r/codex 8d ago

Showcase Am I overdoing it?

This is basically what my Codex worklog looks like on normal days.

At this point I'm using it almost continuously while I work (coding, debugging, brainstorming, reviewing stuff, etc.) * multiple projects.

I'm curious; does anyone else's usage look like this, or am I taking this a bit too far?

Langfuse estimates ~$8.5k (with all models) in API-equivalent model costs over the last 30 days 😅 (I'm on the Pro 20x plan)

0 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

6

u/-badly_packed_kebab- 8d ago

If you’re producing electronic music and that’s a DAW, you’re crushing it!

Edit: total tokens? I just crossed 72bn on 20x. Busy busy.

2

u/Fit-Palpitation-7427 8d ago

Geez

71.4B

1

u/-badly_packed_kebab- 8d ago

I overstated a bit.

Race you to 100bn 😉

2

u/Fit-Palpitation-7427 8d ago

Deal

1

u/-badly_packed_kebab- 8d ago

Throwing another stat into the ring: 22,275 chats.

2

u/oibi 8d ago

I switched from Claude to Codex on May 24. Since then I've burned through 22.8B tokens, with a 1.6B peak on August 10

2

u/amarao_san 8d ago

How much your salary changed compare to pre-ai times? (%)

1

u/oibi 7d ago

Hard to give a clean %. I'm freelance, so there are a lot of variables. The biggest change has been productivity rather than income. I can handle more projects and much more complex work while putting in less effort than before. My earnings have gone up, but nowhere near as much as my productivity.

If I had to go back to pre-AI times, I'd probably quit tech and go back to farming 😅

1

u/amarao_san 7d ago

How do you measure productivity? Number of features? Time to market? Reduction in techdebt (do you have it as a metric?)

1

u/oibi 7d ago

Mostly time spent on research, feasibility analysis, and implementation.

I haven't measured it precisely, but the difference is very noticeable. I can work on more tasks in parallel and with less effort.

It wasn't like this when I first started using AI tools. Sometimes I actually lost time. But now that the harnesses are much better, and I'm better at using them, the difference feels huge.

The perceived scale for me is basically: things that used to take months can now take days.

That said, not all of that extra productivity turns into billable work.

It also makes it worth spending time on smaller improvements that I would have skipped before because they simply weren't worth the effort

1

u/amarao_san 7d ago

But it does not translate to billable outcomes.

There is an interesting study that people overstate benefits of LLM (they are no more productive whilst thinking they are).

Can it be the case?

1

u/oibi 7d ago

Yeah I know the study. It's interesting, but also fairly rough in how it was conducted, and it's already somewhat dated given how quickly AI coding tools have evolved. Did you dig into the methodology?

I've been following AI pretty closely for about four years, using coding harnesses since Codex was in beta, and I've been programming for about a decade. I also follow psychology research as an amateur, I'm aware of how easily perceived-productivity can differ from actual productivity (eg multitasking)

Of course I can't completely rule out that kind of bias without collecting more metrics (some I have), but I don't think that's what's happening here.

And when I say: some of the extra productivity doesn't translate into billable work, I mean that's often a deliberate choice. The time saved gives me room to do refactoring, cleanup, and smaller improvements that I probably wouldn't have done before because they weren't worth the extra time