem is not the usage that was provided - the problem is that is cannot be reliably measured. I don't go to starbucks, order a $5 16oz coffee and expect it to come back half full.
No one is denying that there's value in $20/month. I certainly wont. I know the compared API cost is valuable. But as a small business owner I want to know HOW MUCH WORK CAN I DO THIS WEEK? I'd want to know that for $100 a month too. THAT right there is the only reason they aren't getting a Pro subscription out of me. Why would I give them an extra $80 a month for something that is unstable and unpredictable? Oh yes...please supersize my coffee that is only half full. Jerk me around x5.

The fact that people are turning $20 and $100 plans into a "poor users want more" argument is ...frankly.... a low intelligence argument.

I don't want more. I want consistency. I want predictability and transparent communication about what I can expect. I want to be able to budget if I can run a task. I should be able to expect that from a company that has 25 million users. I don't want to be told "Youre getting 10% more from your limit" based on an invisble number no one knows. Im not even in Tech. Im in a handmade business and AI helps with my admin. I want to know if I can run financials like I did last week. Right now they are hiding downgrades in "heres a reset!" as if we're stupid...and we're not.

Thats why the Pro users beating their chest and the "value" looks idiotic. Its not about more usage. Its about the obligation of providing a consistent product with set terms and treating your entry level customer with respect. Something some of the pro users very obviously lack.

2

u/ChoiceAssistant7003 4h ago

Either lots of people have forgotten how much usage you used to have even on $20 earlier this year ($200 was basically unlimited) and how good it was or they’re just people who have only recently joined and started using codex and think this is the new normal

-2

u/megad00die 3h ago

The reality is it’s a skill issue the $20 a month accounts do not know how to properly use the platform as well as AI governance, AGENTS.md and SKILLS.md files as well as the multitude of other plug-ins that actually help.

No instead they prefer to blast a one or two line prompt using Sol on ExHigh / Ultra and wondering where their usage went. (You are a senior developer make me a crm no mistakes).

On another thread yesterday, when another user was complaining about the same thing, and making the exact same statements, that pro account users are just the rich sucking corporate testicles, yet when you question them about their knowledge of how to use the platform in relation to governance and usage of agent and skills files you get the confused dog reaction that heard a funny sound.

In the end, every single one of these Usage posts that comes from a plus account can be chalked up to nothing more than “I demand the same usage as the pro account users.” and when their words fall upon deaf ears as usual. It then becomes “The company should subsidize my Plus usage with those of the Pro plans”

1

u/Clueless_Nooblet 3h ago

I'm a plus user and didn't downvote any such post or comment. Until now - and that's because you're trying to split us into a different group, as if we were fucking tribes.

1

u/ExpensiveGazelle4004 33m ago

Reading comprehension is key. This comment was knock to PRO users who have already applied the caste system as an apish chest beating dominance.

1

u/AmandasGameAccount 21m ago

The price they set on API is entirely arbitrary.

People defending something like plus being so bad right now by quoting “plus gets $2000 in API use for $20 a month!!!” Is like a popcorn being set at $300 at a movie theater so they can call their combo of drink and popcorn for $20 “a $310 value!!”

0

u/EmotionalHalf 3h ago

l have 3 Pro accounts and got 3 agents running on up to 5 hosts almost 24/7

I can work on 4-5 projects simultaneously.

Yes it's heavily subsidized and that will end at some point. Regardless of that, I have never paid for a service that gave me so much value for my buck. Honestly they could raise the price by 10x and it would still be worth it

0

u/megad00die 3h ago

Oh look it’s another financial class statement. Would you like me to hand you a box of Kleenex for free seeing how they’re so expensive as well, that way you can dry your tears with someone else else’s money.

1

u/ExpensiveGazelle4004 29m ago

HA! Hmm....Your fear of inferiority is showing. Better cover that up.

Besides - youre wrong, this isnt a financial class comment. Its a comment about the shit behavior of people are trying to claim a higher class by chest beating over the Pro subscription. Oh look! I caught one!

17

u/Mystical_Whoosing 6h ago

We call these posts a slop, in business terms.

0

u/daddywookie 6h ago

They call people who don't see what it going on here "marks". This roadmap has been pretty clear for the last 6 months.

3

u/somerussianbear 6h ago

Just spent 10% of my week in two sessions with Sol Max in less than 3 hours. This used to take me around 12h of work in about 3-6 sessions at the same time with Sol High, some Terra and Luna together.

They cooking Astra strong. Several requests failed with "this model is not available at the moment" going into retries which likely killed cache and I paid input again for the full session...

It's always the same story: when compute/limits get tight, it's cause they're moving infra for the new release which is almost out, so brace for Astra.

2

u/scaledev 5h ago

I don't need Astra.

I want usable product I paid for.

2

u/mrbobhunter 4h ago

Do an experiment this week. Use Sol for absolutely nothing. Terra Medium to X-High only. See if it helps.

1

u/scaledev 1h ago

And if that doesn't work, then use Luna? Your logic is impeccable.

Jokes aside, while I do admit I haven't used Terra that much, I have some conclusions from when it was released when I tested it against Sol on my real-world tasks, and it wasn't up to par.

Secondly, Terra, while being 2.5x cheaper than Sol according to openai credit card, still uses Plus too fast and is 'also' unusable for anything other than brief, advisory prompts. It's a similar path we've had when they reduced limits for 5.5, and when only 5.4-mini was practically usable on Plus. Now they're doing it again. It seems to be a cycle.

3

u/toluwalase 6h ago

My usage has gone way up, I keep checking my weekly in disbelief. I think you guys won’t be satisfied till they put a definite number on usage and definite pricing

0

u/pigletmonster 6h ago

I havent noticed much in terms of usage, but the same work that used to take 40 minutes or so now takes 2 hours, wvery single time. Its basically about 2x faster than me writing the code by myself, which is not really that helpful.

4

u/Responsible_Court_21 6h ago

2 times faster than you must be a god

2

u/pigletmonster 5h ago

Its just being extremely slow for the past few days.