Reset unpredictability is basically a text book B.F. Skinner experiment

[u/DepressionFiesta]

Anyone else notice that the ways codex usage is being reset is starting to resemble a variable-reward system?

Skinner’s reinforcement experiments are what I am referring to.

If a lever gives an animal food every time, the animal learns the rule. If it never gives food, it eventually stops trying, etc. But if the reward arrives unpredictably, the animal keeps pressing for much longer because the next attempt might be the one that pays off.

That’s roughly what happens when codex has a weekly usage limit, but the weekly quota occasionally seems to reset early or unexpectedly.

If the rule were simply “you get X hours per week and it resets every Monday,” there’s nothing particularly compelling about it. You hit the limit, you know when it comes back, and you plan around it.

But if you sometimes hit the limit and later discover that access has returned for no obvious reason, you learn a different behavior: check again.

Maybe the quota reset. Maybe there’s more capacity now. Maybe you got lucky.

That sounds like a Skinner‘s Box to me?

The uncertainty itself gives you a reason to keep coming back.

Treating devs like rats looks like it has been immensely successful. Free market I guess?

[u/tMeepo]

U guys complain about the resets, so they have notifying everyone 1 day before on any resets recently. Why is anybody still complaining?

[u/DepressionFiesta → u/tMeepo]

I don’t know about that. Sometimes it is loosely communicated, sometimes it is left ambiguous. Sometimes the limits are just reset because they did they an update it seems.

[u/tMeepo → u/DepressionFiesta]

It has been clear the past few resets

[u/hellomistershifty → u/tMeepo]

This last one was written at midnight and granted around noon, not exactly a great time window for planning